search for: unrouted

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:25:19 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > nscd caches certain things, as does winbind, if you want to run nscd > > with winbind, you need to stop nscd caching the things that winbind > > does, when you do this, nscd isn't caching very much,

I've noted that some weeks ago, but i was upgrading all my PVE cluster so i've considered it benevolent. Yesterday i've updated my main switch, disconnecting for a brief lag of time all my ''infrastructutes''. My SMTP server (exim) start to complain about 'unroutable addresses': 2019-01-16 18:32:40 1gjp3Q-0006aw-TG <= root at sv.lnf.it H=(3jane.sv.lnf.it)

Sorry. Still on this issue. Today i'm upgrading my DC (with latest 4.5 from louis repo). Note that i've 7 DC in total. In site 'PP' i've upgraded samba, then rebooted the container. reboot on 'vdcpp2' happen on: Feb 11 13:59:52 vdcpp2 shutdown[33452]: shutting down for system reboot at '14:00:30' bind, ntp and (i suppose) samba was stared. After that,

Hi all! I am a long time lurker, but have not posted until now. My old trusted firewall machine broke a couple of weeks ago and I replaced it with a XEN domU that is using DNAT and has two interfaces. The firewall domU and the FTP server domU are both guests on the same dom0. All three machines are running Debian/etch (stable) and Shorewall has version 3.2.6. I can''t get FTP to work

On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:47:01 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Sorry. Still on this issue. > > Today i'm upgrading my DC (with latest 4.5 from louis repo). Note that > i've 7 DC in total. > > In site 'PP' i've upgraded samba, then rebooted the container. reboot > on 'vdcpp2' happen on: > > Feb

...power supply to the card and I have even tried moving the card from slot 1 to 2 on the board. Below is from the console when I try to route a call from FXO on slot 4 to the FXS on slot 2.? Notice the FXS is "ringing" ? -- Executing [s at incoming:1] Verbose("Zap/4-1", "1|Unrouted call handler") in new stack ?Unrouted call handler ??? -- Executing [s at incoming:2] Answer("Zap/4-1", "") in new stack ??? -- Executing [s at incoming:3] Wait("Zap/4-1", "1") in new stack ??? -- Executing [s at incoming:4] Dial("Zap/4-1", &qu...

Hai Marco, > Yesterday i've updated my main switch, disconnecting for a > brief lag of time all my ''infrastructutes''. > > My SMTP server (exim) start to complain about 'unroutable addresses': > > 2019-01-16 18:32:40 1gjp3Q-0006aw-TG <= root at sv.lnf.it > H=(3jane.sv.lnf.it) [10.5.1.13] P=esmtp S=655 > id=20190116173240.C20003CE035A

Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases, I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about unreceived logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and found that my ISP is rejecting the mail because it is seeing an envelope carrying my local address. My suspicion is that the mail is going out via sendmail instead of

I have had Shorewall 2.0.8 up and running for a month or so. Now I need to change some things around. Currently I am running on a private IP scheme and Shorewall is setup based on the 3 interface guide. Now I want to change to a public scheme on my "loc" zone. I have a /24 block of public IP''s. I need my private scheme and public to co-exist so I currently have is eth1 (local)

No, i don't think this is a configuration error by mine, and still seems that ''something'' in winbind does not work properly, or at least in respect to exim. This late evening i've rebooted all my servers in a site (2DM, 2DC; DM samba 4.8, DC samba 4.5). I've firstly rebooted the DM (where one of these is the mail server), after that, and after verify that all work

I'm scratching my head here a little. And my post to the openvpn mailing list is not getting any attention. I have an openvpn server working with Windows clients and I thought I'd try to get a client config on a CentOS box running. The client is a minimal install of CentOS and I like to use shorewall (3.2.x). I've tried to run the vpn client with the fw off and on with no change.

I have a box running *@Home 1.0 and I noticed today when I went to change some settings to do with the DID's that it is no longer detecting the different lines. I have a Digium 4 port line card and Im pretty sure that the DID's used to work when I used fxs_ks signaling on them. However I changed to fxs_ls signaling because the ks wasn't detecting when people were hanging up properly.

Hi there. I''ve two Internet connections at the same box, one connection is made through ADSL, and another is made with a Radio-Link (WaveLAN IE822). I wan''t to do a backup connection with the ADSL link. With what tools I can do this? ipchains, iptables, a third party tool? -- ____________________________________________________________ PIII 500MHz - 98MB RAM -

Okay, first a little background - I've been with Packet8 since a month after they started. I found that we were outgrowing their services and decided to move to an asterisk box in the office. I found a service provider that offered me a reasonable rate. After a fair ammount of testing I decided to stick with their services and port my 3 primary DID's from Packet8 to the new service.

Dear all, Has anyone experienced this whilst running DRBD over eth1 between two CentOS 5.7 servers? eth1 is a private IP address, unroutable. eth0 is the public address. CentOS will reply sometimes once every 3 days or every 14mins~ saying "My public IP is on eth1" to arp requests when it's not, it's eth0. This freezes traffic and causes issues. We've looked at arp*

...er zones. They do however do IP Masq, where we actually have a Class C assigned to us (What can I say, I got it before they locked down :-) I believe that the masking is where my problem is.. The tunnel looks good when running the ipsec look command on both sides. When I ping/telnet to a "unrouted" IP for a machine on the other end, I see the ifconfig -ni RX-OK go up on the ipsec0 interface, and the TX-DROP also go up.. I''ve looked for what causes this, all I can come up with, is that the Masking is happening before it sends the traffic out the ipsec0 interface back to our loc...

...y incoming calls are not finding the "s" extension in my dial-plan. I am assuming SIP calls can do this. I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.1 sip.conf has nothing but: [general] context=incoming extensions.conf has: [globals] [general] autofallthrough=yes [default] ;exten => s,1,Verbose(1,Unrouted call handler) ;exten => s,n,Answer() ;exten => s,n,Wait(1) ;exten => s,n,Playback(tt-weasels) ;exten => s,n,Hangup() [incoming] exten => s,1,Answer() exten => s,n,Playback(hello-world) exten => s,n,Hangup() [internal] ;exten => 515,1,Verbose(1,Echo test application) ;exten...

...ack == Spawn extension (phones, 500, 2) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/yassen-2' -- Hungup 'IAX2/yassen-2' -----cut here----------------------------------- My extentions.conf: -----cut here----------------------------------- [globals] [general] [default] exten => s,1,Verbose(1|Unrouted call handler) exten => s,n,Answer() exten => s,n,Wait(1) exten => s,n,Playback(tt-weasels) exten => s,n,Hangup() [outgoing_calls] [incoming_calls] [internal] exten => 500,1,Verbose(1|Echo test application) exten => 500,n,Echo() exten => 500,n,Hangup() exten => 501,1,Verb...

...right at the beggining of the controller method does not get triggered. It happens on a form submission. I can make changes to the object model from with the console, but not on this form submission. I thought maybe it was routing, because I have routing in place on this method, but if I go to the unrouted url, I still get the same error message. So, on a form submission, I get the following error: (it is not the regular rails error message, but a un-formatted error message) cannot convert String into Integer ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/cgi_ext/cgi_methods.rb...

Hai Marco, Maybe the winbind cache time is set to low for this. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 17 januari 2019 15:55 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Winbind, cached logons and 'user > persistency'... >