search for: unquestionably

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: >> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to: >> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Brian Mathis <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: > CentOS is unquestionably one of the most used Linux distros > in the world, and yet the mailing list is relatively quiet. To me this is > a symptom of a problem, and I feel that it's partially a result of the same > regular people, I think it is generally a good thing when the bulk of the conversation here i...

On 26 July 2016 at 00:08, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > It is unquestionably easier for a contributor to land their backend in-tree > than to maintain it out-of-tree. This is because landing it in tree shifts > the maintenance burden from the *contributor* to the *community*. If there > is low value to the community, then this is a "bad deal” for the project...

...ards, > >> > >> Anthony Liguori > > > > Why do you bring this up? No one advocates any ABI breakage, > > I only suggest extensions. > > It's an ABI breakage. You're claiming that the guests you tested > handle the breakage reasonably but it is unquestionably an ABI breakage. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori Adding BAR is not an ABI breakage, do we agree on that? Disabling IO would be but I am not proposing disabling IO. Guests might disable IO. I propose a way to make virtio still work if they do. This is *fixing* things. Not breakin...

...ards, > >> > >> Anthony Liguori > > > > Why do you bring this up? No one advocates any ABI breakage, > > I only suggest extensions. > > It's an ABI breakage. You're claiming that the guests you tested > handle the breakage reasonably but it is unquestionably an ABI breakage. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori Adding BAR is not an ABI breakage, do we agree on that? Disabling IO would be but I am not proposing disabling IO. Guests might disable IO. I propose a way to make virtio still work if they do. This is *fixing* things. Not breakin...

Hello everyone, This email is a continuation of a discussion from almost a year ago, started back here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html As described in that email, this is a complicated topic and deals with sensitive legal issues. I am not a lawyer, and this email is not intended to be legal advice in the formal sense. That said, I have spoken with many

Hi, The thread titled "Another Fedora Decision" is rapidly turning into a political and opinion driven flame fest that is unsuited for the CentOS mailing list. This list should try and remain focused on CentOS, what we have and keep the area sane for new users as well as old hands to participate in a fair and thoughtful conversation around the CentOS Linux platform and the CentOS

...lps, and please let us know if you find a better or workable way[6] before we do. [1] https://access.redhat.com/articles/1299013#FAQ [2] confirmed by Fred Smith, when he opened this thread. [3] https://github.com/atejeda/openjfx-el [4] https://www.openh264.org/ [5] I need it to work, but I need it unquestionably legal. I may disagree with Patents on math and logic, but they are legal in the country I work in, and thus must not be breached when working for its government. AFAIK some of the needed stuff in ffmpeg is still covered. [6] besides ditching the javafx portions of the program, which is what I am...

...n a function. A clobber outside of an invariant region would "unassign" the location and all of its may-aliases. A store would "assign" the location and all of its must-aliases and "unassign" all of its may-aliases. A load would then use the SSA assignment if one is unquestionably available, or remain in place as a load and then "assign" the load result back to the pointer. No attempt would be made to remove stores during this pass. AliasSetTracker would be helpful as soon as I could get it to optionally keep all of its sets "must alias" instead of down...

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:33 AM, Karthik Bhat <karthikthecool at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > I think it might not be exactly PR13303 which might be causing the > corruption of struct when accessed through GDB. > This seems to be an ABI problem in clang. > The problem seems to be that when we have pass by value of struct > (having indirect arguments) stack is not

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:59:33AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:01:50PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > You mean make BAR0 an MMIO BAR? > > Yes, it would break current windows guests. > > Further, as long as we use same address to notify all queues, > > we would

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 07:59:33AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 03:01:50PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > > You mean make BAR0 an MMIO BAR? > > Yes, it would break current windows guests. > > Further, as long as we use same address to notify all queues, > > we would

...ouble like funnel shift (two variables concatenated and shifted by some amount). Eg, if in pseudo IR we have: %funnel_shift = fshl %x, %y, %sh ; this is problematic because either x or y can be poison, but we may not touch the poison when sh==0 %rotate = fshl %x, %x, %sh ; if x is poison, the op is unquestionably producing poison; there's no sh==0 loophole here On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:12 PM Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Thanks Sanjay! > > I did a quick study of these funnel shifts: > The generic lowering to SDAG is correct for the optimization below. It > actually...

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 9:42 AM Renato Golin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On 19 July 2016 at 17:04, Martin J. O'Riordan via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> > Presumably if my out-of-tree backend

Hi David, I think it might not be exactly PR13303 which might be causing the corruption of struct when accessed through GDB. This seems to be an ABI problem in clang. The problem seems to be that when we have pass by value of struct (having indirect arguments) stack is not aligned properly. I tried realigning the stack for indirect arguments in(TargetInfo.cpp) - ABIArgInfo

...plot.dendrogram() or plot.hclust()---I asked R-help about it a few weeks ago and didn't get any response---so I hacked that functionality into the plot.dendrgram code (see below for hacked function plus examples).... Is there any chance this functionality could be added to the base code? Unquestionably it can be done more elegantly than below, but surely it would be a useful feature to have.... Or is there an easier way of doing this that I have missed? Walton Green * * * my.dend.plot <- function (x, type = c("rectangle", "triangle"), center = FALSE, edge.root = is...

...ariables concatenated and shifted by > some amount). > Eg, if in pseudo IR we have: > %funnel_shift = fshl %x, %y, %sh ; this is problematic because either x or > y > can be poison, but we may not touch the poison when sh==0 > %rotate = fshl %x, %x, %sh ; if x is poison, the op is unquestionably > producing poison; there's no sh==0 loophole here > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 1:12 PM Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Thanks Sanjay! > > I did a quick study of these funnel shifts: > The generic lowering to SDAG is correct for the optimization b...

On 12/02/15 18:08, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Brian Mathis > <brian.mathis+centos at betteradmin.com> wrote: >> CentOS is unquestionably one of the most used Linux distros >> in the world, and yet the mailing list is relatively quiet. To me this is >> a symptom of a problem, and I feel that it's partially a result of the same >> regular people, > > I think it is generally a good thing when the bulk of t...

I have Windows XP on my computer. I am trying to access the audio on a file that my client has sent me. The message says: Codec is missig. Speex Voice A109 is not installed on your computer. When I try to install it from the internet, it tells me it cannot be installed. Can you give me any help on installing Speex Voice A109 so I can access the audio? Ann Felkins 308-235-4416 e-mail:

...nds -- when communicating through certain proxies which try to guess the protocol in use before punching the connection through to the requested server. Particularly stupidly configured proxies may even drop the connection if they never see the client version string from our end. Such proxies are unquestionably broken but they are also painfully common. The attached patch adds an option "SendVersionFirst" which, if we are speaking v2, inverts the old behavior and sends our client version string first, rather than waiting for the server to send its string. I have defaulted it to enabled. This...