Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "undelimeted".
Did you mean:
undeleted
2006 May 01
2
[LLVMdev] Intel vs. AT&T Assembly.
...rs with %'s).
> Unfortunately GAS has (or commonly available versions have) a number
> of bugs in intel syntax mode (e.g. you can't define a function named
> 'dword'), so we switched to using AT&T syntax.
Ah, OK. The current gas manual says Intel register operands are
undelimeted, i.e. no `%'. Perhaps they've changed.
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html#IDX585
> Intel syntax mode was retained because it's nicer to read :), and
> because it may be useful in the future. As Jeff says, patches are
> welcome...
2006 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] Intel vs. AT&T Assembly.
...Unfortunately GAS has (or commonly available versions have) a number
>> of bugs in intel syntax mode (e.g. you can't define a function named
>> 'dword'), so we switched to using AT&T syntax.
>
> Ah, OK. The current gas manual says Intel register operands are
> undelimeted, i.e. no `%'. Perhaps they've changed.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html#IDX585
Though it really doesn't matter, IIRC, this was to work around bugs in
GAS. In particular (again, as I recall, could be wrong), GAS accepted
regi...
2006 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] Intel vs. AT&T Assembly.
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> We know. Someone offered to do the Intel version, but did little more than a
> huge cut and paste of the AT&T version and then lost interest. No one else
> has had the time or inclination to finish the (barely begun) job. Patches
> accepted :)
Actually, that's not true. The LLVM X86 backend started out emitting
intel mode for
2006 Apr 29
4
[LLVMdev] Intel vs. AT&T Assembly.
We know. Someone offered to do the Intel version, but did little more
than a huge cut and paste of the AT&T version and then lost interest.
No one else has had the time or inclination to finish the (barely begun)
job. Patches accepted :)
Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>> It's a long way towards it:
>>
>> # AT&T. # Intel.