search for: unweildy

Hi List, Just wondering if anyone has tried CentOS on this laptop. HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6 Sam's club is selling it for $699 right now. http://www.samsclub.com/sams/hp-15-6-touch-nb-intel-core-i7-4700qm/prod11610128.ip?navAction=push HP ENVY 15-j067cl 15.6" Touchscreen Laptop Computer, Intel Core i7-4700QM, 8GB Memory, 750GB Hard Drive Thanks, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of

...ation far ***easier*** in R than in SAS. SAS had ***one*** data structure: The data frame. You are hand-cuffed into it, and all manipulations must be contorted to fit this structure. In R/Splus, the sky's the limit. The flexibility of R/Splus puts the user in control, and if the syntax gets unweildy, you can roll your own function to turn a complex command into a single word. It bears repeating that for mega-line data frames apparently SAS can do easily things that bring R to its knees. I have no personal experience in this regard, but. cheers, Rolf Turner Usual email address:...

Hi, I have huge matrices in which the response variable is in the first column and the regressors are in the other columns. What I wanted to do now is something like this: #this is just to get an example-matrix DataMatrix <- rep(1,1000); Disturbance <- rnorm(900); DataMatrix[101:1000] <- DataMatrix[101:1000]+Disturbance; DataMatrix <- matrix(DataMatrix,ncol=10,nrow=100); #estimate

Here is a patch to allow private key files to be placed system wide (for all users) in a secure (non-NFS) mounted location on systems where home directories are NFS mounted. This is especially important for users who use blank passphrases rather than ssh-agent (a good example of where this is necessary is for tunnelling lpd through ssh on systems that run lpd as user lp). IdentityFile now accepts

...enever we access them - at some point we may have a patch that demonstrates just how much work that is, but until then we can only make vague statements, and by the time we do this by any substantial amount it will've been a fair bit of work only to throw it away in favor of (b) if it looks too unweildy.) > c> Extend MDNode to DINode and modify streamers (bitcode reader|writer, ll reader|writer) to be aware of DINode > We can provide DINode::get(…) to create a DINode. DINode can have its own Profile function. As discussed offline, Eric & I really don't think this is acceptab...

I'm trying to form contingincy tables among a set of character variables which were read from a .csv file and have missing represented as "". I want to exclude the missing levels from the table. > levels(CPIC) [1] "" "N" "Y" > levels(Manix) [1] "" "N" "Y" > xtabs(~CPIC + Manix, exclude=c("",NA))

...m - at some > point we may have a patch that demonstrates just how much work that > is, but until then we can only make vague statements, and by the time > we do this by any substantial amount it will've been a fair bit of > work only to throw it away in favor of (b) if it looks too unweildy.) > >> c> Extend MDNode to DINode and modify streamers (bitcode reader|writer, ll reader|writer) to be aware of DINode >> We can provide DINode::get(…) to create a DINode. DINode can have its own Profile function. > > As discussed offline, Eric & I really don't...

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 2:05 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: > Saleem, Owen, others on the thread who are concerned about this: it seems > that some of the concern is that the project goals are too narrow, and thus > the eventual result may not serve the full community well over time. > > Would any of you be interested in what we should consider as the list

The intent of this proposal is to speedup compilation of "-flto -g" for c++ programs. This is based on discussions with Adrian, David and Eric. --------------------------- Problem: A single class can be used in multiple source files and the DI (Debug Info) class is included in multiple bc files. The duplication of class definitions causes blow-up in # of MDNodes, # of DIEs, leading to

"Does raidzN actually protect against bitrot?" That''s a kind of radical, possibly offensive, question formula that I have lately. Reading up on theory of RAID5, I grasped the idea of the write hole (where one of the sectors of the stripe, such as the parity data, doesn''t get written - leading to invalid data upon read). In general, I think the same applies to bitrot of

I think I posted this patch before, but it looks like it was in December 2012 (!). 1/1 libxl: introduce an option for disabling the non-O_DIRECT workaround Ideally it would go into 4.4, at least. Provided the corresponding qemu part has gone into qemu-xen, which I think it has. Can anyone confirm ?