Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "unaskedly".
Did you mean:
unasked
2007 Dec 09
1
Error in xorg-x11-xinit
Hello,
if login as user I get the following error message in
~/.xsession-errors*:
/etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: line 15: unask: command not found
Changing 'unask' to 'umask' seems to fix it. This happens under CentOS
5 and 5.1.
regards
Olaf
2001 Oct 26
3
warnings --- wish/bug (PR#1148)
When R prints warnings, they often go "out of the line", it would be
better if they where wrapped with
writeLines(strwrap ...
I tried to do that , changing the function warnings, but it has only
effect when called explicitely, not when R prints the warnings unasked.
Anyhow, here is the changed warnings:
warnings <-
function (...)
{
if (!(n <- length(last.warning)))
2007 Oct 27
1
typo in /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession
line 15:
if ( unask 077 && cp /dev/null "$errfile" 2> /dev/null ); then
Should be umask.
--
lfr
0/0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071027/b5be5773/attachment-0004.sig>
2020 Jul 15
2
Apache umask
On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links.? I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work. And I've tried many combinations.? Still
2000 Dec 15
2
R1.2.0 (PR#766)
Here are a few comments on the new release (1.2.0), most about R CMD
check. I have managed to install and check my libraries only making one
change to a C function (see point 1) and one to an R function because
of the way formulae now look for their data. That is the good news. Of
course, more extensive checks are liable to find further problems.
1. I need to be able to define F77_SYMBOL. This
2016 Dec 12
4
Is that possible develop a python version of tinc?
Hi all,
As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will
be interesting:)
Tks.
Cong
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>
2020 Jul 15
0
Apache umask
Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS:
> On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS
>> <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ??? Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the
>> links.? I had seen the suggested systemd
2020 Jun 11
0
handling spam from gmail.
You do not understand how mail works. Google mail is only getting
through when spf checks and the likes are being passed.
I am not creating any problems with this, I am just bouncing them back.
Google has enough billions to handle these issues. If everyone would
apply this procedures, people with legitimate email accounts would move
from a spam network to some other provider. People joining
2016 Dec 13
0
Is that possible develop a python version of tinc?
On 12/12/2016 9:46 AM, Cong Monkey wrote
> As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that
> will be interesting:)
I'll go out on a limb and say... yes. The unasked question I sense is,
"is anyone willing to port tinc to python".
I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I'm happy that tinc is
written in C. It means I can use it in
1997 Dec 18
0
SAMBA digest 1526
Ken Hamer (B83 131) <K.Hamer@axion.bt.co.uk> wrote
> BUT...... After printing a document, Samba appears to hang up the connection,
> although another seems to start pretty quickly.
...
> server.netbios- client.1065 8557 0 8760 0 CLOSE_WAIT
>
> The connection will stay in this state until the user tries to access
> something on the network drive
2001 Dec 19
2
New Winamp release
Hi,
<p>today, Winamp unaskedly notified me of a new release, v2.78. I checked
the what's-new-page on winamp.com (it does only mention a few fixes and
cddb2 support, not that I needed that) and downloaded the full install,
hoping that Ogg Vorbis support is finally included. D'oh, since I
installed it into the 2.77 install...
2020 Jul 15
2
Apache umask
On 7/13/20 4:21 PM, Phoenix, Merka wrote:
>>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.>>
>>> Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for
2006 May 04
3
Jails and loopback interfaces
> I recently did something like this. I have a webserver in a jail that
> needs to talk to a database, and the webserver is the only thing that
> should talk to the databse.
> My solution was to use 2 jails: one for the webserver, and another for the
> database.
> Jail 1:
> * runs webserver
> * binds to real interface with real, routable IP
> Jail 2:
> *
2012 Apr 17
4
parallel processing with multiple directories
Hello,
I would like to run some code in parallel with each cluster reading/writing to a different working directory. I've tried the following code without success. The error I get is: "Error in setwd(x) : cannot change working directory"
library(parallel)
dirs <- list("out1","out2","out3") # these directories are located within the current
2009 Mar 12
7
Is Mongrel dead?
Is Mongrel dead? When I look at http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/wiki/News
the latest news was from close to a year ago, when last version of
Mongrel was released. A look at the tickets shows a rather sad picture
with only two developers “evanweaver” and “luislavena” contributing to
the bug fixes lately.
Please understand that I am not complaining – I just want to know the
situation so that I can
2005 Apr 17
29
Re: dumb, dumb question ...
>Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:28:05 -0400
>From: "ryanag@zoominternet.net" <ryanag@zoominternet.net>
>Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] dumb, dumb question **follow-up on
> support-request documentation**
>To: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net>
>Cc: Mailing List for Shorewall Users
> <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net>
>Message-ID:
2006 Jul 14
39
Time to split the list?
I hope no one gets offended by my asking, but I wonder what others think about the possibility of splitting the list into two or three focal areas. Personally, I think I''d like to see three seperate lists: 1) newbie development (e.g., help working through tutorials, etc.) 2) more advanced development topics, 3) environment setup / admin.. What do you think?
Best regards,
Bill