search for: unnat

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=554 ------- Additional Comments From kaber@trash.net 2007-03-15 02:53 MET ------- Most likely these packets are considered invalid by connection tracking and therefore not handled by NAT. Try this: iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m state --state INVALID -j DROP -- Configure bugmail:

...on $VLAN gets marked with a fwmark ($VLAN1 = fw1, $VLAN2 = fw2) Outbound traffic gets NAT''ed based on the fwmark to an IP in the subnet Returning traffic gets marked based on the dest IP (one of the subnets) with the same fwmark for the appropriate VLAN returning packets are ''unNAT''ed'' and then routed down the correct VLAN based on the fwmark on the packet. Questions: How will Linux react if I put 192.168.1.1 on >1 interfaces? Does the unNAT''ing of the packets destroy the fwmark? Is there a way of handling kernel based packets (ICMP, ARP respo...

Typically (or at least somewhat occasionally) after a reboot of my shorewall[-lite] machine I find that I end up with conntrack table entries for unNATted connections such as: # conntrack -L -p udp --dport 5060 -d 99.232.11.14 udp 17 59 src=10.75.22.8 dst=99.232.11.14 sport=5060 dport=5060 packets=5472 bytes=3031488 [UNREPLIED] src=99.232.11.14 dst=10.75.22.8 sport=5060 dport=5060 packets=0 bytes=0 mark=1 use=2 These are supposed to be NATt...

ESFQ''s original hashing algorithm never worked particularly well for the src or dst hash types: close IP addresses, such as 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.0.2 often hashed to the same number, even with many different perturbation values. This prevented the src and dst hash types from working adequately with small and medium-sized network ranges. A while ago, I added the src_direct and dst_direct hash

Hello i am trying to use this exmple with SER-0.9.3 but still NATED Clients are not working any other requirement http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=SER+example+NAThelper ----------------------------------------------------------- # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21 2003/06/04 13:47:36 jiri Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters

On 2/19/07, Salatiel Filho <salatiel.filho@gmail.com> wrote: > Well , thanks to imq all my client machines are now shaped and > everything is great ... > But now i have a doubt , is there a way to shape the traffic that goes > to the route [doing a wget from the router for example ]? > > > I have a PREROUTING IMQ0 and a POSTROUTING IMQ1 , everything is > working like

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=554 ------- Additional Comments From fhagur@gmail.com 2007-04-17 05:04 MET ------- I have been wondering about this bug and had similar problems myself here in my Debian system, linux-kernel 2.6.18 iptables 1.3.6. I too saw that some packets became transmitted illegally through the ppp0 interface, when they just shoudn't. What I

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620 Summary: Connection reset by peer Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Platform: i386 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: unknown AssignedTo: laforge at netfilter.org ReportedBy: vshiray at

Hello, I want to use opus codecs for android application.Can I get help for building opus? Which files should I include for building. ? regards, shardul -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20130423/c53dd93c/attachment.htm