Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "ulimt".
Did you mean:
ulimit
2014 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] setrlimit vs ulimt
Hi Evgeniy,
This fix causes me trouble in the emulator because of the execv(argv[0]):
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140217/205359.html
Instead using setrlimit from within the C++ code, can you set the
stack limit using ulimit on the RUN lines? Also, should this test be
moved to the Posix or Linux directory?
Thanks,
Greg
2014 May 29
2
[LLVMdev] setrlimit vs ulimt
> execv(argv[0]) is a canonical way to restart the
> process, it's sad that the emulator interferes with that.
We have the option to emulate the instruction set or emulate the OS.
The former is lighter weight and easy to configure. The downside is
that system calls route to the host system. That can be useful if,
for example, the executable invokes llvm-symbolizer.
While
2014 May 29
2
[LLVMdev] setrlimit vs ulimt
> Why does fork-exec for llvm-symbolizer work, but simple exec(self) does not?
Because the llvm-symbolizer the runtime finds is built for the host
architecture. This is weird, yes, but once we integrate the
symbolizer, it goes away.
> Could we write a ulimit-like utility that would do setrlimit and then
> exec the specified binary
> %run %ulimit -s 8192 %t?
I like that idea. How
2010 Oct 23
0
Re: Available Memory Mapping Space (PC Study Bible 5)
2 years later, and I thought to try this out again (been using e-sword happily). This time due to more error messages added (I think) to verison 1.3.5 I figured out I had to add a higher ulimt.
Added "ngoonee hard nofile 32000" to /etc/security/limits.conf and restarted
Installation didn't work on wow64, needed WINEARCH=win32 when actually creating ~/.wine before it would work (Installshield issue).
Otherwise it seems to run just fine =). Kudos, wine has come very very v...
2011 Jun 27
2
Mail Question
Hello everyone,
Im having a issue that I just cant seem to figure out. We currently are
running an email server Centos 5.6 Postfix/Dovecot with a squirrelmail
frontend. I was setting up a testbed to do a migration to SoGo using
LDAP/MYSQL/POSTFIX/Dovecot. I have everything up and functional but one
thing is giving me an issue. The testbed box will not handle a users
mailbox over 2gb. We are using
2015 Apr 30
2
Mysql 5.6, Centos 7 and errno: 24 - Too many open files
Thank you for clarifying this, Johan. Very much appreciated!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 22:28:00 +0200
Johan Kooijman wrote:
> Carl,
>
> By default my.cnf has to obey the OS limits, so in this case the
> order is: systemd > /etc/security/limits* > /etc/my*.
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Carl E. Hartung
> <carlh04426 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi