search for: untuned

On 18/09/17 17:23, Ben Turner wrote: > Do you want tuned or untuned? If tuned I'd like to try one of my tunings for metadata, but I will use yours if you want. (Re-CC'd list) I would be interested in both, if possible: To confirm that it's not only my machines that exhibit this behaviour given my settings, and to see what can be achieved with your tu...

...4, 5, 6) set.seed(23) # set random seed for repeatability # log(x) + cos(x) + noise f <- function(x) log(x) + cos(x) x <- seq(0.1, 5, by = 0.05) y <- f(x) + rnorm(x, sd = 0.2) plot(x, y, col="gray80") legend("topleft", c("log(x) + cos(x)", "SVM, untuned", "SVM, tuned"), bty="n", col=colors, pch=20) lines(x, f(x), col = colors[1]) # overlay noiseless data # SVM, untuned svmmodel1 <- svm(x, y) print(summary(svmmodel1)) y1 <- predict(svmmodel1, x) lines(x, y1, col = colors[2]) # SVM with tuning t...

...e board. Even if we did, I would still be uncomfortable with this: "hasn't been proven entirely competitive yet" implies that we've pursued the current inliner and tried hard to make it better without listening to inline. In fact, the current inliner is almost completely untuned and has many known problems. I am concerned that "listening to inline" will paper over other things that could be solved in much better ways. If the inlining heuristics were already considered to be well tuned and a study showed that 'listening to inline' was better than i...

...> here. Most of this is in the performance tuning phase, and depending on > your point of comparison, it may be an easier or harder problem. > Essentially, the closer to C performance your current runtime is, the > harder you'll have to work. Getting 1/10 of C performance with an untuned > LLVM based JIT is pretty easy; the closer you get to C (or JVM) performance > the harder it gets. > > (Disclaimer: This is me speaking off the top of my head. Take everything > I just said with a grain of salt.) > > Philip > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML...

I successfully switched to using mysql and all the problems relating to sqllite and stored configs, locking issues, etc. went away. However, it seems as if something new has suddenly popped up in my puppetmaster logs and the clients are failing to compile their configurations: info: Found proxy in /etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp err: Puppet::Parser::Interpreter failed with error Mysql::Error:

Hi there, I've backed up some files(about 20G,with many subdirectories and files) a months ago to an USB drive,and I use rsync to check if there are changes.After the process,I checked the log file and found no update needed.But the stats said: Number of files: 61775 Number of files transferred: 0 Total file size: 24169314260 bytes Total transferred file size: 0 bytes Literal data: 0 bytes

....com.au # 3.4-STABLE socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT read raw = yes write raw = yes shared mem size = 6291456 In the kernel config file the following are: options "SHMMAX=(SHMMAXPGS*PAGE_SIZE+1)" options SHMMAXPGS=2048 The disk system is an untuned HV diff SCSI system using ST410800WD drives in both cases, with dual PPro200's. Mike Squires

Hello, I've setup an Samba 3 server on a Debian Etch 4 The server has : - 8x 500Gb raid 5 via 3ware Raid Controller - Filesystem is Ext3 over Lvm2 (I know that be better an Xfs FS instead ... now I can't change it easily ) - Xeon dual core 2 - 2Gb of RAM - connected to a gigabit switch using 2 bonded NIC When I copy big files (> 2Gb MPEG files) from Windows clients the copy do a

...so did the stereo one and -q0 in stereo was pretty much the same size as it was in RC3. I also notice that ogginfo says that the nominal bitrate for -q0 in CVS is 48.001000 kb/s, whereas it gives -q0 for RC3 as 32.007000. The newly tuned 32khz modes give similar results to this, compaired to the untuned modes of RC3. My question is, is this intentional? I would have thought that the encoder would have tended to hang around in the range of 2/3 of the rate of stereo, as it has done for RC3. Just wondering if the quality settings are wrong or whether some kind of change has been made. Geoff. &lt...

Hi, my situation: One internet connection 256 kbps uplink/downlink, pretty stable speed, a Linux router with three NICs (one to ISP, one to DMZ and one with VLANs enabled to our LAN). Each of three VLANs (1, 10, 11) is a region for me; id 1 gets guaranteed 128 kbps, id 10 and 11 both get guaranteed 64 kbps (both uplink and downlink). Simple configuration. After I read relevant parts of lartc

On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > > On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:31 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > >> >> >>> I know/hope that the proposal isn't for the inlinehint to be a >>> synonym >>> for "force inline", it would just raise the threshold to increase >>> the >>> likeliness that it would be inlined. The

...e (256KB stripe size) with a software RAID0 stripe on top (also 256KB chunks). bonnie++ results look like this: mount -t ext3 175 MB/s writes, 352 MB/s reads mount -t ext3 -o data=writeback 185 MB/s writes, 254 MB/s reads mount -t ext2 340 MB writes, 266 MB/s reads XFS on this hardware gets (untuned) about 300 MB/s writes and 400 MB/s reads. The hardware itself is capable of more, and those results are representative of several different configs of hardware and software RAID options. Any ideas as to what leads to ext3's performance hit? I've tested *lots* of configurations. It&...

Hello, I was wondering if there is an example list somewhere of whole program optimizations done by LLVM based compilers? I'm only familiar with method-level optimizations, and I'm being told wpo can deliver many great speedups. My language is currently staticly typed JIT based and uses the JVM, and I want to move it over to LLVM so that I can have options where it can be ahead of time

On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:31 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > > >> I know/hope that the proposal isn't for the inlinehint to be a >> synonym >> for "force inline", it would just raise the threshold to increase the >> likeliness that it would be inlined. The question is whether >> "something being c++ inline" in any way is really

Hello, I am planning to build a bigger Internet platform and actually evaluating Java EE and Rails. I have a lot of Java experience and I am quite new to Rails. After playing some weeks with Rails I am sure that it is a mature web framework and I really like the productivtity of Rails. One of the key advantages is that new developers will understand this platform much quicker than all the Java

I''m new so opensolaris and very new to ZFS. In the past we have always used linux for our database backends. So now we are looking for a new database server to give us a big performance boost, and also the possibility for scalability. Our current database consists mainly of a huge table containing about 230 million records and a few (relatively) smaller tables (something like 13 million

Adam, With the blog entry[1] you''ve made about gzip for ZFS, it raises a couple of questions... 1) It would appear that a ZFS filesystem can support files of varying compression algorithm. If a file is compressed using method A but method B is now active, if I truncate the file and rewrite it, is A or B used? 2) The question of whether or not to use bzip2 was raised in the

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Accidentally sent to uiuc server. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Can you compare your results

...ing Samba <samba.lists.samba.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/ Nope, Never wrong, Jeremy! The kernel tuneable is nflocks and its untuned size is determined partly by the user license that your HP-UX os is installed with. I <believe> that for the little 2 user HP-UX os, the default is around 200 flocks systemwide. I ran into this issue when trying to get smbtorture lock tests passing on HP's build farm machines, and upped...