search for: ufuk

...set the enviroment variable in that file but it seems mongrel runs that file after it calls enviroment.rb I also used apache''s mod_proxy+mod_header to set requestheader but it didn''t work either. Is there a way to set an enviroment variable before mongrel initializes? Thanks Ufuk.

Op 19-10-2016 om 13:47 schreef Matthew Broadhead: > i am not 100% sure how to give you the information you require. > > my current setup in /etc/postfix/master.cf is > flags=DRhu user=vmail:mail argv=/usr/libexec/dovecot/deliver -d > ${recipient} > so recipient would presumably be user at domain.tld? or do you want the > real email address of one of our users? is there

Hi dear all, suppose that s is a statistic code; i have a matrix (x) which has 7 columns (1=x1,2=x23=x3,4=x4,5=x5,6=x6 and7=y) and has 20 rows. i want to do linear reggression like reg<-lm(x[,7]~1+x[,1]+x[,2]+.......+x[,6]) but i want to do delete i th row for nrows times and create regression model like above and compute each models' "s" statistics and list them. but i could

...gorithm did not converge I have read some things about this issue in the mailing list. I can guess what was the problem. My data contains one or may be two outliers. Does the error occur due to these extreme values or something else such as MLE? Is there any way to to fix this problem? Regards, Ufuk ----- Best regards Ufuk -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/glm-fit-fitted-probabilities-numerically-0-or-1-occurred-tp4490722p4490722.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...6: > from=<matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk>, size=3190, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 amavis[32367]: (32367-17) Passed CLEAN > {RelayedInternal}, ORIGINATING LOCAL [80.30.255.180]:54566 > [80.30.255.180] <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> -> > <ufuk.koksal at nbmlaw.co.uk>, Queue-ID: BFFA62C1965, Message-ID: > <edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk>, mail_id: > TlJQ9xQhWjQk, Hits: -2.9, size: 2235, queued_as: 7599A2C19C6, > dkim_new=foo:nbmlaw.co.uk, 531 ms > Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtp[1135]: BFFA62...

...adhead at nbmlaw.co.uk>, size=3190, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >>> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 amavis[32367]: (32367-17) Passed CLEAN >>> {RelayedInternal}, ORIGINATING LOCAL [80.30.255.180]:54566 >>> [80.30.255.180] <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> -> >>> <ufuk.koksal at nbmlaw.co.uk>, Queue-ID: BFFA62C1965, Message-ID: >>> <edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk>, mail_id: >>> TlJQ9xQhWjQk, Hits: -2.9, size: 2235, queued_as: 7599A2C19C6, >>> dkim_new=foo:nbmlaw.co.uk, 531 ms >>> Oct 19 13:25:41 n...

...>>>>> active) >>>>> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 amavis[32367]: (32367-17) Passed CLEAN >>>>> {RelayedInternal}, ORIGINATING LOCAL [80.30.255.180]:54566 >>>>> [80.30.255.180] <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> -> >>>>> <ufuk.koksal at nbmlaw.co.uk>, Queue-ID: BFFA62C1965, Message-ID: >>>>> <edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk>, mail_id: >>>>> TlJQ9xQhWjQk, Hits: -2.9, size: 2235, queued_as: 7599A2C19C6, >>>>> dkim_new=foo:nbmlaw.co.uk, 531 ms >&g...

...ix/qmgr[1059]: 7599A2C19C6: from=<matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk>, size=3190, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 amavis[32367]: (32367-17) Passed CLEAN {RelayedInternal}, ORIGINATING LOCAL [80.30.255.180]:54566 [80.30.255.180] <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> -> <ufuk.koksal at nbmlaw.co.uk>, Queue-ID: BFFA62C1965, Message-ID: <edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk>, mail_id: TlJQ9xQhWjQk, Hits: -2.9, size: 2235, queued_as: 7599A2C19C6, dkim_new=foo:nbmlaw.co.uk, 531 ms Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtp[1135]: BFFA62C1965: to=<ufuk....

...=<matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk>, size=3190, nrcpt=1 (queue active) >> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 amavis[32367]: (32367-17) Passed CLEAN >> {RelayedInternal}, ORIGINATING LOCAL [80.30.255.180]:54566 >> [80.30.255.180] <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> -> >> <ufuk.koksal at nbmlaw.co.uk>, Queue-ID: BFFA62C1965, Message-ID: >> <edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk>, mail_id: >> TlJQ9xQhWjQk, Hits: -2.9, size: 2235, queued_as: 7599A2C19C6, >> dkim_new=foo:nbmlaw.co.uk, 531 ms >> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 postfix/smtp[...

