search for: unrout

On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 17:25:19 +0100 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > nscd caches certain things, as does winbind, if you want to run nscd > > with winbind, you need to stop nscd caching the things that winbind > > does, when you do this, nscd isn't caching very much,

I've noted that some weeks ago, but i was upgrading all my PVE cluster so i've considered it benevolent. Yesterday i've updated my main switch, disconnecting for a brief lag of time all my ''infrastructutes''. My SMTP server (exim) start to complain about 'unroutable addresses': 2019-01-16 18:32:40 1gjp3Q-0006aw-TG <= root at sv.lnf.it H=(3jane.sv.lnf.it) [10.5.1.13] P=esmtp S=655 id=20190116173240.C20003CE035A at 3jane.sv.lnf.it 2019-01-16 18:33:45 1gjp3Q-0006aw-TG ** gaio at fvg.lnf.it <root at sv.lnf.it> F=<root at sv.lnf.it>: Unrou...

...;runing. But the mail server refuse to deliver messages, fortunately all admin messages to an admin users (was loop: messages undeliverability errors, email go to postmaster, so to admin, so error, ...). 2019-02-11 14:02:34 1gtBEG-0006lw-Qm ** admin123 at fvg.lnf.it F=<root at pp.lnf.it>: Unrouteable address 2019-02-11 14:02:35 1gtBEI-0006nz-CH ** admin123 at fvg.lnf.it F=<root at sv.lnf.it>: Unrouteable address 2019-02-11 14:02:38 1gtBEL-0006pl-P3 ** admin123 at fvg.lnf.it F=<>: Unrouteable address [...] 2019-02-11 14:05:18 1gtBGv-0007IA-QR ** admin123 at fvg.lnf.it F=<...

...FTP server domU are both guests on the same dom0. All three machines are running Debian/etch (stable) and Shorewall has version 3.2.6. I can''t get FTP to work and Filezilla says: Response: 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,221,239,19) Status: Server sent passive reply with unroutable address. Using server address instead. I cannot understand why the FTP servers private address is leaked since the modules ip_nat_ftp and ip_conntrack_ftp are loaded. The FTP rule is "FTP/DNAT net loc:192.168.221.3". In the attached status file I have connected from "21...

...erver refuse to deliver messages, fortunately all admin > messages to an admin users (was loop: messages undeliverability > errors, email go to postmaster, so to admin, so error, ...). > > 2019-02-11 14:02:34 1gtBEG-0006lw-Qm ** admin123 at fvg.lnf.it > F=<root at pp.lnf.it>: Unrouteable address 2019-02-11 14:02:35 > 1gtBEI-0006nz-CH ** admin123 at fvg.lnf.it F=<root at sv.lnf.it>: > Unrouteable address 2019-02-11 14:02:38 1gtBEL-0006pl-P3 ** > admin123 at fvg.lnf.it F=<>: Unrouteable address [...] 2019-02-11 > 14:05:18 1gtBGv-0007IA-QR ** admin123 at f...

...power supply to the card and I have even tried moving the card from slot 1 to 2 on the board. Below is from the console when I try to route a call from FXO on slot 4 to the FXS on slot 2.? Notice the FXS is "ringing" ? -- Executing [s at incoming:1] Verbose("Zap/4-1", "1|Unrouted call handler") in new stack ?Unrouted call handler ??? -- Executing [s at incoming:2] Answer("Zap/4-1", "") in new stack ??? -- Executing [s at incoming:3] Wait("Zap/4-1", "1") in new stack ??? -- Executing [s at incoming:4] Dial("Zap/4-1", &...

Hai Marco, > Yesterday i've updated my main switch, disconnecting for a > brief lag of time all my ''infrastructutes''. > > My SMTP server (exim) start to complain about 'unroutable addresses': > > 2019-01-16 18:32:40 1gjp3Q-0006aw-TG <= root at sv.lnf.it > H=(3jane.sv.lnf.it) [10.5.1.13] P=esmtp S=655 > id=20190116173240.C20003CE035A at 3jane.sv.lnf.it > 2019-01-16 18:33:45 1gjp3Q-0006aw-TG ** gaio at fvg.lnf.it > <root at sv.lnf.it> F...

Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases, I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about unreceived logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and found that my ISP is rejecting the mail because it is seeing an envelope carrying my local address. My suspicion is that the mail is going out via sendmail instead of

I have had Shorewall 2.0.8 up and running for a month or so. Now I need to change some things around. Currently I am running on a private IP scheme and Shorewall is setup based on the 3 interface guide. Now I want to change to a public scheme on my "loc" zone. I have a /24 block of public IP''s. I need my private scheme and public to co-exist so I currently have is eth1 (local)

...d at least 5 minutes, the rebooted the other DC, and i've catch: ==> /var/log/exim4/mainlog <== 2019-03-26 18:21:19 H=(fouc.pp.lnf.it) [10.27.1.254] X=TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128 CV=no F=<service at external-service.com> rejected RCPT <local_user at fvg.lnf.it>: Unrouteable address (again 'Unrouteable address' is by design in my exim configuration, effectively seems as user desappear from NSS) 'local user' exist, in fact one minute later: 2019-03-26 18:22:08 1h8pm0-00027Q-No => local_user <local_user at fvg.lnf.it> F=<logcheck at fv...

