search for: unline

hi guys, Just a quick note about adding [SOLVED] tags to the Subject lines on email lists : Dont do it, it does not help and makes no difference to the content - yet, it breaks threading of responses. Unline web forums, email clients will try and thread using the Subject and in-reply-to headers to retain thread sanity. So dont please dont break that, its quite a key part of the whole mailing lists experience for everyone. I understand that some people seem to think that adding that makes it easier...

Full_Name: Byron Ellis Version: R-devel OS: Mac OS X Submission from: (NULL) (24.10.67.29) Unline R CMD INSTALL, R CMD CHECK does not allow --configure-args to be passed. This is unfortunate as R CMD CHECK attempts to build the package, running any configure scripts that may be around thus failing on platforms that require configuration arguments to build properly.

...gcc. For instance, it considers callsite arguments and the effects of optimization enabled by inlining. Now more to the weakness of the inliner: 1) It is bottom up. The inlining is not done in the order based on the priority of the callsites. It may leave important callsites (at top of the cg) unlined due to higher cost after inline cost update. It also eliminates the possibility of inline specialization. To change this, the inliner pass may not use the pass manager infrastructure . (I noticed a hack in the inliner to workaround the problem -- for static functions avoid inlining its callees if...

...considers callsite arguments and the effects of optimization enabled by > inlining. > Now more to the weakness of the inliner: > 1) It is bottom up.  The inlining is not done in the order based on the > priority of the callsites.  It may leave important callsites (at top of the > cg) unlined due to higher cost after inline cost update. It also eliminates > the possibility of inline specialization. To change this, the inliner pass > may not use the pass manager infrastructure .  (I noticed a hack in the > inliner to workaround the problem -- for static functions avoid inlining...

...callsite arguments and the effects of > optimization enabled by inlining. > > Now more to the weakness of the inliner: > > 1) It is bottom up. The inlining is not done in the order based on the > priority of the callsites. It may leave important callsites (at top of > the cg) unlined due to higher cost after inline cost update. It also > eliminates the possibility of inline specialization. To change this, the > inliner pass may not use the pass manager infrastructure . (I noticed a > hack in the inliner to workaround the problem -- for static functions > avoid inl...

...de not to inline bar into foo because it would be more profitable to inline foo into qux. > Now more to the weakness of the inliner: > > 1) It is bottom up. The inlining is not done in the order based on the priority of the callsites. It may leave important callsites (at top of the cg) unlined due to higher cost after inline cost update. It also eliminates the possibility of inline specialization. To change this, the inliner pass may not use the pass manager infrastructure . (I noticed a hack in the inliner to workaround the problem -- for static functions avoid inlining its callees if...

...ffects of >> optimization enabled by inlining. >> >> Now more to the weakness of the inliner: >> >> 1) It is bottom up. The inlining is not done in the order based on the >> priority of the callsites. It may leave important callsites (at top of >> the cg) unlined due to higher cost after inline cost update. It also >> eliminates the possibility of inline specialization. To change this, the >> inliner pass may not use the pass manager infrastructure . (I noticed a >> hack in the inliner to workaround the problem -- for static functions &g...

...ause it would be more profitable to > inline foo into qux. > > > Now more to the weakness of the inliner: > > > > 1) It is bottom up. The inlining is not done in the order based on the > priority of the callsites. It may leave important callsites (at top of the > cg) unlined due to higher cost after inline cost update. It also eliminates > the possibility of inline specialization. To change this, the inliner pass > may not use the pass manager infrastructure . (I noticed a hack in the > inliner to workaround the problem -- for static functions avoid inlining...

This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block

This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block

This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual block

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual

Hi Andi, This patch series implements the Linux Xen guest in terms of the paravirt-ops interface. The features in implemented this patch series are: * domU only * UP only (most code is SMP-safe, but there's no way to create a new vcpu) * writable pagetables, with late pinning/early unpinning (no shadow pagetable support) * supports both PAE and non-PAE modes * xen console * virtual