search for: unicasted

El 21 de febrero de 2017 7:00:03 GMT-05:00, centos-request at centos.org escribi?: >Send CentOS mailing list submissions to > centos at centos.org > > >From: Kahlil Hodgson <kahlil.hodgson at dp.exchange> >To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network conections problems > >First guess is that you may have two devices on the

Hi. I have the same problem, which described in: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-07/msg00241.html I''m using Debian Squeeze (2.6.32-5-xen-amd64) in Dom0, Xen 4.0.1-rc6, Windows 2008, 2003 x86_64 in domU After installing drivers from http://www.xen.org/files/XenCloud/Software/0.5/XCP-base-0.5.iso, system stops on progress bar in normal boot, but ok in safe mode. In

The following series adds 2 new flags to bridge. One flag allows the user to control whether mac learning is performed on the interface or not. By default mac learning is on. The other flag allows the user to control whether unicast traffic is flooded (send without an fdb) to a given unicast port. Default is on. Changes since v4: - Implemented Stephen's suggestions. Changes since v2: -

In 2012 QEMU added UDP unicast network backend support https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/0e0e7facc775e9bb020314f48751b3d09f316c8b#diff-a0a1810b6e249e68f1a290e37399becb Checked latest libvirt on the git repo, and didn't see this as an option. So tried to use the mcast tunnel mode. I keep getting duplicate packets with BPDUs and LLDP packets going between the Point to point connection

We are having a problem getting a NetApp filer to re-join a samba domain after a move to a new network. The filer worked fine with samba before the move. Apologies in advance for the long missive. I've tried the following: - re-running the CIFS setup program on the filer - removing the problem filer's samba account, replacing it, and re-running the setup program on the filer

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: unicast-flooding-2.6.20.4.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 3300 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20070416/4585d8f0/unicast-flooding-2.6.20.4-0002.bin

On 04/05/2016 03:48 πμ, buddylove wrote: > you have 'a' doubt? > precise your question or do you want to make a quiz here? > > this is f.... icecast and it's a damn good piece of software. > runs like a honey down the nipple, up to 8 streams simultaneously > including shoutcast. > read the docs! > > > > On 04.05.2016 00:15, Fran Delgado wrote: >>

if you read ahead you'll figure that the infrastructure of the network 'en gros' isn't made for it (yet). because of this (and not just because I am a fan of) I propose other trials with overlay networks which could (under proper application) even be more efficient than the multicast protocol(s) itself. Greets and out Gee ... .-. . . On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:

I was already aware if this in the first place :-) On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote: > Hi buddylove, > > In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading > which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between > multicast and unicast communications: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast >

@Phil nice text... just want to mention (or better ask...) what the difference between a protocol which implements multiple connections simultaneously and a protocol implementing multiple connections by connection tracking? In the end... its the same... On 04.05.2016 10:25, Philipp Schafft wrote: > Good morning, > > On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: >> Hi,

Hi buddylove, In addition to the links Philipp provided you, here is some more reading which will hopefully help you better understand the difference between multicast and unicast communications: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicast Cheers, Jordan On 05/04/2016 06:39 AM, buddylove wrote: > @Phil > nice text... > just want to mention (or

Oh, well by your "In the end... its the same..." statement and your question of what the difference is (and mentioning connection tracking which is a completely different subject), I was a bit confused as to your query. Cheers, Jordan On 05/04/2016 09:55 AM, buddylove wrote: > I was already aware if this in the first place :-) > > On 04.05.2016 18:04, Jordan Erickson wrote:

Hi, there! I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found anything. Anyone can help me? Thanks -- Fran Delgado (ThinWay) Tumblr: http://thinway.tumblr.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/thinway -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

also, does unicast individually send out streams to each listener (requiring lots of bandwidth) or does it broadcast a stream and users can "tap in" (low bandwidth)? -------Original Message------- From: "Dan Chokola (webmail)" <teckyd at earthlink.net> Sent: 02/28/03 10:46 PM To: icecast at xiph.org Subject: [icecast] Multicast/Unicast > > what does icecast use?

Hello all, Tomas Bonnedahl and I recently corresponded about a rather odd behaviour with routes in ancillary routing tables. We both receive a "Network is unreachable" error when we try to add gatewayed routes to ancillary tables and the main routing table does not contain an entry for the gateway IP. It seems that unless a route to the gateway IP exists in the main routing table, I

My client Windows XP boxes are failing to register with my WINS server (running nmbd from Samba). I'm puzzled how to figure out what I'm doing wrong. Background: I'm setting up BackupPC to back up my Windows clients using rsync. I've installed cwRsync to the clients. BackupPC uses nmblookup to find the client's IP address given its Windows NETBIOS name. I'm

Hello Everyone, I am relatively new to linux and Samba and I am having some difficulties setting Samba up as a Primary Domain Controller. Ihave read the Pdf document called "Using Samba as a PDC" by developrWorks and I have read most of the Howto documents relating to Samba. When I try to connect to my samba server with Win98se I get the message "no Domain server was able to

Good morning, On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 00:15 +0200, Fran Delgado wrote: > Hi, there! > I have a doubt about if this server supports unicast, multicast or > both. I was looking for information in the web but I couldn't found > anything. Anyone can help me? Icecast2 is a streaming solution that works using HTTP[0]. (HTTPS is also supported using both methods[1].) HTTP uses TCP[2][3]

We recently migrated to an active directory controlled domain with the old linux pdc becoming just a member of the new domain. It previously had served as the WINS server. The WINS server settings update was missed on a few printers and these printers continued sending unicast name registration requests to the linux server. With over 300 requests per second being sent from these printers, it came

Hi! I have printers, files shared to all windoze platforms in my group. Now I want to also access the samba box via a VPN. So configuration: NT----PPTP---NT/RAS-----Linux 7 Any experience with this type of config? Quick test shows the samba host but when I try to access it the network path is not found. Thanks! ++Dirk