search for: undelimet

...rs with %'s). > Unfortunately GAS has (or commonly available versions have) a number > of bugs in intel syntax mode (e.g. you can't define a function named > 'dword'), so we switched to using AT&T syntax. Ah, OK. The current gas manual says Intel register operands are undelimeted, i.e. no `%'. Perhaps they've changed. http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html#IDX585 > Intel syntax mode was retained because it's nicer to read :), and > because it may be useful in the future. As Jeff says, patches are > welcom...

...Unfortunately GAS has (or commonly available versions have) a number >> of bugs in intel syntax mode (e.g. you can't define a function named >> 'dword'), so we switched to using AT&T syntax. > > Ah, OK. The current gas manual says Intel register operands are > undelimeted, i.e. no `%'. Perhaps they've changed. > > http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html#IDX585 Though it really doesn't matter, IIRC, this was to work around bugs in GAS. In particular (again, as I recall, could be wrong), GAS accepted re...

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Jeff Cohen wrote: > We know. Someone offered to do the Intel version, but did little more than a > huge cut and paste of the AT&T version and then lost interest. No one else > has had the time or inclination to finish the (barely begun) job. Patches > accepted :) Actually, that's not true. The LLVM X86 backend started out emitting intel mode for

We know. Someone offered to do the Intel version, but did little more than a huge cut and paste of the AT&T version and then lost interest. No one else has had the time or inclination to finish the (barely begun) job. Patches accepted :) Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi, > > >> It's a long way towards it: >> >> # AT&T. # Intel.