search for: uncommon

Hi i have the data in the following format: rent,100,1,common,674 pipe,200,0,usual,864 car,300,1,uncommon,392:jump,700,0,common,664 car,200,1,uncommon,864:snap,900,1,usual,746 stint,600,1,uncommon,257 pull,800,0,usual,594 where as i want the above 6 lines data into 8 lines as below (Spliting row 3 & 4 at : and sending to a new row): rent,100,1,common,674 pipe,200,0,usual,864 car,300,1,uncommon,39...

Hello! I got an interesting task to make with asterisk: pstn--- * ---sip--- * pstn This sounds common till now. What I have to make is: 1.the call is routed through PSTN to asterisk1 (#1) which has ISDN PRI interface(s) - leg1 2.#1 doesn't pick up the call, neither rejects, it just place into state CALL PROGRESS (?) [maybe gives back alerting tone? probably not] 3.#1 notifies that there is

I'm setting up a test server with a Digium TE122 and am getting the following error on the console, spewing as fast as it can. Does anyone have any idea what this error might be? [Oct 19 11:24:53] NOTICE[2076]: chan_dahdi.c:3108 my_handle_dchan_exception: PRI got event: Event 59 (59) on D-channel of span 2

...hat's bigger than { > i1; String* }. LLVM won't even know there's a pointer in there, except > during those brief times when I'm accessing the pointer field. So tagging > the pointer in a different address space won't help at all here. > > I think this is a fairly uncommon use case that will be tricky to deal with no matter what method is used to track GC roots. That said, why not do something like make the pointer representation (the {i1, String*}) the long-term storage format, and only bitcast *just* before loading the floats? You could even use another address s...

Hello, Quick question: Can Samba host Work Folders? I've just started looking at the issue and the "feature" does require a server role, which I suppose is some new protocol that may not be implemented in Samba. Thanks Philippe The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon. <Anonymous>

...;> { i1; String* }. LLVM won't even know there's a pointer in there, except >> during those brief times when I'm accessing the pointer field. So tagging >> the pointer in a different address space won't help at all here. >> >> > I think this is a fairly uncommon use case that will be tricky to deal with > no matter what method is used to track GC roots. That said, why not do > something like make the pointer representation (the {i1, String*}) the > long-term storage format, and only bitcast *just* before loading the > floats? You could even u...

...as usual without losing the error in the process. To display the error, I use an overridden error_messages_for, so that the header will say "from being deleted" instead of "from being saved". This all seems a remarkably round about way of doing things for what must be a not uncommon problem. Is there a more "Rails-like" way of doing this? Has anyone else come across the problem where an error message should be raised if the user attempts to delete something important without doing X, Y and Z first? Thanks in advance, - James Reeves -- Posted via http://www.rub...

5-foot pencils? Gallon-sized coffee mugs? 10-pound chocolate bars? Yes! Yes! Yes! And yes to dozens of other common objects in uncommonly BIG sizes! That's what GreatBigStuff.com is all about! Thank you for your interest in http://www.GreatBigStuff.com. This message is to verify that you wish to have your email address: rsync@lists.samba.org added to the GreatBigStuff.com mailing list. When you confirm, you will receiv...

Hi I am searching for a way to do something like "ABC" -> c("A","B","C"). How can this be accomplished? I tried cut() and split(), but they do something else, it seems. The purpose for doing this is to find the number of common (and uncommon) characters, i.e. ultimately I want something like this: > foo("ABD","ADE") c(2,1) # 2 in x are in y, 1 in y is not in x > foo("AB","ADE") c(1,2) # 1 in x is in y, 2 in y are not in x Maybe I even do not need the string splitting? I hope I was clear...

