search for: unvirtualize

I've been using tc/htb for network control previously to control bandwidth available to different services running on their own IPs on a unvirtualized host. Now, I have put them into their own guest VM. I would like to be able to do something similar to ensure the more crucial service gets more bandwidth as well as ensuring ssh always get reserved bandwidth. However, when I try the good old tc/htb commands on the host, it fails to do anything u...

...all, of course, assuming I didn't overlook anything relevant. Which is exactly my question: did I overlook something? Oh, and this one, of course: are there ramifications for compilers that use LLVM as a backend? In particular: If a language makes any and all functions virtual, is LLVM able to unvirtualize them (at the link stage, if necessary)? Regards, Jo

...would''nt try to init any hardware devices directly. Maybe these options could help...good luck > This is a pretty serious problem... no bites yet? This doesn''t sound familiar to anyone? > It''s not a bacula problem. Bacula doesn''t do this to us running on unvirtualized hardware. > Stephen Bosch wrote: > Hello: > > At the off-list suggestion of another user, we have tried adding > ''noirqbalance'' to the xen start line in grub, we''ve disabled USB in the > system BIOS, and we''ve added ''nousb''...

In general, the C++ compiler does NOT know the type of the leaf class when performing a virtual method invocation. In particular, a parameter (including "this") alleging to be a Foo* (Foo being some class) may actually be any subclass of Foo, so unless the compiler can trace the value flow all the way from the instantiation, it can't tell. The necessary tracing is (a) hard, (b)

Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >> No, please don't do this. The idea of llvmbuilder is that it is a > >> "free" wrapper around the other existing API calls. Making the > >> methods virtual would make them much more expensive. > > > > Wouldn't the class of

...y. Hoping someone can see what I''m missing here. I''m trying to create a network module, used similar to the ''users'' configuration described in the Best Practices document. I have a users module which has that and it works with similar syntax to below. If I "unvirtualize" the network_interface for test1a-eth1 under the network_dmz_virt class, this works. Please help. Let me know if I need to provide more information. Node information is set up per the Best Practices, in nodes.pp and templates.pp respectively. The other manifests are in modules/network/manifes...