search for: unfavorable

Hi! I would like to conduct a Cochran`s Q Test in R, but have not found any suitable function. My first idea was: J <- as.table(matrix(c(6,16,2,4),ncol=2, dimnames = list("C" = c("Favorable","Unfavorable"),"Drug A Favorable"=c("B Favorable","B Unfavorable")))) L <- as.table(matrix(c(2,4,6,6),ncol=2, dimnames = list("C" = c("Favorable","Unfavorable"),"Drug A Unfavorable"=c("B Favorable","B Unfavorable&quo...

Dear Dovecot-Team, I am implementing a plugin (for the pop3/imap process) that requires some data to provided from the authentication phase (a derivative of the password). For that, I have now implemented a passdb plugin that generates this data and I would like to "pass" this data down to the mail process (pop3/imap) via extra_fields in the reply of the authentication. The general idea

...checking one partition (/dev/sda7) in our RAID. When it was done, the files were in the state of August 23 last year, with anything newer either gone or invisible. I guess something went wrong with journaling data. What can I do to restore the current state (except restore from backup, which is an unfavorable option on Saturday morning) ?. Thanks, Boris

will wine deliver the many and varied satellite streamed tv shows that are common for pc (turn your pc into a satellite ect) but don't seam to be available for mac? if so could someone point me in the correct direction. cant afford sky at the moment just been made redundant. [Question]

...s and been under no particular I/O strain (it''s a desktop). Trying to fix this, I unattached the cache (still using /dev/bcache0, but without /dev/sdb3 attached), causing these errors to disappear. As soon as I re-attached /dev/sdb3 they started again, so I am fairly sure it''s an unfavorable interaction between bcache and btrfs. Is this something I should be worried about (they''re only emitted with KERN_INFO?) or just an alignment problem? The underlying HDD is using 4K-Sectors, while the block_size of bcache seems to be 512, could that be the issue here? I''ve also...

Martin, Thanks for the helpful reply. Alas I had forgotten that (implied) unfavorable comparisons of *nix systems with Windows systems would likely draw irate (but always substantive) responses on the R-devel list -- poor phrasing on my part. :) Regardless, let me try to address some of the concerns related to the construction of the MRE itself and try to see if we can clean away t...

...13 08: Success, count = 1, BPT = 0000:0000 old: int13 = f0005c6f int15 = f000f859 int1e = f000efc7 new: int13 = 9ec0000a int15 = 9ec0038c int1e = f000efc7 Loading boot sector... booting... Starting PC DOS... Though, when using any post-3.83 version of MEMDISK, the same disk image results in an unfavorable state. Notably, after booting the image, the system's SATA drive is not visible to the PC-DOS/Ghost environment. MEMDISK is likely the apparent culprit as indicated from the "We lost the last drive in our class of drives" notice during MEMDISK processing. Results below: MEMDISK 4.03:...

...prevent 'degrading' existing IR. What about the ones that were already present in the original input (from C code, e.g.)? I think you just want to add an inverse set of DAGCombine transforms, also guarded with that target hook you added. That way there's no chance to still end up with unfavorable shifts on your target, and no middle-end impact from having more than one canonical representation. > I also need to ask about the best way to present tests cases for that. I learned how to create test files for codegen transforms (IR to Assembly), but now I will be working on the “target Indep...

Hi, Building LLVM with a newer GCC version seems to generate several compiler warnings, some of which look like false positives. For example, the '-Winit-list-lifetime' warning added in GCC9 triggers for one of the constructors for ArrayRef, the one taking an initializer_list. How are false positive warnings dealt with in LLVM in general? It's of course possible to just ignore them

...existing IR. > What about the ones that were already present in the original input > (from C code, e.g.)? > > I think you just want to add an inverse set of DAGCombine transforms, > also guarded with that target hook you added. That way there's no chance > to still end up with unfavorable shifts on your target, and no middle-end > impact from having more than one canonical representation. > > I also need to ask about the best way to present tests cases for that. I > learned how to create test files for codegen transforms (IR to Assembly), > but now I will be working o...

Hello, I have the following situation: A firewall is blocking all SIP and RTP traffic in the side of some of my clients. My clients cannot change settings of the firewall. I need to solve this problem and I need some help from you. I have this idea: implement a SIP user agent which does not use well known SIP ports (uses http port 80 for example) and use other ports that are not blocked

...at about the ones that were already present in the original input >> (from C code, e.g.)? >> >> I think you just want to add an inverse set of DAGCombine transforms, >> also guarded with that target hook you added. That way there's no chance >> to still end up with unfavorable shifts on your target, and no middle-end >> impact from having more than one canonical representation. >> >> I also need to ask about the best way to present tests cases for that. I >> learned how to create test files for codegen transforms (IR to Assembly), >> but now...

Dear all, There have been a variety of discussions on the R list regarding the use of R in clinical trials. The following post from the STATA list provides an interesting opinion regarding why SAS remains so popular in this arena: http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2008-01/msg00098.html Regards, -Cody Hamilton

Hi All, While implementing a custom 16 bit target for academical and demonstration purposes, I unexpectedly found that LLVM was not really ready for 8 bit and 16 bit targets. Let me expose why. Target backends can be divided into two major categories, with essentially nothing in between: Type 1: The big 32 or 64 bit targets. Heavily pipelined with expensive branches, running at clock

This is cross-posted from SO (https://stackoverflow.com/q/47079702/1414455), but I now feel that this needs someone from R-Devel to help understand why this is happening. We are facing a weird situation in our code when using R's [`runif`][1] and setting seed with `set.seed` with the `kind = NULL` option (which resolves, unless I am mistaken, to `kind = "default"`; the default being

So, I hear, in a couple weeks'' time, opensolaris.org is shutting down. What does that mean for this mailing list? Should we all be moving over to something at illumos or something? I''m going to encourage somebody in an official capacity at opensolaris to respond... I''m going to discourage unofficial responses, like, illumos enthusiasts etc simply trying to get people

I was trying to simply test bandwidth that Solaris/ZFS (Nevada b63) can deliver from a drive, and doing this: dd if=(raw disk) of=/dev/null gives me around 80MB/s, while dd if=(file on ZFS) of=/dev/null gives me only 35MB/s!?. I am getting basically the same result whether it is single zfs drive, mirror or a stripe (I am testing with two Seagate 7200.10 320G drives hanging off the same interface