search for: unreach

...ed the command "ip -6 addr add 2001:DB8:CAFE:1111::12/64 dev eth0" to add ipv6 address and can see it in ifconfig but can't ping it Why? Thank you # ping6 2001:db8:cafe:1111::12 PING 2001:db8:cafe:1111::12(2001:db8:cafe:1111::12) 56 data bytes >From ::1 icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable >From ::1 icmp_seq=2 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable >From ::1 icmp_seq=3 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable >From ::1 icmp_seq=5 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable >From ::1 icmp_seq=6 Destination unreachable: Address unreachabl...

Whatever we end up deciding, I think we do need to preserve the ability of a language frontend to generate complete garbage in the form of unreachable code. If we decide to move in the direction of disallowing the production of unreachable code, we need to write a canonicalization pass that runs first thing in the pipeline. A frontend should be able to produce unreachable code. This enables important simplifications in the frontend. I...

Rowland, To answer you first, my "example.com" registered host is a wildcat " *. example.com". Everything example.com returns my external ip address. Both bind9 and samba are running. Might add your "options" but for now, solving my problem, first. Louis, your answer in a few minutes. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at

...name resolution [Mar 21 09:57:04] WARNING[6748] acl.c: Unable to lookup 'pbx2.server.com' ----------------------------------------------------------------THEN ------------------------------------------------------------- [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'YYYY' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 10 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'C1045' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 140 [Mar 21 09:57:04] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: Peer 'XXXX' is now UNREACHABLE! Last qualify: 33 [Mar 21 09:57:15] NOTICE[6748] chan_sip.c: -- Registration for '8...

...=exited, > > status=0/SUCCESS) > >? Main PID: 395 (named) > >? ? ?Tasks: 5 (limit: 2249) > >? ? Memory: 27.7M > >? ? CGroup: /system.slice/bind9.service > >? ? ? ? ? ? ??????395 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > > > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:500:2f::f#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:503:c27::2:30#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving &...

Hello, I encountered a problem triggered by Jump-Threading optimization. This pass is creating an unreachable block with an instruction that is not well formed, which then causes the subsequent GVN pass to enter an infinite loop. I have submitted a bug report and proposed fix to llvm-commits. This bug opened a can of worms. I was asked to move the discussion to llvm-dev to reach for a wider audience...

...cho request, id 1, seq 17, length 40 01:00:25.154706 IP 192.168.1.2 > 10.0.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 17, length 40 01:00:25.154706 IP 192.168.1.2 > 10.0.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 17, length 40 01:00:25.155177 IP 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: ICMP 10.0.0.2 protocol 1 port 19786 unreachable, length 68 01:00:25.155225 IP 192.168.1.1 > 192.168.1.2: ICMP 10.0.0.2 protocol 1 port 19786 unreachable, length 68 01:00:26.157248 ethertype IPv4, IP 192.168.1.2 > 10.0.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 1, seq 18, length 40 01:00:26.157248 IP 192.168.1.2 > 10.0.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 1,...

...=exited, > > status=0/SUCCESS) > > Main PID: 395 (named) > > Tasks: 5 (limit: 2249) > > Memory: 27.7M > > CGroup: /system.slice/bind9.service > > ??????395 /usr/sbin/named -u bind > > > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:500:2f::f#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving ' > > dtdc1.ad.dtntwk.work/A/IN': 2001:503:c27::2:30#53 > > Sep 30 07:19:27 dtdc1 named[395]: network unreachable resolving &...

...ebruary 2015 at 02:05, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Will try to reply to the larger thread again soon, but a quick reply on a > bit of a tangent... > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: >> >> 2. Should unreachable code be allowed to contain nonsense (like >> instructions that depend on themselves)? To this, I believe the answer is >> no. We currently permit this, and I think that a lot of the bugs regarding >> unreachable code some from this. I've yet to hear a good argument why, fo...

...<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com>, "David Majnemer" > <david.majnemer at gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 10:32:30 PM > Subject: Re: Jump Theading/GVN bug - moving discussion to llvm-dev > > > So, first things first. > > > Handling unreachable code is annoying. I agree. However, its > important to characterize how annoying. Most code is not > unreachable, and we're (obviously) fine just bailing on such crazy > code paths. So in practice the common cost is keeping a local set to > detect cycles in the graph where we ar...

I must have something mis-configured in my bond setup. Things are working, but I'm getting TONS of this sort of stuff in my log: +2001:502:ad09::4#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving 'kns1.kuwaitnet.net/A/IN': +2001:503:231d::2:30#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving 'kns1.kuwaitnet.net/A/IN': +2001:503:a83e::2:30#53: 1 Time(s) network unreachable resolving 'kns1.kuwaitnet.net/AAAA/IN': +2001:503:231d::2:30#53: 1 Time(s)...

