search for: unask

Hello, if login as user I get the following error message in ~/.xsession-errors*: /etc/X11/xinit/Xsession: line 15: unask: command not found Changing 'unask' to 'umask' seems to fix it. This happens under CentOS 5 and 5.1. regards Olaf

When R prints warnings, they often go "out of the line", it would be better if they where wrapped with writeLines(strwrap ... I tried to do that , changing the function warnings, but it has only effect when called explicitely, not when R prints the warnings unasked. Anyhow, here is the changed warnings: warnings <- function (...) { if (!(n <- length(last.warning))) return() names <- names(last.warning) cat("Warning message", if (n > 1) "s", ":\n", sep = "") for (i in 1:...

line 15: if ( unask 077 && cp /dev/null "$errfile" 2> /dev/null ); then Should be umask. -- lfr 0/0 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos....

...d change the permissions every time they update the site. Or even to update most plugins. Wprdpress sites are better, but even then, I still sometimes need to set and unset explicit file permissions depending on the plugins installed. All this would not be an issue if apache created files with a unask of 002. One simple adjustment to the server to allow us to use normal Linux file permissions to manage files. If I don't find a solution to this I guess I'll have to use your ACL suggestion. It is getting to be pain to manage multiple sites in the current manner. Surely someone knows how...

...us mortals. Those few lines need to be moved into one of the accessible header files. 3. Makefiles in pkg/src are no longer read properly. This creates a big problem for me in library development. 3. DESCRIPTION has to have licence mis-spelled as license for the check to work. 4. check produces unasked for tex output (that I would like to be able to shut off) then an error that linktocpage is undefined. 5. check always produces an error message at the end: Attempt to free unreferenced scalar during global destruction. I am not sure if this is a reference to Chernobyl but I do not understand it...

Hi all, As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that will be interesting:) Tks. Cong -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc-devel/attachments/20161213/fcd83914/attachment.html>

...) ) ); define( 'FS_CHMOD_FILE', ( 0664 & ~ umask() ) ); > Wprdpress sites are better, but even then, I still sometimes need to set > and unset explicit file permissions depending on the plugins installed. > > All this would not be an issue if apache created files with a unask of > 002.? One simple adjustment to the server to allow us to use normal > Linux file permissions to manage files. > > If I don't find a solution to this I guess I'll have to use your ACL > suggestion. It is getting to be pain to manage multiple sites in the > current...

...th the above > https://www.domainwithoutletsencryptcertificate.com/asdfasdfadsfaf > > 5. sender clicks confirm url > 6. email address is added to some white list. > 7. email is delivered to recipient. and i am sick of people not understanding how email works! you don't send unasked mail to a in the most cases forged sender unless you want to be part of the problem backscatters and brainless autoreplies have to be burnt with fire

On 12/12/2016 9:46 AM, Cong Monkey wrote > As title, is that possible to develop a python version of tinc, that > will be interesting:) I'll go out on a limb and say... yes. The unasked question I sense is, "is anyone willing to port tinc to python". I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I'm happy that tinc is written in C. It means I can use it in barebones environments such as embedded devices where running python is out of the question for reaso...

...ised that the session has been closed... > > Normally, when the user tries to access anything on the network drive, the > smbd daemon, as expected, kicks off a new process, a new connection is > established and everybody is happy. And that sounds like the client recovering from an unasked for disconnection... > HOWEVER, some clients drop the network drive and their users find that they > must re-connect. Sometime this is not possible until the old connection times > out. Both NT and Windows95 clients are affected. I SUSPECT that this is more > of a client problem...

Hi, <p>today, Winamp unaskedly notified me of a new release, v2.78. I checked the what's-new-page on winamp.com (it does only mention a few fixes and cddb2 support, not that I needed that) and downloaded the full install, hoping that Ogg Vorbis support is finally included. D'oh, since I installed it into the 2.77 ins...

On 7/13/20 4:21 PM, Phoenix, Merka wrote: >>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.>> >>> Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for

> I recently did something like this. I have a webserver in a jail that > needs to talk to a database, and the webserver is the only thing that > should talk to the databse. > My solution was to use 2 jails: one for the webserver, and another for the > database. > Jail 1: > * runs webserver > * binds to real interface with real, routable IP > Jail 2: > *

Hello, I would like to run some code in parallel with each cluster reading/writing to a different working directory. I've tried the following code without success. The error I get is: "Error in setwd(x) : cannot change working directory" library(parallel) dirs <- list("out1","out2","out3") # these directories are located within the current

Is Mongrel dead? When I look at http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/wiki/News the latest news was from close to a year ago, when last version of Mongrel was released. A look at the tickets shows a rather sad picture with only two developers “evanweaver” and “luislavena” contributing to the bug fixes lately. Please understand that I am not complaining – I just want to know the situation so that I can

>Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:28:05 -0400 >From: "ryanag@zoominternet.net" <ryanag@zoominternet.net> >Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] dumb, dumb question **follow-up on > support-request documentation** >To: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> >Cc: Mailing List for Shorewall Users > <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> >Message-ID:

I hope no one gets offended by my asking, but I wonder what others think about the possibility of splitting the list into two or three focal areas. Personally, I think I''d like to see three seperate lists: 1) newbie development (e.g., help working through tutorials, etc.) 2) more advanced development topics, 3) environment setup / admin.. What do you think? Best regards, Bill