search for: unix_usernam

...; message. > [2004/02/27 09:24:43, 2] auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305) > check_ntlm_password: authentication for user > [Lex] -> [aludeman] -> [DOMAIN+aludeman] succeeded > > in the source code is: > user_info->smb_name.str, user_info->internal_username.str, unix_username > > So the behavior that I'm seeing is that it's always taking the NT > domain precedence over the local passwd. When DOMAIN+aludeman does > not exist then things behave like I would like them where HOMEGAIN+Lex > maps to unix user aludeman uid. > > Any assistance i...

Hi, I'm on solaris 9, and using winbind to be a part of our NT domain. I'm trying to determine if it's possible to configure winbind/smb so that when the nt login name matches the unix login name the share is mounted using their unix uid. With none matching account names, username map works fine. It doesn't appear that "johnsmith = johnsmith" works in the username map

I'm configuring a standalone server(server role = standalone server) using POSIX ACLs to manage permissions on server. I need to manage permissions(At least basic ones, like read, write) from Windows GUI. Is that possible using standalone? When I try setting permissions on Windows I got this on the log: [2017/10/04 19:07:08.437837, 2] ../source3/smbd/posix_acls.c:3006(set_canon_ace_list)

I sent a request for help on the 21st of January....I waited.....I sent it again on the 24th....I waited.... I sent the same question crafted differently on the 25th.... I waited. The help on this list is horrible..... I am sorry for whining. I talk up open source regularly and I help when I can..... but, the claim of "better" support from the open source community because there are so

...rk in the >>first place :-). >> > >Thought so. It's a bit tricky until you have fixed bugs in that >area of the code. (-: > >>In any case a lot of this stuff will move around a bit as the >>authenticaion subsystem starts passing back info - like the >>unix_username they got and everything they need for a vuser token. >>With that change I'll internalise all this behind the interface. >> >>I'll have a look at all of this when I've got a little less on my plate. >> > >OK - I'll send you any patches if I get around...