search for: unaccount

..... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in R code ... OK * checking S3 generic/method consistency ... OK * checking replacement functions ... OK * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... OK * checking Rd files ... ERROR Rd files with likely Rd problems: Unaccounted top-level text in file 'NFIRS-class.Rd': Following section 'note': "\n\n ~Make other sections like Warning with \\section{Warning }{....} ~\n\n" Unaccounted top-level text in file 'NFIRS-package.Rd': Following section 'references': "\n~~ Optionally...

What is so slow here? The render takes up 8% and the queries take up 1%. That leaves 91% unaccounted for. Completed in 0.06477 (15 reqs/sec) | Rendering: 0.00574 (8%) | DB: 0.00087 (1%) | 200 OK [http://localhost/] Any help would be appreciated. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: T...

...85 ( 6.4%) SROA ... real 1m7.783s user 1m7.548s sys 0m0.183s So: opt reports that it took 19 seconds, but overall, the run took 88 seconds. The system in question is a 6-core AMD K10 with 8GB of memory. The system is not running anything else at the time. What activity accounts for the unaccounted-for time? For my application, IR verification has pathological performance (I ought to file a bug on that), therefore I disable it. It is not clear if the IR verifier is running in my opt runs. There is no line item for it. It is also not clear if opt does instruction selection. I tried specify...

We finally flipped the switch on one of our ZFS-based servers, with approximately 1TB of 2.8TB (3 stripes of 950MB or so, each of which is a RAID5 volume on the adaptec card). We have snapshots every 4 hours for the first few days. If you add up the snapshot references it appears somewhat high versus daily use (mostly mail boxes, spam, etc changing), but say an aggregate of no more than 400+MB a

...on two machines, one i386 (3.0GHz P4) and one x86_64 (2.6GHz Opteron). Both have centos-release-4-3.2 autoconf-2.59-5 However, on the i386: perl-5.8.5-34.RHEL4 Whereas on the x86_64: perl-5.8.5-24.RHEL4 Is this really correct? I ask because when I attempt to recompile zsh on the x86_64 box, I unaccountably get this error: Can't locate object method "path" via package "Request" at /usr/share/autoconf/Autom4te/C4che.pm line 69, <GEN1> line 111. I'm trying to recompile zsh in the first place because the "limit" command doesn't work on the x86_64 syst...

...his. %51 - Passes. Mostly the layout pass. And in the layout pass it's mostly due to cache misses. I've already tried parallelizing the sort, it doesn't help much. %9 - Writer. Most of this is in prep work. The actual writing to disk part and applying relocations is very small. %1 - Unaccounted for. I'm going to do some work to solve the get_magic and resolver issue with threads. I think we really need to look into how the layout pass is handled. If the cache effects are bad enough, we may actually need to change to a non-virtual POD based interface for atoms. Meaning that readers...

And can we make p2m memory allocation from domain heap directly? -Xin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi, sorry for this lengthy post. I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled. Overview: A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*? C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary? F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble When running >R CMD check CWHst...

Hi, sorry for this lengthy post. I am using R-2.0.0 on Unix, compiled. Overview: A) R CMD check: Unaccounted top-level text B) In which sections of *.Rd is LaTeX notation allowed, where *not*? C) Codoc mismatches and polyvalent parameters D) Successful R CMD INSTALL and R CMD build E) cp ../Rd.sty . is copy necessary? F) latex ./CWHstat-manual.tex runs into trouble When running >R CMD check CWHst...

On 04/10/2016 10:27 AM, Adrian Minta wrote: > It will be nice if the "SELECT MyMailbox" command will be "SELECT > mymailbox LIMIT 100" or something, to get the first files since only the > last messages are shown to the user. SELECTing a mailbox has nothing to do with FETCHing messages, so above does not make much sense. I don't know dovecot's code, but I

...call. = FALSE, domain = NA) 1: library(package, lib.loc = lib.loc, character.only = TRUE, verbose = FALSE) Execution halted See section 'System and foreign language interfaces' of the 'Writing R Extensions' manual. * checking Rd files ... WARNING Rd files with likely Rd problems: Unaccounted top-level text in file '/Users/sdavis/Work/R-Programs/packages/devel /ExpressCGH/ExpressCGH1/man/convertDNAcopyOutput.Rd': Following section 'note': "\n\n ~Make other sections like Warning with \\section{Warning }{....} ~\n\n" Rd files with non-standard keywords: /Us...

