search for: uncommonly

Hi i have the data in the following format: rent,100,1,common,674 pipe,200,0,usual,864 car,300,1,uncommon,392:jump,700,0,common,664 car,200,1,uncommon,864:snap,900,1,usual,746 stint,600,1,uncommon,257 pull,800,0,usual,594 where as i want the above 6 lines data into 8 lines as below (Spliting row 3 & 4 at : and sending to a new row): rent,100,1,common,674 pipe,200,0,usual,864

Hello! I got an interesting task to make with asterisk: pstn--- * ---sip--- * pstn This sounds common till now. What I have to make is: 1.the call is routed through PSTN to asterisk1 (#1) which has ISDN PRI interface(s) - leg1 2.#1 doesn't pick up the call, neither rejects, it just place into state CALL PROGRESS (?) [maybe gives back alerting tone? probably not] 3.#1 notifies that there is

I'm setting up a test server with a Digium TE122 and am getting the following error on the console, spewing as fast as it can. Does anyone have any idea what this error might be? [Oct 19 11:24:53] NOTICE[2076]: chan_dahdi.c:3108 my_handle_dchan_exception: PRI got event: Event 59 (59) on D-channel of span 2

Hi Talin, Sorry to interject - > For example, suppose I have a type "String or (float, float, float)" - that > is, a union of a string and a 3-tuple of floats. Most of the time what LLVM > will see is { i1; { float; float; float; } } because that's bigger than { > i1; String* }. LLVM won't even know there's a pointer in there, except > during those brief

Hello, Quick question: Can Samba host Work Folders? I've just started looking at the issue and the "feature" does require a server role, which I suppose is some new protocol that may not be implemented in Samba. Thanks Philippe The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon. <Anonymous>

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Joshua Warner <joshuawarner32 at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi Talin, > > Sorry to interject - > > >> For example, suppose I have a type "String or (float, float, float)" - >> that is, a union of a string and a 3-tuple of floats. Most of the time what >> LLVM will see is { i1; { float; float; float; } } because that's

Rails has many built in validation methods to ensure that an ActiveRecord instance cannot be created or updated under certain situations (typically caused by invalid data). However, I can find no methods to govern whether an ActiveRecord instance can be destroyed. Essentially, I wish an error to be raised when a user tries to delete an ActiveRecord without first adhering to a certain set of

5-foot pencils? Gallon-sized coffee mugs? 10-pound chocolate bars? Yes! Yes! Yes! And yes to dozens of other common objects in uncommonly BIG sizes! That's what GreatBigStuff.com is all about! Thank you for your interest in http://www.GreatBigStuff.com. This message is to verify that you wish to have your email address: rsync@lists.samba.org added to the GreatBigStuff.com mailing list. When you confirm, you will receive...

Hi I am searching for a way to do something like "ABC" -> c("A","B","C"). How can this be accomplished? I tried cut() and split(), but they do something else, it seems. The purpose for doing this is to find the number of common (and uncommon) characters, i.e. ultimately I want something like this: > foo("ABD","ADE") c(2,1) # 2

Hi, we plan to remove -fsanitize-address-zero-base-shadow command line flag from clang, and disable zero-base shadow support on all platforms where it is not the default behavior. - It is completely unused, as far as we know. And completely undocumented, too. - It is ABI-incompatible with non-zero-base shadow, which means all objects in a process must be built with the same setting. Failing to

On 2017-01-20 14:31, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On 01/20/2017 06:11 AM, Jonas Paulsson via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I wonder why getScalarizationOverhead() does not take into account >> the number of operands of the instruction? This should influence the >> number of extracts needed, so instead of >> >> Scalarization cost = NumEls * (insert +

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Joshua Warner <joshuawarner32 at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi Talin, >> >> Sorry to interject - >> >> >>> For example, suppose I have a type "String or (float, float, float)" - >>> that is, a union of a string and a

dear R experts---I am using the coef() function to pick off the coefficients from an lm() object. alas, I also need the standard errors and I need them fast. I know I can do a "summary()" on the object and pick them off this way, but this computes other stuff I do not need. Or, I can compute (X' X)^(-1) s^2 myself. Has someone written a fast se() function? incidentally, I think

Hi, I''m trying out RSpec with the heckle option (for mutation testing). Problem is that heckle goes into an infinite loop when running it on an example. I want to send a "--verbose" to heckle but can''t find a way to do that through the spec binary. Since this is not an uncommon situation when using heckle I would like this to be supported in some way by RSpec.

Dear R-list, It is not uncommon for laboratory equipment (e.g. spectrophotometers) to have a linear response in a certain interval and then go into saturation. I wonder if there is an R-function that models this; for instance by estimating the breakpoint and fitting a line below the breakpoint and a constant above. Best regards Thomas Poulsen -- Thomas Poulsen Research Scientist. PhD,

I am facing a problem in merging two datasets. I have given codes to the names which are common in both the datasets and also to those which are uncommon. When I gave gave the following command merge(df1,df2) only those rows and columns were merged which were having common codes. When I viewed the results, only common codes are seen and the remaining entries are not seen. Can anyone guide me

Dear all, I have a barplot upon which I hope to superimpose horizontal lines extending across the width of each bar. I am able to partly achieve this through the following set of commands: positions <- barplot(bar_values, col="grey") par(new=TRUE) plot(positions, horiz_values, col="red", pch="_", ylim=c(min(bar_values), max(bar_values))) ...however this results

Am Mi., 10. Juni 2020 um 10:04 Uhr schrieb Doerfert, Johannes via flang-dev <flang-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I'm not against a subproject *but* if we also move the existing > llvm/lib/Frontend stuff, that would introduce a dependence from > llvm-core to this project, which I think is uncommon. We could also have > both. At the end of the day it depends on the benefit we would

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:49 PM Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > On May 16, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > - Core motivation: why do we even care about optimizing floating > point induction variables? What situations are they common in? Do > programmers _expect_ compilers to optimize them

Dear R-users, I use glm() to do logistic regression and use stepAIC() to do stepwise model selection. The common AIC value comes out is about 100, a good fit is as low as around 70. But for some model, the AIC went to extreme values like 1000. When I check the P-values, All the independent variables (about 30 of them) included in the equation are very significant, which is impossible, because we