...Y (SERVER ZONE) ?----? SERVER A (192.168.3.1) Question: On home side (OpenWrt Router) and company side (Windows 7 PC), I can ping all the IP addresses. But on Home PC (Behind the OPENWRT Router), I cannot ping to Company (Windows 7 PC) and Company (Server A). The PING RESULT is destination host unreachable. Any idea about that? IP Allocation - LAN a. Home ? 192.168.1.0/24 b. Company ? 192.168.2.0/24 c. Company (Server zone)? 192.168.3.0/24 IP Allocation ? LAN (TINC Server) a. Home ? TINC:10.0.0.1/32, LAN:192.168.1.1/32 (OpenWrt Router) b. Company ? TINC:10.0.0.2/32, LAN:192.168....

...before use in block" (IE definition locally > dominates use). > > IE it has to pass both DT->dominates(block(%b), block(%a)) and > DT->dominates(%b, %a). > > LLVM special cases "not reachable from entry", and says that no matter what, > #2 is true if %a is unreachable. > > The code is, IMHO, not even self-consistent > > > // Any unreachable use is dominated, even if Def == User. > if (!isReachableFromEntry(UseBB)) > return true; > > // Unreachable definitions don't dominate anything. > if (!isReachableFromEn...

Name/username Host Dyn Nat ACL Port Status 2011/2011 10.1.1.10 5071 UNREACHABLE 2010/2010 10.1.1.10 5070 UNREACHABLE 2009/2009 10.1.1.10 5069 UNREACHABLE 2008/2008 10.1.1.10 5068 UNREACHABLE 2007/2007 10.1.1.10 5067 UNR...

...etting Windows 10 and Windows 7 laptops to communicate with a Samba server (4.1.17-Debian) running on Rasbian Jesse. Running Wireshark on one of the laptops I notice these sequential packet transfers: Laptop –> Pi BJNP Scanner command: discover Pi –> Laptop ICMP 'Destination unreachable (Port unreachable)' This happens even on a laptop that successfully communicates with the Samba server. Could this indicate a configuration problem? If so, how might I fix it? Best regards David

All, I have an issue with IAX that I can't comprehend. Approximately every eight minutes my servers go unreachable. They stay unreachable for exactly 10ms. I have two servers running IAX and it happens on both servers simultaneously. I have searched the archives and see similar issues, but not the exact same one. I am on the current CVS stable version of *. Also, during IAX calls, every couple of minut...

On 25 February 2015 at 10:58, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Rafael Espíndola > <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Maybe. >> > My view is the ideal is either no-unreachable code, or unreachable >> > blocks >> > only contain terminators. >> >> I am definitely happy with both. What worries me is introducing a >> special dominance rule for unreachable blocks. >> >> >> I don't think that rejecting >> >...

...<sys/time.h> header file in the exploit to make it work. [njyoder@topcat ~/temp]$ uname -a FreeBSD topcat.mine.nu 4.7-RELEASE-p6 FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p6 #21: Sat Mar 1 06:07:58 EST 2003 njyoder@topcat.mine.nu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TOPCAT i386 [njyoder@topcat ~/temp]$ ./evil [+] creating unreachable [+] creating unreachable/iexist [+] chmod 0'ing unreachable [+] d--------- 2 njyoder users 512 Apr 5 17:29 unreachable/ [+] Timing open() on unreachable/iexist [+] Successful: 83 usecs, got m [+] Timing open() on unreachable/non-existant [+] Failure: 22 usecs, got m...

On Oct 22, 2008, at 10:45 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Can't you implement __builtin_assume(cond) to codegen to something >> like: >> >> %cond = i1 ... >> br i1 %cond, label %always, label %never >> never: >> unreachable >> always: > > The code generators will remove the branch to %never. > I already tried this :) What would work is to define > an llvm.abort intrinsic, and do: > > %cond = i1 ... > br i1 %cond, label %always, label %never > never: > call void @llvm.abort()...

...SGI Indigo 2 R8000 machine with IRIX6.1 and it stopped in the middle. Could anyone help me to fix it? Many thanks! p.s.: The last lines of message: : ../lib/libappl.a cd regex; make cc -g -I../include -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -c regcomp.c "regcomp.c", line 753: warning(1110): statement is unreachable break; ^ cc -g -I../include -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -c regerror.c cc -g -I../include -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -c regexec.c "engine.c", line 604: warning(1110): statement is unreachable break; ^ "engine.c", line 610: warning(1110): statement is unreachable break; ^...