...190, nrcpt=1 (queue >>>> active) >>>> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 amavis[32367]: (32367-17) Passed CLEAN >>>> {RelayedInternal}, ORIGINATING LOCAL [80.30.255.180]:54566 >>>> [80.30.255.180] <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> -> >>>> <ufuk.koksal at nbmlaw.co.uk>, Queue-ID: BFFA62C1965, Message-ID: >>>> <edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk>, mail_id: >>>> TlJQ9xQhWjQk, Hits: -2.9, size: 2235, queued_as: 7599A2C19C6, >>>> dkim_new=foo:nbmlaw.co.uk, 531 ms >>>> O...

...;> active) >>>>>> Oct 19 13:25:41 ns1 amavis[32367]: (32367-17) Passed CLEAN >>>>>> {RelayedInternal}, ORIGINATING LOCAL [80.30.255.180]:54566 >>>>>> [80.30.255.180] <matthew.broadhead at nbmlaw.co.uk> -> >>>>>> <ufuk.koksal at nbmlaw.co.uk>, Queue-ID: BFFA62C1965, Message-ID: >>>>>> <edc55a9b-eb49-3945-dc60-0e1d51a78e97 at nbmlaw.co.uk>, mail_id: >>>>>> TlJQ9xQhWjQk, Hits: -2.9, size: 2235, queued_as: 7599A2C19C6, >>>>>> dkim_new=foo:nbmlaw.co.uk, 5...

Hi dear all, It may be a simple question, i have a list output with different number of elements as following; [[1]] [1] 0.86801402 -0.82974691 0.39746666 -0.98566707 -4.96576856 -1.32056754 [7] -5.54093319 -0.07600462 -1.34457280 -1.04080125 1.62843297 -0.20473912 [13] 0.30659907 2.66908117 2.53791837 0.53788013 -0.57463077 0.27708874 [19] -2.94233200 1.54565643 -6.83694100

Hi Dear All, This is a function which contains Covariance Ratio and Likelihood Distance values (CVRi, LDi). i want to compute the all row's values, that is run this function for nrow(X) times. The X and Y matrices are;

Hi Dear All, Can someone give me a suggestion about which robust statistics are most appropriate for outlier detection in linear models, and is available with R ? Thanks for any idea. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Robust-Statistics-for-Outlier-Detection-tp3438493p3438493.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi dear all, i have a data (data.frame) which contain y and x coloumn(i.e. y x 1 0.58545723 0.15113102 2 0.02769361 -0.02172165 3 1.00927527 -1.80072610 4 0.56504053 -1.12236685 5 0.58332337 -1.24263981 6 -1.70257274 0.46238255 7 -0.88501561 0.89484429 8 1.14466282 0.34193875 9 0.58827457 0.15923694 10 -0.79532232 -1.44193770 ) i changed

Hi guys, I''m looking for a way to pass environment variables to my Rails app via Mongrel. I want to conditionally execute code in environment.rb based on these environment variables. Background: 1. I have some special stuff I want to do when my Rails app first starts 2. So, stuff it in environment.rb in after_initialize, right? 3. Not this time. I have several other background

Hi dear all, Can aynone help me about delete-d jackknife usually normal jackknife code for my data is: n <- nrow(data) y <- data$y z <- data$z theta.hat <- mean(y) / mean(z) print (theta.hat) theta.jack <- numeric(n) for (i in 1:n) theta.jack[i] <- mean(y[-i]) / mean(z[-i]) bias <- (n - 1) * (mean(theta.jack) - theta.hat) print(bias) but how i can apply delete-d jackknife

Hi everyones, my function like; e <- rnorm(n=50, mean=0, sd=sqrt(0.5625)) x0 <- c(rep(1,50)) x1 <- rnorm(n=50,mean=2,sd=1) x2 <- rnorm(n=50,mean=2,sd=1) x3 <- rnorm(n=50,mean=2,sd=1) x4 <- rnorm(n=50,mean=2,sd=1) y <- 1+ 2*x1+4*x2+3*x3+2*x4+e x2[1] = 10 #influential observarion y[1] = 10 #influential observarion data.x <- matrix(c(x0,x1,x2,x3,x4),ncol=5) data.y

Hi, I' am interested in differences between sample's result when samples consist of full elements and consist of only distinct elements. When sample consist of full elements it take about 120 sec., but when consist of only distinct elements it take about 4.5 or 5 times more sec. I expected that opposite of this result, because unique(sample) has less elements than full sample. Code as

...ons (Hugo Mildenberger) > 46. a remove question (Erin Hodgess) > 47. Re: a remove question (David Winsemius) > 48. Re: a remove question (Joshua Wiley) > 49. Re: a remove question (David Winsemius) > 50. Re: a remove question (Hugo Mildenberger) > 51. Computing and Finding (ufuk beyaztas) > 52. WORK AREA TO SAVE (Barbara.Rogo@uniroma1.it) > 53. Re: WORK AREA TO SAVE (Duncan Murdoch) > 54. Re: a remove question (Pete Brecknock) > 55. Re: Memory issues (Chris Howden) > 56. Re: how to calculate the consistency of different clusterings > (Michael Be...