search for: unethicalblogg

I believe the concern here is concentrating on how owning devs + others conduct incremental patch reviews in conformance with the current LLVM/svn based practice. IMHO any automated approach, such as your suggestion, would have to incorporate this concern, while simultaneously not forcing core devs to temporarily stop their current LLVM work in favor of learning a new review process, and

On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:47 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > I don't see the conversion to Git actually happening until someone can clearly demonstrate a win for the open source project. I would think that using git would allow LLVM to setup a system whereby commits are pushed to a special buildbot repository instead of the main repository. If a commit fails to pass the test suite then it would be