search for: unvirtualized

I've been using tc/htb for network control previously to control bandwidth available to different services running on their own IPs on a unvirtualized host. Now, I have put them into their own guest VM. I would like to be able to do something similar to ensure the more crucial service gets more bandwidth as well as ensuring ssh always get reserved bandwidth. However, when I try the good old tc/htb commands on the host, it fails to do anything us...

Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 15:19 -0400 schrieb Jonathan S. Shapiro: > In general, the C++ compiler does NOT know the type of the leaf class > when performing a virtual method invocation. In particular, a parameter > (including "this") alleging to be a Foo* (Foo being some class) may > actually be any subclass of Foo, so unless the compiler can trace the > value flow all

...would''nt try to init any hardware devices directly. Maybe these options could help...good luck > This is a pretty serious problem... no bites yet? This doesn''t sound familiar to anyone? > It''s not a bacula problem. Bacula doesn''t do this to us running on unvirtualized hardware. > Stephen Bosch wrote: > Hello: > > At the off-list suggestion of another user, we have tried adding > ''noirqbalance'' to the xen start line in grub, we''ve disabled USB in the > system BIOS, and we''ve added ''nousb''...

In general, the C++ compiler does NOT know the type of the leaf class when performing a virtual method invocation. In particular, a parameter (including "this") alleging to be a Foo* (Foo being some class) may actually be any subclass of Foo, so unless the compiler can trace the value flow all the way from the instantiation, it can't tell. The necessary tracing is (a) hard, (b)

Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >> No, please don't do this. The idea of llvmbuilder is that it is a > >> "free" wrapper around the other existing API calls. Making the > >> methods virtual would make them much more expensive. > > > > Wouldn't the class of

Hi All, I asked on IRC but didn''t have everything organized and most people seemed busy. Hoping someone can see what I''m missing here. I''m trying to create a network module, used similar to the ''users'' configuration described in the Best Practices document. I have a users module which has that and it works with similar syntax to below. If I