Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "underlimited".
Did you mean:
undelimeted
2004 Jun 23
0
HTB vs CBQ - is meaning of prio param the same?
...h CBQ and prio set to 1 for EF PHB and prio 2 for
best effort. Although delay does not look like being guaranteed at all for
priority traffic.
Eventually I would like to compare HTB with prio''s to CBQ with prio''s set.
But HTB site says prio is only used for competing for unused (underlimited)
class bandwidths. So please clarify wheather prio parameter has realy
different meaning for CBQ and HTB?
I dont know if what i expect from HTB CBQ (with respect to acting like PRIO
scheduler) comparison makes any sense.
regards
adam f
_______________________________________________
LARTC maili...
2007 Aug 23
5
Help about a QoS configuration
Hi, I would like to make a QoS configuration on a linux based dsl router. It
is for a server, so I want to shape outgoing traffic, incoming traffic
should not be a problem as long as I have a quite assymetric connection. I
would like to achieve the following goals:
1) To have one class (p2p) having all the available bandwith if there is no
activity on other classes.
2) If another class (ftp
2007 Nov 28
5
tc doesn''t shape correct
Hi All,
I''m configuring my natting-firewall to do some tc shaping. Some traffic
has to be shaped on 30mbit, some on 10mbit all the others are unlimited.
The configuring and filtering works correctly. The traffic that is
shaped at 30mbit is correct, but the traffic that is shapped at 10mbit
only gets to 100KB/sec.
It is on a device configured with bonding (both in and out interface).
2002 Sep 06
6
questiona about CBQ algorithm in Linux
Hi Stef and Alexey
I have read some documents about CBQ algorithm from http://www.icir.org/floyd/cbq.html
but still have some question about CBQ in Linux
.
1. First estimator can estimate how much bandwidth already USED per class. one estimating algorithm is EWMA (exponential weighted moving average), how about Linux implemenatation about estimator?
also do you have link for this algorithm? I
2002 May 05
16
More on qdiscs
I notice one other small problem with my modified version of SFQ.
The fact that packets can be dropped at dequeue time is incompatible
with the way HTB (and probably CBQ and others modeled on it) keep
statistics. When I fill a low rate queue causing packets to expire
and be dropped at dequeue I get interesting statistics like this:
This is my variant of SFQ
qdisc plfq 8016: dev eth1
...
Sent