search for: uncharit

...jump through. > > He's not saying they're your bugs, he's just saying they need > to be reported in the correct place. > > > Go ahead, report them there! > > > I'm afraid I don't have the time to do that. I have my own work to attend > to. > How uncharitable of you. Mr Kanthak's time is more valuable than anyone else's. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20181204/b283305a/attachment.html>

"Tim Northover" <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 17:37, Stefan Kanthak via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Compile the following functions with "-O3 -target amd64" > > You've been advised before, but you really need to start reporting > these as bugs[*] if you actually care about

I don’t know what you meant to imply by “residual clause” — if you meant “it’s not particularly important”, then I suggest it is left out entirely. Apparently at least a few of us have interpreted it to say “the committee reserves the right to kick you out for any behaviour that violates our standards which you exhibit anywhere, even if it is completely unrelated to the llvm community”.

That's just a residual clause. It's not sanely possible to enumerate all the possibilities here (IE if you stalk and murder someone in the llvm community, you are going to get kicked out of the community, regardless of if you did it in a controlled space) I mean, i'm subject to legal ethics rules that are very similar, and those could get me kicked out of an entire profession :) I

Friends, Sorry to write this to a developer mailing list. I have already approached some OpenSSH/OpenBSD core members on this, including Markus Friedl, Theo de Raadt, and Niels Provos, but they have chosen not to bring the issue up on the mailing list. I am not aware of any other forum where I would reach the OpenSSH developers, so I will post this here. As you know, I have been using the SSH