search for: unternehmensgruppe

...erous in doing so or a good reason why it isn't the default yet. Thank you very much in advance, also for correcting me :-) Regards, Martin -- FreibergNet Systemhaus GbR Martin Welk * Sales, Support Systemhaus f?r Daten- und Netzwerktechnik phone +49 3731 781387 Unternehmensgruppe Liebscher & Partner fax +49 3731 781377 D-09599 Freiberg * Am St. Niclas Schacht 13 http://www.freibergnet.de/

...ger INNOVATIONSPREIS-IT 2017 | Das B?ro: Top 100 B?roprodukte 2017 Binect GmbH Robert-Koch-Stra?e 9, 64331 Weiterstadt, DE Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Dr. Frank Wermeyer, Nils Manegold Unternehmenssitz: Weiterstadt Register: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 94685 Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE 221 302 264 MAX 21-Unternehmensgruppe ? Diese E-Mail kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren, sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail oder von Te...

...binect.de www.binect.de www.facebook.de/binect Binect GmbH Robert-Koch-Stra?e 9, 64331 Weiterstadt, DE Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Christian Ladner, Dr. Frank Wermeyer, Nils Manegold Unternehmenssitz: Weiterstadt Register: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 94685 Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE 221 302 264 MAX 21-Unternehmensgruppe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4278 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20161111/46b0503d/attachment.p7s>

...binect.de www.binect.de www.facebook.de/binect Binect GmbH Robert-Koch-Stra?e 9, 64331 Weiterstadt, DE Gesch?ftsf?hrung: Christian Ladner, Dr. Frank Wermeyer, Nils Manegold Unternehmenssitz: Weiterstadt Register: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 94685 Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE 221 302 264 MAX 21-Unternehmensgruppe ? Diese E-Mail kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrt?mlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese E-Mail. Das unerlaubte Kopieren, sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail oder von Te...

Hi Jochen, On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 00:16, Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > On 02/11/2020 07:07 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote: > > - I have X devices (around 30) and one SSH server > > - Each of them have a unique public key and create one dynamic reverse > > port forwarding on the server > > - All of them connect with the same UNIX user (I don't

> Seems like your firewall could redirect to a different port that doesn't > offer starttls. Yes, of course. But that would require multiple ports, making the client configuration cumbersome and error-prone. Michael

Hello everyone, I work in a setting where remote logins are usually authenticated with SSH user keypairs, but many target accounts need to have a password set nonetheless (to use with sudo, log in via remote KVM, etc.) and cannot be put under a central user administration like LDAP. Enter a corporate password policy that requires passwords to be complex, different everywhere, and of limited

Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 03:16:00PM +0000, Jochen Bern wrote: > Out of interest: > 1. If an extended mechanism were to be implemented, which server pubkey > do you expect to be seen/stored/verified by the client? The proxy's > / v4 middlebox's, or the v6 backend's? Or would you require that all > server-side machines use the *same* host keypairs? I'd do

Hi everyone, I'm running dovecot with quite a lot of users and lots of active imap connections (like 20'000). I'm using different user IDs for users, so I need to have imap {service_count=1} - i.e. I have a lots of imap processes running. Everything works fine, until I reload dovecot configuration. When that happen, every client is forced to relogin in the same time and that

Hello, given a small organization. There are *personal* mailboxes (mailbox per user, incl. subfolders et cetera). The users can share specic folders via the ACL (we call it "other users/", Dovecot calls it "shared" folder. Additionally there are mailboxes Dovecot calls "public" (we use the term "groups/"). They are not associated with a specific account,

If I read this correctly, starttls will fail due to the MITM attack. That is the client knows security has been compromised. Using SSL/TLS, the MITM can use SSL stripping. Since most Postifx conf use "may" for security, the message would go though unencrypted. Correct??? Is there something to enable for perfect forward security with starttls? ? Original Message ? From: s.arcus at

Hi all, When I use an email client, its purpose is as a window into my Dovecot IMAP, and as a mechanism to reply to and send emails. I don't do filtering or calendaring on my email client (filtering via procmail direct to Dovecot). What email clients are all of you using to look at your IMAP email? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own

Hello. I am trying to play through the following test scenario about certificate revocation on Ubuntu 18.04, which has OpenSSH of this version: OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4, OpenSSL 1.0.2n? 7 Dec 2017 1. A CA key is created ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -f ca 2. The CA public key is added to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on some server: cert-authority ssh-ed25519 AAAA...e ca at yoga 3. A user key is created on a