search for: undermined

Hi, I realise that the GPL license question has been discussed in 2003 and in 2007, extensively. Back then, the conclusion seem to have been that in-process usage is not possible for most use-cases and that instead, a network layer/IPC mechanism is required to use Xapian with any non-GPL software. I think the project is severely undermining its own potential success. I see that there are even

Hi everyone, I found that Clang -O0 performs optimizations that undermine dynamic bug-finding tools. First, most bug finding tools such as ASan, Valgrind, Dr. Memory, Mudflap, Purify and Safe Sulong (on which I am working) rely on detecting errors during the execution of the program. They either insert additional checks during compile-time or during run-time which are executed when the program

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Henry Mason <thefridgeowl at gmail.com> wrote: > This is pretty much what's happening with Portable Native Client, right? > > http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl > > See also the first presentation from the November LLVM meeting: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2010-11/ PNaCl fixes data layout to be just "portable enough" to cover

...nt values from ever spilling from registers to the stack. I've looked for code or documentation on how to do this but haven't found anything, apologies if this has already been done. Recent security research has shown that protection schemes such as CFI (that might otherwise be secure) are undermined by sensitive values spilling to the stack. When security-critical values spill from registers to the stack, they can be read and overwritten by an attacker with arbitrary memory read or write capabilities. See "Losing Control" from CCS 2015 for more details on this sort of attack: https:/...

We're using the SQLite backend for authentication of Postfix SASL. When the db is replaced we HUP dovecot to close and reopen its connection. During this time it appears the socket file is removed and Postfix rejects the authentication attempt. From the logs: Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx dovecot: dovecot: SIGHUP received - reloading configuration Jun 3 00:23:02 xxx postfix/smtpd[14746]: warning:

...LLVM users. The presentations clearly reveal no confidential Apple information; in fact, they were presented in front of a large number of external participants. While we appreciate Apple's continued support of LLVM and of the Developers' Meeting, the goodwill generated is being undermined by this policy to withhold important technical information from other LLVM users, and for little benefit to Apple. --Vikram Adve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VIKRAM S. ADVE Associate Professor, Computer Science E-MAIL: vadve at cs.uiuc.edu S...

Dear shorewall users: I am going to implement VPN IPSEC pass through. Got shorewall as the main firewall interfacing the internet. I found Tom''s documentation on how to do it. The question is: there''s an argument that VPN pass through (pass through NAT) will undermine the importance of AH (source: freeswan site). Is it true? ------------------------ Lito Kusnadi

On 02/04/15 16:45, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > but still no answers can be given correctly, because of no smb.conf is posted by buhorojo. > so question post you : The thread has nothing to do with the buhorojo setup. We are trying to find why sssd-ad cannot be installed alongside sernet. The poster of the thread has a workaround, using sssd, so it's not urgent. What remains unanswered

Hello, i have a linux box which is acting as a lan router towards the internet doing traffic shaping. My link is 10Mbit/s full duplex. I have set some HTB classes with a rate of 20% (2Mbit/s) and a ceil of 95% (9.5Mbit/s). Is such an excursion of bandwidth in the HTB classes feasible for HTB to control? What Timer frequency (kernel menuconfig) is the most suitable among 250, 300 and 1000Hz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 14 May 2014, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 5/13/2014 3:02 PM, Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl> wrote: >> If you know what you are doing (think twice about that!), you can override >> this behavior using the sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient setting (if your >> Pigeonhole is recent enough): >>

Hi, I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in these issues. Quoting Tatu : > We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are

On 08/10/2017 04:41 PM, Frank-Ulrich Sommer wrote: > I can't see any security advantages of a self signed cert. I then you fail to understand the history, like when Microsoft's certs were undermined because the third party authentication agency gave the keys to 2 guys that knocked on the door and asked for them... -- So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998 http://www.mrbrkly...

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 Joachim Schipper wrote: > What this patch does can be described as follows: > > Without: > you at local$ ssh somehost > Enter passphrase for RSA key 'foo': > you at somehost$ exit > $ ssh otherhost > Enter passphrase for RSA key 'foo': > you at otherhost$ > > With: > you at local$ ssh somehost > Enter passphrase for RSA

Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would think that it undermines RH. But I'm still new/old to all of this. It used to be the big argument was between Unix from Berkeley(4.? I think) and SysIII/V. Always always battles for turf.

Hi, On 12/11/12 15:11, Meador Inge wrote: > On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > >>> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been >>> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy >>> to sign up as an owner for that. >> >> I think that "directory level"

In my work with a simple localization plugin, i''m running into a lot of places in the Rails core, where text and other localization specific information is hardcoded. I''ve included some examples in the bottom of this post. It''s hard for an outsider to know, if the hardcoded values are a result of inconsistency in code, or "by design". I hope that we can have

...e > presentations clearly reveal no confidential Apple information; in > fact, they were presented in front of a large number of external > participants. While we appreciate Apple's continued support of LLVM > and of the Developers' Meeting, the goodwill generated is being > undermined by this policy to withhold important technical information > from other LLVM users, and for little benefit to Apple. > > --Vikram Adve > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > VIKRAM S. ADVE > Associate Professor, Computer Science E-...

On 11/11/2012 11:58 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Is there a particular sub-system size that makes sense to mark as owned? I have been >> reworking the library call simplification infrastructure recently and will be happy >> to sign up as an owner for that. > > I think that "directory level" is the right granularity. If you're interested in signing > up

Hi, I am working on a security architecture. In this architecture, the application in DomU has to communicate directly with the hypervisor. But as I can see, the xen architecture allows only DomU kernel to raise a hypercall. I am planning to enable application to communicate with xen directly. I am assuming, setting up a trap gate with Ring-3 access should do the trick. I have few questions

Received this link from a regular email blast, it may interest some of you. I guess RoR is starting to gain more traction :-) http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0606dumbill/?ca=dnw-723 Cheers Mohit.