search for: unthinkable

On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Pete Biggs wrote: >> Does CentOS changed the package management? :-) > > Quite. > > This is not an Ubuntu dig, but when I challenge some of the users > about the more dangerous sudo's they try, inevitably they say they > got the command from the net, and by that they usually mean Ubuntu > forums. Whether the instructions come from the Ubuntu

On 8/2/20 1:19 PM, John Pierce wrote: > One of the things that bugs me about PKI trust chains like this, what > happens if the unthinkable happens, and Microsoft's RootCA gets compromised > and has to be revoked... does that mean every single piece of UEFI > hardware out there needs a BIOS upgrade? Yes.? They'll be vulnerable to malware signed by the old CA until they're updated. That's better than systems w...

On 02/08/2020 19:54, John Pierce wrote: > On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:45 AM Phil Perry <pperry at elrepo.org> wrote: > >> On 02/08/2020 16:26, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> On the side note: it is Microsoft that signs one of Linux packages now. >> We seem to have made one more step away from ?our? computers being _our >> computers_. Am I wrong?

...ms? I know that a number of people people in the community expressed concerns about how other passes will perform with better AA results (e.g. If LICM becomes more aggressive, register pressure may increase, which may cause us to spill when we haven't before, etc). So, such a problem isn't unthinkable. :) On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:56 PM, David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>> wrote: Hi Greg, I see there is on going work with alias analysis and it appears the prior CFLAA has been abandoned. I have a variant of it where I reworked how compression was done t...

On 04/09/18 11:15, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, Pete Biggs wrote: > >>> Does CentOS changed the package management? :-) >> >> Quite. >> >> This is not an Ubuntu dig, but when I challenge some of the users >> about the more dangerous sudo's they try, inevitably they say they got >> the command from the net, and by that they

...mbeds RH (or CentOS) signing cert, so (I believe) every > release of the shim needs to be signed by Microsoft. So it's not quite > as efficient as MS signing a RH/CentOS CA key, but is not far off. > One of the things that bugs me about PKI trust chains like this, what happens if the unthinkable happens, and Microsoft's RootCA gets compromised and has to be revoked... does that mean every single piece of UEFI hardware out there needs a BIOS upgrade? and don't UEFI bios updates have to be signed too? -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz

On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 3:54 PM Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/2/20 1:19 PM, John Pierce wrote: > > One of the things that bugs me about PKI trust chains like this, what > > happens if the unthinkable happens, and Microsoft's RootCA gets > compromised > > and has to be revoked... does that mean every single piece of UEFI > > hardware out there needs a BIOS upgrade? > > > Yes. They'll be vulnerable to malware signed by the old CA until > they're updated. &...

...em to be consistent regarding long buffer time, odd drop outs, long reconnect times, etc. Normally, I refer folks to one of the infinitely better players out there, but now the issue seems to be "but IT controls my computer and what I install on it". So I'm looking into doing the unthinkable, and providing better support of WMP. Are these issues with WMP common? Are there solutions/work-arounds that we can do server side to solve them? I apologize if this is a bit vague, but I'm still trying to figure out where to start. I've done a bit of searching online, but haven't...

I have a client that I have installed Dovecot 1.0.1 for is having some performance issues. Especially when using IMAP from various Outlook clients. I have TLS installed and all the IMAP connections are secured. I'm wondering is anyone has any recommendations for monitoring dovecot performance. I'd like to try and nail down where the real performance issues are. I suspect

This just started on my laptop yesterday. My mouse wants to go to the lower left corner of my screen, this seems to be triggered by using the keyboard. Once it is on its way I just have to wait for it to stop so I can move it where I need it or it will just drift back to that corner. I have tried several mice as well as just the onboard touchpad. I am on 4.1 running nightly updates. Thanks

...to do it at boot time if possible. I would like to do it as the user 'guest' to avoid all passwords. I don't want to learn about credentials or anything win-centric like that if I can avoid it, and I also hope that 'guest' is a restricted user who can't do much damage if the unthinkable occurs (somebody r00ts the web server - though this probably won't afford any real protection). __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com

...or alias, or whatever you use) to point to ~lattner/local/x86/llvm-gcc/bin/gcc 2. Add the following environment variable to your startup scripts: setenv LLVM_LIB_SEARCH_PATH /home/vadve/lattner/local/x86/llvm-gcc/bytecode-libs If you don't do this, things will probably break in horrible, unthinkable ways (or maybe not, but they certainly won't work nicely). If you're curious, the environment variable specifies the directory to use for the LLVM equivalent of /usr/lib: the location of system librarys like libc and libm. In order to enable this, I have been fixing bugs in lots of places...

Does CentOS 5.6 have a mailing list manager like ecartis or majordomo? I want to set up mailing lists for my server in the cloud for three domains that I own. What mailing list managers do yourecommend, and where can they be found? I don't ming compiling source code. Thanks, -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison,

> Am 07.04.2018 um 01:41 schrieb Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk>: > > On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 11:50 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Fri, April 6, 2018 11:42 am, Richard Demeny wrote: >>> Just sudo it >> >> This is exactly why I have big reservation in giving users sudo >> permissions. If they need sudo on UNIX or Linux for small thing like this,

Does anyone know of a method that I can get the intersection where the red and blue curves meet i.e. the value on the x-axis? x <- 1:10 y <- 10:1 plot(x,y) abline(lm(y~x),col="blue") abline(h=2.5,col="red") Muhammad

Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 09:55, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> New option -compat lets you configure what to do when deprecated >> interfaces get used. This is intended for testing users of the >> management interfaces. It is experimental. >> >> -compat

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:00:39PM -0700, zach@vmware.com wrote: > Make the generic version of ptep_set_wrprotect a macro. This is good for > code uniformity, and fixes the build for architectures which include pgtable.h > through headers into assembly code, but do not define a ptep_set_wrprotect > function. This against the kernel coding style. In fact, we are usually doing

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:00:39PM -0700, zach@vmware.com wrote: > Make the generic version of ptep_set_wrprotect a macro. This is good for > code uniformity, and fixes the build for architectures which include pgtable.h > through headers into assembly code, but do not define a ptep_set_wrprotect > function. This against the kernel coding style. In fact, we are usually doing

...ms? I know that a number of people people in the community expressed concerns about how other passes will perform with better AA results (e.g. If LICM becomes more aggressive, register pressure may increase, which may cause us to spill when we haven't before, etc). So, such a problem isn't unthinkable. :) On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:56 PM, David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com<mailto:dcallahan at fb.com>> wrote: Hi Greg, I see there is on going work with alias analysis and it appears the prior CFLAA has been abandoned. I have a variant of it where I reworked how compression was done t...

...mmunity expressed >>> concerns about how other passes will perform with better AA results (e.g. >>> If LICM becomes more aggressive, register pressure may increase, which may >>> cause us to spill when we haven't before, etc). So, such a problem isn't >>> unthinkable. :) >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 2:56 PM, David Callahan <dcallahan at fb.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Greg, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I see there is on going work with alias analysis and it appears th...