search for: ulimits

.../icecast2 ulimit -n 20000 And I can stream over 1k users now. There is no config about ulimit for icecast2, and therefore, I suggest that we add something like this in /etc/init.d/icecast2 # Check if the ULIMIT is set in /etc/default/icecast2 if [ -n "$ULIMIT" ]; then # Set the ulimits ulimit $ULIMIT fi And add a /etc/default/icecast2 with the following sample config # Example: ULIMIT="-n 4096" #ULIMIT="-n 4096" I steal these from Nginx config! Anyway, what I am saying is that we need a config file to deal with this issue! -------------- next part...

I just realize that i can't run a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on my DC's (4.7.6): ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ldb/modules/ldb' - Too many open files ldb: unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/ldb' - Too many open files ..... >From memory, it was just fine on samba 4.6 If I check system

Hi All, Hope you people are doing good. I have a manifest file : lass profile { # setup profile parms. We dont handle non Ubuntu OS yet if ("$operatingsystem" == "Ubuntu") { file { "/etc/profile.d": ensure => directory, purge => true, force => true, recurse =>

Running across some curious stuff with ulimit on CentOS 5.10. We have a non CentOS packaged version of Asterisk (using their packages) that we start at boot time with a typical RC script. Recently it started whining that it couldn't open enough file handles. As we dug further into this, it appears that at boot time, it inherits ulimit from init, which is pretty low: 1024. We've set

> Why does fork-exec for llvm-symbolizer work, but simple exec(self) does not? Because the llvm-symbolizer the runtime finds is built for the host architecture. This is weird, yes, but once we integrate the symbolizer, it goes away. > Could we write a ulimit-like utility that would do setrlimit and then > exec the specified binary > %run %ulimit -s 8192 %t? I like that idea. How

Hello, On a production system, I'm seeing this: [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14742] res_agi.c: Unable to create toast pipe: Too many open files [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[9283] acl.c: Cannot create socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[9283] rtp.c: Unable to allocate RTCP socket: Too many open files [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732] acl.c: Cannot create socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732]

Hi I update os from debian8 to debian9 # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 All works fine but sometimes I get: Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master:

When restarting Dovecot 2.2.10 (via atrpms) on RHEL 6, I get the error: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (1024 < 4096), because of default_client_limit # doveconf default_internal_user default_internal_user = dovecot Should dovecot print this warning based on $default_internal_user, or based on root? As root: # ulimit -n 1024 As user dovecot: $ ulimit -n

> execv(argv[0]) is a canonical way to restart the > process, it's sad that the emulator interferes with that. We have the option to emulate the instruction set or emulate the OS. The former is lighter weight and easy to configure. The downside is that system calls route to the host system. That can be useful if, for example, the executable invokes llvm-symbolizer. While

On 31 Jan 2015, at 01:42, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > Hi testers, > > 3.6.0-rc2 was just tagged. Please test and build binaries. > > The tracking bug for 3.6 blockers is http://llvm.org/pr22374. Please > file issues against it. > > Thanks for helping with the release! This time I got an error during check-all, on i386-unknown-freebsd10:

I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on Centos 5.4 64 bit. How do I do that? Been searching and have yet to find a good answer. Tried to do it in rc.local but it appears to happen to late there. Matt

Hi, perhaps this? > with new debian9: > open files (-n) 1024 Regards Urban Am 16.09.20 um 12:57 schrieb Maciej Milaszewski: > Hi > Limits: > > Where all working fine: > > core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 > data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 > file size?????????????? (blocks,

Hi! Question from the novice. I have to permanently increase number of opened files ( ulimit -n 16384 and ulimit -Hn 16384) for some application. I did custom kernel based on https://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/sysadmin-guide/s1-custom-kernel-modularized.html and application documentation ( written for RH 9), no error during all makes but I have panic during the

I am having a problem with running utorrent on wine. After running for a little while I eventually get: Error: Too many files open. I have set ulimit -n unlimited which gives me: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM :~# ulimit -n 1048576 root@???: 02:43 AM :~# Also its got plenty of file descriptors so it doesn't seem like wine is truly using up to that amount: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM

I get this when I reload dovecot after any changes. How can I fix it? I can?t find any reference to it anywhere. master: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (256 < 1000), because of default_client_limit thanks Robert

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:00:39PM +0800, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote: > Hi Andrea, The following is a thread on ext3-users in which sct mentions > that this is due to a core VFS bug introduced in 2.4.10 which applies > ulimits to block devices. Maybe this could be due to some interaction > with your blockdevice in pagecache > > I don't know if you already have a fix in your tree. Maybe sct can > provide you with more info You need to upgrade glibc to something recent like 2.2.1, so that the ulimit will...

Hi Limits: Where all working fine: core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 file size?????????????? (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals???????????????? (-i) 257970 max locked memory?????? (kbytes, -l) 64 max memory size???????? (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files????????????????????? (-n) 65536 pipe

Hi Thomas, > Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel > parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? > > I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not > survive a reboot. > > Thanks for the response, I've been nosing around that file recently but noted the first two lines; #This file sets the

Dear for having an stable system which limit option is good for ulimit comand ? 2-is any option for making asterisk crash-free? Best -- Pezhman Lali -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110810/365d9d56/attachment.htm>

Hi All, Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not survive a reboot. I've Googled plenty and can't find any solution, thanks Michael