...w. And completely undocumented, too. - It is ABI-incompatible with non-zero-base shadow, which means all objects in a process must be built with the same setting. Failing to do so results in a segmentation fault at runtime. - It introduces a backward dependency of compiler-rt on user code, which is uncommon and complicates testing. For the reference, attaching patches to cfe, llvm and compiler-rt that remove the flag and all support for it in the ASan instrumentation pass and runtime library. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: cfe.patch Type: text/x-pa...

...st = NumEls * (insert + extract) >> >> it would be better to do >> >> Scalarization cost = NumEls * (insert + (extract * numOperands)) > > I suspect this is an oversight (although we need to be a bit careful > here because if two operands are the same, which is not uncommon, we > don't want to double the cost). > > -Hal Do you in those cases of an identical operand want to count just a cost of "1" for a register move, instead of the "extraction cost"? /Jonas

...}. LLVM won't even know there's a pointer in there, except >>> during those brief times when I'm accessing the pointer field. So tagging >>> the pointer in a different address space won't help at all here. >>> >>> >> I think this is a fairly uncommon use case that will be tricky to deal >> with no matter what method is used to track GC roots. That said, why not do >> something like make the pointer representation (the {i1, String*}) the >> long-term storage format, and only bitcast *just* before loading the >> floats?...

...can do a "summary()" on the object and pick them off this way, but this computes other stuff I do not need. Or, I can compute (X' X)^(-1) s^2 myself. Has someone written a fast se() function? incidentally, I think this would make a nice addition to the R base. I presume it is not uncommon for a statistician also to want to use the se of coef estimates. pointers appreciated. regards, /iaw ---- Ivo Welch (ivo.welch@brown.edu, ivo.welch@gmail.com) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I''m trying out RSpec with the heckle option (for mutation testing). Problem is that heckle goes into an infinite loop when running it on an example. I want to send a "--verbose" to heckle but can''t find a way to do that through the spec binary. Since this is not an uncommon situation when using heckle I would like this to be supported in some way by RSpec. Thoughts? Best regards, /Robert Feldt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20070712/d92af696/attachment.html

Dear R-list, It is not uncommon for laboratory equipment (e.g. spectrophotometers) to have a linear response in a certain interval and then go into saturation. I wonder if there is an R-function that models this; for instance by estimating the breakpoint and fitting a line below the breakpoint and a constant above. Best regards...

I am facing a problem in merging two datasets. I have given codes to the names which are common in both the datasets and also to those which are uncommon. When I gave gave the following command merge(df1,df2) only those rows and columns were merged which were having common codes. When I viewed the results, only common codes are seen and the remaining entries are not seen. Can anyone guide me in this regards? How should I merge these two datasets...

...es, which don't extend across the width of each bar. I've tried using 'cex' to increase the width, but of course this also increases the height of the line and results in it spanning a large range of y-axis values. I'm sure this shouldn't be too tricky to achieve, nor that uncommon a problem! It may be that I'm taking the wrong approach. Any help offered would be gratefully received. Many thanks, Steve

...i., 10. Juni 2020 um 10:04 Uhr schrieb Doerfert, Johannes via flang-dev <flang-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I'm not against a subproject *but* if we also move the existing > llvm/lib/Frontend stuff, that would introduce a dependence from > llvm-core to this project, which I think is uncommon. We could also have > both. At the end of the day it depends on the benefit we would get from > an independent subproject. If we have non-conditional dependencies llvm-core->frontend-support and frontend-support->llvm-core, what advantage is there left of making frontend-support a subp...

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:49 PM Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > > On May 16, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > - Core motivation: why do we even care about optimizing floating > point induction variables? What situations are they common in? Do > programmers _expect_ compilers to optimize them

...d fit is as low as around 70. But for some model, the AIC went to extreme values like 1000. When I check the P-values, All the independent variables (about 30 of them) included in the equation are very significant, which is impossible, because we expect some would be dropped. This situation is not uncommon. A summary output like this: Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) 4.883e+14 1.671e+07 29217415 <2e-16 *** g761 -5.383e+14 9.897e+07 -5438529 <2e-16 *** g2809...