Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "unethicalblogger".
2011 Sep 09
0
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
I believe the concern here is concentrating on how owning devs + others
conduct incremental patch reviews in conformance with the current LLVM/svn
based practice. IMHO any automated approach, such as your suggestion, would
have to incorporate this concern, while simultaneously not forcing core devs to
temporarily stop their current LLVM work in favor of learning a new review process,
and
2011 Sep 09
4
[LLVMdev] git Status Update?
On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:47 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I don't see the conversion to Git actually happening until someone can clearly demonstrate a win for the open source project.
I would think that using git would allow LLVM to setup a system whereby commits are pushed to a special buildbot repository instead of the main repository. If a commit fails to pass the test suite then it would be