search for: unncessari

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "unncessari".

Did you mean: unncessary
2011 Oct 28
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
> BTW, adding explicit library dependencies will make the parallel builds > worse, because you know when a dependency is missing (the build fails) > but you don't know when a dependency is superfluous. Computing the dependencies creates a point in the build that depends on all libraries and all tools depend on it. The explicit dependencies would have to be in a really bad state to
2011 Oct 28
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Upcoming Build System Changes
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> writes: >> BTW, adding explicit library dependencies will make the parallel builds >> worse, because you know when a dependency is missing (the build fails) >> but you don't know when a dependency is superfluous. > > Computing the dependencies creates a point in the build that depends on > all
2008 Jul 03
0
[PATCH] xen: remove load_cr3() from manage.c for ia64 support.
remove load_cr3() from manage.c. It is unncessary and x86 dependent. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> --- drivers/xen/manage.c | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/manage.c b/drivers/xen/manage.c index 2bb268e..e8db90c 100644 --- a/drivers/xen/manage.c +++ b/drivers/xen/manage.c @@ -39,8 +39,6 @@ static int
2011 Sep 15
0
Patch to NUT 2.6.0 two fix two issues
Peter Eriksson <peter at ifm.liu.se> Hi Peter, 2011/5/26 Peter Eriksson <peter at ifm.liu.se> > Please find enclosed a patch to NUT 2.6.0 that solves two long standing > issues for us in "upsmon" when dealing with a remote host that is down that > was supposed to be running a NUT daemon. > > 1. It was leaking non-handled processes - slowly filling up our
2018 May 29
0
[RFC v5 2/5] virtio_ring: support creating packed ring
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:49:11AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2018?05?22? 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > > ---
2018 May 29
2
[RFC v5 2/5] virtio_ring: support creating packed ring
On 2018?05?22? 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >
2018 May 29
2
[RFC v5 2/5] virtio_ring: support creating packed ring
On 2018?05?22? 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >
2008 Oct 15
4
Bad passwords from Vampire / NT migration
I just did a clean install of Fedora 9 onto a Pentium 4 machine. It is actually running SELinux enforcing, but I haven't found any errors related to that so far. It is running Samba 3.2.3-0.20. I am trying to migrate a Windows NT 4.0 domain with about 30 users and 30 computers onto a pure Samba setup, using Samba as the PDC and tdbsam. I have read the HOWTO guide extensively, and
2015 Apr 24
0
[PATCH v16 08/14] pvqspinlock: Implement simple paravirt support for the qspinlock
Provide a separate (second) version of the spin_lock_slowpath for paravirt along with a special unlock path. The second slowpath is generated by adding a few pv hooks to the normal slowpath, but where those will compile away for the native case, they expand into special wait/wake code for the pv version. The actual MCS queue can use extra storage in the mcs_nodes[] array to keep track of state
2015 May 04
1
[PATCH v16 08/14] pvqspinlock: Implement simple paravirt support for the qspinlock
I changed it to the below; I've not gotten around to compiling or even running it yet :-( The biggest change is the pv_hash/pv_unhash functions, which I've rewritten to hopefully be clearer (and also hopefully not wrecked them). I took out the cacheline sized structure which takes out that double loop and simplifies things. I've also added some comments which hopefully explain how/why
2015 May 04
1
[PATCH v16 08/14] pvqspinlock: Implement simple paravirt support for the qspinlock
I changed it to the below; I've not gotten around to compiling or even running it yet :-( The biggest change is the pv_hash/pv_unhash functions, which I've rewritten to hopefully be clearer (and also hopefully not wrecked them). I took out the cacheline sized structure which takes out that double loop and simplifies things. I've also added some comments which hopefully explain how/why
2007 Dec 06
17
HVM Windows: disk image vs. zvol - which is better?
Hi everyone! I''m planning to migrate a little firm''s Windows server to a HVM machine. The test setup woks fine (it''s basically an MSSQL server tied pack of programs for an accountancy office), all programs can reach the mssql from the outside on the hvm windows. If fact it turned out to be so good, that I''m even planning to simply copy the win image(s) to the
2016 Mar 23
1
[PATCH v2 13/18] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:50:37PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:31:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was > > > enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g., > > > webOS, android) uses
2016 Mar 23
1
[PATCH v2 13/18] mm/compaction: support non-lru movable page migration
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:45PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 02:50:37PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:31:02PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > We have allowed migration for only LRU pages until now and it was > > > enough to make high-order pages. But recently, embedded system(e.g., > > > webOS, android) uses
2015 Apr 24
16
[PATCH v16 00/14] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
v15->v16: - Remove the lfsr patch and use linear probing as lfsr is not really necessary in most cases. - Move the paravirt PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK code to an asm header. - Add a patch to collect PV qspinlock statistics which also supersedes the PV lock hash debug patch. - Add PV qspinlock performance numbers. v14->v15: - Incorporate PeterZ's v15 qspinlock patch and improve
2015 Apr 24
16
[PATCH v16 00/14] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
v15->v16: - Remove the lfsr patch and use linear probing as lfsr is not really necessary in most cases. - Move the paravirt PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK code to an asm header. - Add a patch to collect PV qspinlock statistics which also supersedes the PV lock hash debug patch. - Add PV qspinlock performance numbers. v14->v15: - Incorporate PeterZ's v15 qspinlock patch and improve
2018 May 22
9
[RFC v5 0/5] virtio: support packed ring
Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some simple functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost (RFC v4): https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/16/501 Both of ping and netperf worked as expected w/ EVENT_IDX disabled. Ping worked as expected w/ EVENT_IDX enabled, but netperf didn't (A hack has been added in the driver to
2018 May 22
9
[RFC v5 0/5] virtio: support packed ring
Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support in virtio driver. Some simple functional tests have been done with Jason's packed ring implementation in vhost (RFC v4): https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/16/501 Both of ping and netperf worked as expected w/ EVENT_IDX disabled. Ping worked as expected w/ EVENT_IDX enabled, but netperf didn't (A hack has been added in the driver to