search for: unreliable

I have been using rsync for the last year or so. Generally I am very pleased with the performance and features, but I am forced to use a rather unreliable link to one of my mirrors. Consequentially rsync often bails out with a protocol error in the middle of a large session due to transient misbehaviour on the link. This appears to abort the whole transfer. One solution would appear to be an option to log the error then attempt the next file in t...

Hi, I'm getting unreliable dtmf recognition (it works fine for 4-5 digits, errors (duplicates) on more), when transferred inband from gsm gateway to NT port of quadbri under bristuffed Asterisk..... Since Asterisk is claimed to have good dtmf recognizer, I suspect there are some settings to workarouned... I've tried...

Hi, I have a running asterisk 1.2.1 (bristuffed) with a TDM400 Board. Connected to 1 port is am ordanary Fax Machine. Everything 'seems' to work, however receiving faxes is very unreliable. Sometimes I receive a normal page, without problems. Sometimes half of a page and the rest is scrambled, but most often, I receive nothing and the other site reports a Fax error... The Fax machine works very reliable with a standard Telco POTS line. Who has a 'good' working solution to...

A lot of people have complained about unreliable connections to W2K and XP machines. The folowing patch solved the problems for us. I have no idea why it works, but after this patch we had no more problems connecting to workstations in the domain. --- samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-06 22:08:41.000000000 +0100 +++ samba-3.0...

Hi I saw your post about bug in Samba 3.0.1: Quote: ????A lot of people have complained about unreliable connections to W2K and XP machines. The folowing patch solved the problems for us. I have no idea why it works, but after this patch we had no more problems connecting to workstations in the domain. --- samba-3.0.2pre1/source/rpc_parse/parse_net.c 2004-01-06 22:08:41.000000000 +0100 +++ samba-3.0...

...n it on the same host (as 2 processes), it runs as I expect -- forever -- even on a samba share (talking to the same smbd on other side). To be fair, it fails on NFS as well -- immediately, just the message is different ("unlink: No such file or directory"). This is why I think it's unreliable on ANY or most network filesystems. But I'd like to be sure, of course. :-) May be it's just out config error... What do you think? Thanks, -- Egon Eckert, Heaven Industries, s.r.o. E-mail: egon@heaven.industries.cz

Anyone have any insight as to why voip-info.org has been up and down all day, and more importantly unreliable for the last month? I assume the bandwidth is being donated or something, but surely someone would be willing to donate reliable bandwidth as the knowledge hosted on the site (which is also donated!) is worth way more than the bandwidth. There is no doubt it is the best documentation that e...

Is dovecot still considered unreliable when combined with NFS? Is this true for mbox only, or Maildir as well? If dovecot Is still considered unreliable with NFS, how about having a dovecot mode that would chain into procmail for delivery, so that dovecot doesn't (necessarily) have to reinvent that wheel? Thanks!

Dear Sirs & Madams: Thank you so much for your help. To remind, my situation is a wireless connection that is unreliable, where: (a) upon disconnect, !M's nxclient does not recognize connection death (b) after I manually kill nxssh and reconnect, reconnection takes some time. My idea: intercept myself in between NX client and server - detect connection drop, and reconnect. This is proving quite difficult. My pr...

...le name, rsync should continue from about where it left off. -----Original Message----- From: rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of net.rsync at io7m.com Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 9:03 AM To: rsync at lists.samba.org Subject: Dealing with an unreliable remote 'Lo. I've run into a frustrating issue when trying to synchronize a directory hierarchy over a reliable (but slow) connection to an unreliable remote. Basically, I have the following: http://mvn-repository.io7m.com/com/io7m/ This is a set of nested directories containing binar...

...M400P) cards and i get this error message on the asterisk console: == Starting post polarity CID detection on channel 4 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1' [Jul 8 11:58:55] WARNING[9539]: callerid.c:219 callerid_get_dtmf: Couldn't detect start-character. CID parsing might be unreliable A long time ago my CallerID used to work with the same settings. I don't really need CallerID but it would be nice to have it working. I am located in The Netherlands. Any suggestions? This is in my /etc/zaptel.conf : fxoks=1 fxsks=4 loadzone=nl defaultzone=nl This is in my /etc/asteris...

After upgrading from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2a, accessing a shared folder has become unreliable: after being able to access my shares for some time I get an error message "No domain contoller was available" (actually, I'm paraphrasing that one, I unfortunately did not record it verbatim). Host linux log contains the following error message for each access: Mar 5 20:07:08 shar...

On 25.11.2014 15:02, net.rsync at io7m.com wrote: > 'Lo. > > I've run into a frustrating issue when trying to synchronize a > directory hierarchy over a reliable (but slow) connection to an > unreliable remote. Basically, I have the following: > > http://mvn-repository.io7m.com/com/io7m/ > > This is a set of nested directories containing binaries and sources for > projects I develop/maintain. Every time a new release is made, I deploy > the binaries and sources to an exact co...

Hello, I'm managing smaller private virtualization infrastructure, currently based on CentOS 7.x. In the past we were running mostly on Debian 7 (kernel 3.2.x) and CentOS 6.x without problems. After we have upgraded to CentOS 7.x, I have experienced occasional physical host crashes when I did e.g. suspend or resume more virtual machines OR random virtual machine checkpoint was invalid and VM

On Sun 03 Feb 2019, Philip Rhoades via rsync wrote: > > For some years I have been using rsync quite happily to send / retrieve > files to / from SSHDroid Pro but recently I have started having a problem > when transferring large numbers of file - I am pretty sure it started after > upgrading from Fedora x86_64 28 to 29 - but I am not 100% sure. Below is [...] > Corrupted MAC

Hi, I'm getting unusable DTMF detection with DISA on incoming ZAP channel (bristuffed *) on quadbri from GSM gateway. DTMF detection works ok in normal ISDN incoming line. How can I check what's going on ? What settings to check ? Anyone with more experience on such scenarios ? Thanks in advance, regards, Rob.

We're trying to use some AudioCodes MP104 FXO units as gateways to Asterisk but cannot get them to reliably detect DTMF. Some landline calls get most digits but some are duplicated. Some cell phone calls get 0% DTMF recognition. Anyone with experience with these units have any suggestions? ABP Technical Support has been unable to diagnose the problem and is now sending random guesses and

Hi, My problem is related to a bug in the Asterisk bug database: (Bug 2773) http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=2773 Essentially, when one has a call going over more than one IAX legs, the audio is not transferred *sometimes*. This is quite randomly observed. With "notransfer=yes", the problem goes away. In my situation, the IAX channels originate from 2 Asterisk servers themselves -

Hi all, I just installed Cepstral and app_swift version 1.4.2 on my Asterisk 1.4.22.1 box. It seems to work great with one exception. If I play a test message with instructions to collect a maximum of 5 digits, it collects those 5 digits correctly if the user waits for the message to complete before entering them. But if the user barges in with digits before the message completes, the detected

Full_Name: Scott Wilkinson Version: 2.3.1 OS: WinXP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (140.253.203.4) In the example below round() does not report to the specified number of digits when the last digit to be reported is zero: Compare behaviour for 0.897575 and 0.946251. Ditto for signif(). The number of sigfigs is ambiguous unless the reader knows this behaviour. Is this a bug or intended behaviour? Is