...t, but had it been important what would I need to do? -- Nine-tenths of the universe is the knowledge of the position and direction of everything in the other tenth. Every atom has its biography, every star its file, every chemical exchange its equivalent of the inspector with a clipboard. It is unaccounted for because it is doing the accounting for the rest of it. Nine-tenths of the universe, in fact, is the paperwork. --The Thief of Time

Hi guys, There seems to have been some discussion about this before (http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-September/013050.html) but I don''t *quite* understand why the roundup is necessary. Using Bill''s notation, if there isn''t a roundup (writing 4k fs blocks to a 4 device RAID-Z) wouldn''t you get something like this: Disk 0 1 2

hi, I'm using the sem package, and I want to make sure I'm interpreting the output correctly. Here is an excerpt of my output. When I report the MWD error, should I say that 59% of the variation in MWD is not explained by the model, or that 59% of the variation is explained, or something entirely different. Parameter Estimates Estimate Std Error z value Pr(>|z|)

...from the "System Events" email: # cat inetutils-syslogd ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ syslogd \(GNU inetutils [1-9]\.[0-9]+\): restart$ This bug report is for logcheck 1.2.69 but I have looked at the logcheck package files in wheezy (1.3.14) and it appears inetutils-syslogd remains unaccounted for (although note that inetutils-syslogd is now at 2:1.8-5). Thanks.

...multiprocessor systems it is often presenting misleading metrics, missing some of the data. In cases where a CPU other than the first is performing most of the operations, it can be especially bad. In the example below there are many instances where the higher values from the second processor are unaccounted for. cat /proc/net/stat/nf_conntrack; sudo -u nobody conntrack -S entries searched found new invalid ignore delete delete_list insert insert_failed drop early_drop icmp_error expect_new expect_create expect_delete search_restart 0000014b 004cfa4f 04e9e53e 0049ce54 0000f543 006fd72d 005cfde7...

> > Thanks for reporting this. Though I bluntly admit I just ignore > everything coming from Microsoft. Hotmail has been tagging my company's > mailserver as a spammer for ages, so I'm tagging everything coming from > Microsoft as crapware. Nothing good has ever been produced by this > company. The last time I actually used MS Windows for work was around > 2001, before

...ve_sieve file. But it makes no mention of Junk. -- Nine-tenths of the universe is the knowledge of the position and direction of everything in the other tenth. Every atom has its biography, every star its file, every chemical exchange its equivalent of the inspector with a clipboard. It is unaccounted for because it is doing the accounting for the rest of it. Nine-tenths of the universe, in fact, is the paperwork. --The Thief of Time -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200219/d9458361/attachm...

...LVM release notes. - compiler_rt, libc++, LLDB: What happened in your project over the last 6 months? We need at least a few bullet points! I'd also like some blurb about the AddressSanitizer project, it's a major new feature and we only have a link to the documentation. Have a currently unaccounted breaking API change in LLVM in mind? An awesome major change that we forgot? Put it in the release notes! Our projected release date is May 14th aka TOMORROW and we need to have the relnotes finished by then. The process is easy, just commit to docs/ReleaseNotes.html in trunk and it will get pul...

...Meg and a delta file of 2.3Meg and used a bwlimit=1 and tested the "real" time against an expected "real" time and got a comparable result. My expected completion time was 96 seconds based upon 5.8 Meg total traffic and the measured time was 114 seconds. There is only 20 seconds unaccounted for, so the bw throttling may not be 100% on the money but I dont think it is off that much. My intuition is that a large part of the 20 seconds is idle time in the communications pipe caused by processing and scheduling delays, etc. Wayne's patch is better than the previous implementation....