search for: unaskedly

Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "unaskedly".

Did you mean: unasked
2007 Dec 09
1
Error in xorg-x11-xinit
Hello, if login as user I get the following error message in ~/.xsession-errors*: /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: line 15: unask: command not found Changing 'unask' to 'umask' seems to fix it. This happens under CentOS 5 and 5.1. regards Olaf
2001 Oct 26
3
warnings --- wish/bug (PR#1148)
When R prints warnings, they often go "out of the line", it would be better if they where wrapped with writeLines(strwrap ... I tried to do that , changing the function warnings, but it has only effect when called explicitely, not when R prints the warnings unasked. Anyhow, here is the changed warnings: warnings <- function (...) { if (!(n <- length(last.warning)))
2007 Oct 27
1
typo in /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession
line 15: if ( unask 077 && cp /dev/null "$errfile" 2> /dev/null ); then Should be umask. -- lfr 0/0 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071027/b5be5773/attachment-0004.sig>
2020 Jul 15
2
Apache umask
On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote: > > > Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links.? I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work. And I've tried many combinations.? Still
2000 Dec 15
2
R1.2.0 (PR#766)
Here are a few comments on the new release (1.2.0), most about R CMD check. I have managed to install and check my libraries only making one change to a C function (see point 1) and one to an R function because of the way formulae now look for their data. That is the good news. Of course, more extensive checks are liable to find further problems. 1. I need to be able to define F77_SYMBOL. This
2016 Dec 12
4
Is that possible develop a python version of tinc?
Hi all, As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will be interesting:) Tks. Cong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>
2020 Jul 15
0
Apache umask
Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS: > On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS >> <centos at centos.org <mailto:centos at centos.org>> wrote: >> >> >> ??? Thanks for the info.? I hadn't seen that before nor many of the >> links.? I had seen the suggested systemd
2020 Jun 11
0
handling spam from gmail.
You do not understand how mail works. Google mail is only getting through when spf checks and the likes are being passed. I am not creating any problems with this, I am just bouncing them back. Google has enough billions to handle these issues. If everyone would apply this procedures, people with legitimate email accounts would move from a spam network to some other provider. People joining
2016 Dec 13
0
Is that possible develop a python version of tinc?
On 12/12/2016 9:46 AM, Cong Monkey wrote > As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that > will be interesting:) I'll go out on a limb and say... yes. The unasked question I sense is, "is anyone willing to port tinc to python". I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I'm happy that tinc is written in C. It means I can use it in
1997 Dec 18
0
SAMBA digest 1526
Ken Hamer (B83 131) <K.Hamer@axion.bt.co.uk> wrote > BUT...... After printing a document, Samba appears to hang up the connection, > although another seems to start pretty quickly. ... > server.netbios- client.1065 8557 0 8760 0 CLOSE_WAIT > > The connection will stay in this state until the user tries to access > something on the network drive
2001 Dec 19
2
New Winamp release
Hi, <p>today, Winamp unaskedly notified me of a new release, v2.78. I checked the what's-new-page on winamp.com (it does only mention a few fixes and cddb2 support, not that I needed that) and downloaded the full install, hoping that Ogg Vorbis support is finally included. D'oh, since I installed it into the 2.77 install...
2020 Jul 15
2
Apache umask
On 7/13/20 4:21 PM, Phoenix, Merka wrote: >>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.>> >>> Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for
2006 May 04
3
Jails and loopback interfaces
> I recently did something like this. I have a webserver in a jail that > needs to talk to a database, and the webserver is the only thing that > should talk to the databse. > My solution was to use 2 jails: one for the webserver, and another for the > database. > Jail 1: > * runs webserver > * binds to real interface with real, routable IP > Jail 2: > *
2012 Apr 17
4
parallel processing with multiple directories
Hello, I would like to run some code in parallel with each cluster reading/writing to a different working directory. I've tried the following code without success. The error I get is: "Error in setwd(x) : cannot change working directory" library(parallel) dirs <- list("out1","out2","out3") # these directories are located within the current
2009 Mar 12
7
Is Mongrel dead?
Is Mongrel dead? When I look at http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/wiki/News the latest news was from close to a year ago, when last version of Mongrel was released. A look at the tickets shows a rather sad picture with only two developers “evanweaver” and “luislavena” contributing to the bug fixes lately. Please understand that I am not complaining – I just want to know the situation so that I can
2005 Apr 17
29
Re: dumb, dumb question ...
>Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:28:05 -0400 >From: "ryanag@zoominternet.net" <ryanag@zoominternet.net> >Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] dumb, dumb question **follow-up on > support-request documentation** >To: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> >Cc: Mailing List for Shorewall Users > <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> >Message-ID:
2006 Jul 14
39
Time to split the list?
I hope no one gets offended by my asking, but I wonder what others think about the possibility of splitting the list into two or three focal areas. Personally, I think I''d like to see three seperate lists: 1) newbie development (e.g., help working through tutorials, etc.) 2) more advanced development topics, 3) environment setup / admin.. What do you think? Best regards, Bill