...ything on the vpn net or the internal net. As near as I can tell no options are being pushed and the tun interface is not being set up. Running an ifconfig does not show the interface (it does show up on the server). The log is being spammed by this: Aug 28 13:54:06 host openvpn[5196]: TLS Error: Unroutable control packet received from x.x.x.x:1194 (si=3 op=P_CONTROL_V1) Aug 28 13:54:06 host last message repeated 7 times Aug 28 13:54:07 host openvpn[5196]: TLS Error: Unroutable control packet received from x.x.x.x:1194 (si=3 op=P_ACK_V1) I have the same options in my client config as I do on wind...

...operly? My other problem is getting sendmail to work. I get the following error. ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to <my smtp server, details removed>: >>> DATA <<< 550-Verification failed for <admin@asterisk1.local> <<< 550-unrouteable mail domain "asterisk1.local" <<< 550 Sender verify failed 550 5.1.1 <users email address, details removed>... User unknown <<< 503 valid RCPT command must precede DATA I cant find anywhere to change the login/pass info to change it to auth with a valid acco...

Hi there. I''ve two Internet connections at the same box, one connection is made through ADSL, and another is made with a Radio-Link (WaveLAN IE822). I wan''t to do a backup connection with the ADSL link. With what tools I can do this? ipchains, iptables, a third party tool? -- ____________________________________________________________ PIII 500MHz - 98MB RAM -

Okay, first a little background - I've been with Packet8 since a month after they started. I found that we were outgrowing their services and decided to move to an asterisk box in the office. I found a service provider that offered me a reasonable rate. After a fair ammount of testing I decided to stick with their services and port my 3 primary DID's from Packet8 to the new service.

Dear all, Has anyone experienced this whilst running DRBD over eth1 between two CentOS 5.7 servers? eth1 is a private IP address, unroutable. eth0 is the public address. CentOS will reply sometimes once every 3 days or every 14mins~ saying "My public IP is on eth1" to arp requests when it's not, it's eth0. This freezes traffic and causes issues. We've looked at arp* /etc/sysctl.conf etc. and arptables, but won...

...er zones. They do however do IP Masq, where we actually have a Class C assigned to us (What can I say, I got it before they locked down :-) I believe that the masking is where my problem is.. The tunnel looks good when running the ipsec look command on both sides. When I ping/telnet to a "unrouted" IP for a machine on the other end, I see the ifconfig -ni RX-OK go up on the ipsec0 interface, and the TX-DROP also go up.. I''ve looked for what causes this, all I can come up with, is that the Masking is happening before it sends the traffic out the ipsec0 interface back to our l...

...y incoming calls are not finding the "s" extension in my dial-plan. I am assuming SIP calls can do this. I am using Asterisk 1.6.1.1 sip.conf has nothing but: [general] context=incoming extensions.conf has: [globals] [general] autofallthrough=yes [default] ;exten => s,1,Verbose(1,Unrouted call handler) ;exten => s,n,Answer() ;exten => s,n,Wait(1) ;exten => s,n,Playback(tt-weasels) ;exten => s,n,Hangup() [incoming] exten => s,1,Answer() exten => s,n,Playback(hello-world) exten => s,n,Hangup() [internal] ;exten => 515,1,Verbose(1,Echo test application) ;ext...

...ack == Spawn extension (phones, 500, 2) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/yassen-2' -- Hungup 'IAX2/yassen-2' -----cut here----------------------------------- My extentions.conf: -----cut here----------------------------------- [globals] [general] [default] exten => s,1,Verbose(1|Unrouted call handler) exten => s,n,Answer() exten => s,n,Wait(1) exten => s,n,Playback(tt-weasels) exten => s,n,Hangup() [outgoing_calls] [incoming_calls] [internal] exten => 500,1,Verbose(1|Echo test application) exten => 500,n,Echo() exten => 500,n,Hangup() exten => 501,1,Ve...

...right at the beggining of the controller method does not get triggered. It happens on a form submission. I can make changes to the object model from with the console, but not on this form submission. I thought maybe it was routing, because I have routing in place on this method, but if I go to the unrouted url, I still get the same error message. So, on a form submission, I get the following error: (it is not the regular rails error message, but a un-formatted error message) cannot convert String into Integer ./script/../config/../vendor/rails/actionpack/lib/action_controller/cgi_ext/cgi_methods....

...logons and 'user > persistency'... > > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > Your Exim is not complaining about users, but is > complaining about a non deliverable message, > > due to not reaching the destination ip adres. ( Unrouteable > address ) > > No, i'ts an ACL that reply 'Unroutable address' for non > existant users. > Don't help spammers to find useful address. ;-) > > -- > dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG > Key ID: 240A3D66 > Associazione ``La Nostra Famigli...