search for: unsavory

...t;required_om_entry" function attribute that told our backend to put it out regardless. I was looking at the list of function attributes and don't see anything that would accomplish this. I could just create a bogus variable and initialize it with the function's value, but that seems unsavory. I'm still using a way old version but I'll adapt as needed. Any suggestions? Did I miss something? John (safely at home with sufficient food & wine)

...ld our backend to put it out regardless. >> >> I was looking at the list of function attributes and don't see anything >> that would accomplish this. >> >> I could just create a bogus variable and initialize it with the >> function's value, but that seems unsavory. >> >> I'm still using a way old version but I'll adapt as needed. >> >> Any suggestions? Did I miss something? > > Hi John, > > This sounds like __attribute__((used)) which Clang turns into > entries in the @llvm.used list. There's also @llvm....

> I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm not charging anything. As > mentioned, the royalties to record labels still stand if you don't follow > the rules, but this will be true regardless of the format > (mp3/vorbis/whatever.) Do you have any ads on your site? That's probably streaming related revenue. Do you list on shoutcast.com? There's definately

...that much of it, but that doesn't seem to me like such a "bad" deal. I applaud the vorbis effort, don't get me wrong, but I don't think it's evil for Frauhofer/IIS to charge people who want to use their technology if they're using it for profit. It may be ugly and unsavory, but it's nothing to get terribly upset over. I think it'd be far more outrageous if they did decide to charge those of us that just stream for free, totally out of pocket. At the very least, it'll be interesting to see if Frauhofer sues the RIAA members over providing (for pay) m...

...lt;/label><%= text_field_with_auto_complete :book, :title %> <%= submit_tag ''Go'' %> This works fine except that some of the views on which this top search bar appears are edit and create forms for books. So, they also have input fields for :book, :title. Two unsavory results of this are 1) The title of any book the user is editing gets inserted in the search bar at top, rather than leaving it blank for a user to add data and 2) If there are any validation errors on the title of a book that a user is editing not only will the title field of the editing...

...c,dc=com?sub nss_base_shadow dc=mydc,dc=com?sub --- The end result is some extra sub queries - which is ok for me. I also get the benefit of having the logical separation between the Users and Computers. I really like that. I am still limited by uid names, and I can think of a few other unsavory situations. However, I do like it that way and it works very nicely. I am glad you got yours going. thanks, Joshua -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signa...

Has anyone considered making a linkable library of the OpenSSH code so that one could programatically interact with ssh? Or is there some other method to accomplish this? Thanks, -Eric

...value from %x.bb2> br label %goto.target.body goto.target.body: %x.merge = phi i64 [%x1, label %goto.target.bb1], [%x1, label %goto.target.bb2] ... With this, we don't change any values used by the callbr instructions, and the return values are extracted correctly. This has the unsavory issue of using stores and loads, but this may be the price we need to pay. Thoughts? -bw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190701/20ab0d9d/attachment-0001.html>

...gt; > > goto.target.body: > > %x.merge = phi i64 [%x1, label %goto.target.bb1], [%x1, label > %goto.target.bb2] > > ... > > > With this, we don't change any values used by the callbr instructions, and > the return values are extracted correctly. This has the unsavory issue of > using stores and loads, but this may be the price we need to pay. > > > Thoughts? > > > The non-fallthrough blocks can have other predecessors, right? If so, I > imagine that you need to also do the following: > Good point! > 1. Store zero (or -1 or some o...

..., but that doesn't seem to me like such a "bad" > deal. I applaud the vorbis effort, don't get me wrong, but I don't think > it's evil for Frauhofer/IIS to charge people who want to use their > technology if they're using it for profit. It may be ugly and unsavory, > but it's nothing to get terribly upset over. I think it'd be far more > outrageous if they did decide to charge those of us that just stream for > free, totally out of pocket. So uh, you think it's worth more for mp3, than the actual music involved? Come on. You think...

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 1:48 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 3:00 PM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:44 PM Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 1:29 PM James Y Knight <jyknight at google.com> >>> wrote:

I know that some of you from the list have asked me in the past for a copy of my CentOS based Linux Firewall document. There are also those that have no clue what I am talking about. This is for the former group... There is a new version of my document out. It's changed quite a bit since the last person asked me for it. Some of the changes are: * Updated the scripts in the Useful Shell