search for: udpates

What is the difference in treatment between an ajax link_to_remote and a form_remote_tag This works great and adds a list item to an ordered list with id=form_results link_to_remote ("Help me please!", :update => ''form_results'', :url => { :action => :search_ajax_test }, :position =>

dear all, I get internet via a proxy server when I try to downlaod package it always fail. Even when i add and environnment variable for the http proxy server. I use windows XP SP2 Sincerly Justin BEM El?ve Ing?nieur Statisticien Economiste BP 294 Yaound?. T?l (00237)9597295.

We are currently using the version of Dovecot (0.99.11) that comes with Redhat Enterpise Linux version 4, running on an IBM x445 server (8 CPU, hyperthreading on, 14GB RAM) using the maildir format. We have had to patch this with a change from 0.99.12 so that it doesn't incorrectly report SASL capability upon connection but otherwise it is the version supplied with the OS (we do this to

On one notebook (so far), I have not picked up the new kernel: kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.i686.rpm I have gotten it on some notebooks. So far the only difference I can see between the systems that MIGHT matter is those that got the update were new installs and had not reached 3 installed kernels. The one that failed already had 3 kernels in /boot. But I seem to recall this was about how

Hey, recently I experienced yum bugs on some servers... A simple 'yum update' gives me the yum usage... I noticed a difference between it and a simple 'yum': ? # yum udpate ? Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities ? usage: yum [options] COMMAND ? # yum ? Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities ? You need to give some command ? usage: yum [options] COMMAND Once, a

Hi Folks, I ran into this assertion failure while compiling a function with a large number of arguments: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21609 I have coded up the fix as per David's suggestion (added a new header field for DIVariable to separate out ArgNo & LineNo). The proposed diff is attached to the bug. However, there are around 175 testcases across clang & llvm that need

After updating this morning cvs udpate -APd rm config.cache ./configure make depend && make i get this when 'make install' : what should i do ? (think i won't be the only one) /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine_unicode.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine_tsx11.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine.so is not a

Hi, I use attachment_fu in one of my apps and recently I''ve realized that udpates are taking too much time. After some debugging I''ve found that attachment_fu is calling after_attachment_saved callback no mather if attachemnt has changed or not. For example this code: after_attachment_saved do |photo| logger.info "after_attachment_saved" end # in console...

...s. Then we have to build the new packages on which others depend on as a requires. Then we can build the other packages. There were 350 (ish) SRPMs that have produced about 3050 RPMs that all need to be vetted before release. This process NORMALLY takes 10 days (when you get your first security udpates) for CR packages and 21 to 30 days for full tree release. It has been this way for 12 years, and it will be so i the future. If you can't wait 10 days to get the CentOS updates .. then buy RHEL. If you have no idea what CR is .. ask and people can help you on the list. Here is the info in t...

...8-December/005800.html ) .. the actual date of the package build was 30 Oct 2018 08:26:54 PM UTC .. and it was signed and then released initially into CR on 12 Nov 2018. We have since generated any missing announcements to the CR announce list and also any updates to the os/ repo (that live in the udpates/ repo) were announced to this centos-announce list. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail...

...8-December/005800.html ) .. the actual date of the package build was 30 Oct 2018 08:26:54 PM UTC .. and it was signed and then released initially into CR on 12 Nov 2018. We have since generated any missing announcements to the CR announce list and also any updates to the os/ repo (that live in the udpates/ repo) were announced to this centos-announce list. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail...

On 07/08/2020 10:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 8/7/20 3:46 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Le 07/08/2020 ? 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a ?crit?: >>> Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug release and >>> the resolution (thanks to your fast apply in the weekend, thank you) and many >>> update their centos machines on a 2 months base (if not

Anyone used jags.parallel in latest version of R2jags? Ubuntu Oneiric, just ran updates in R to get latest R2jags package which supposedly has added jags.parallel command to send chains to multiple cores ... but when I submit, I get: test <- jags.parallel(d, inits, param, model.file="rats.bug", n.chains=3, n.iter=2000) Error: could not find function

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > I believe duncan's fixed this recently in 235956 and 235955 - does ToT work > for you? It seems like r235955 might have fixed it. However I'm having build issues with ToT in my environment. Is this the right place to check ToT build status: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/one_line_per_build > > On

Does ferret only index, when you create, or udpate a record? Is there a way to make it index prexisting records? Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when i run yum for udpate system show this error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file

Hello, Sacha, le ven. 08 févr. 2019 18:00:22 +0100, a ecrit: > On  Debian GNU/Linux 9.7 (stretch) amd64, we have a bug on the last Xen > Hypervisor version: > > xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282 (Read: 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282-1+deb9u11) > The rollback on the previous package version corrected the problem: > > xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64

Greetings: We have been running a CVS HEAD version of asterisk from Mar 10, 2005 on ix86 (PIII-600) Linux 2.4.27 with ixj (chan_phone) hardware. In a hope of getting better 'chan_skinny' support (to attempt using a Cisco 7920 IP phone) I built asterisk 1.2.40 on this box. Initial tests verify that our previous dialplan is working (iax2 trunks, register sip phones, registering withour SER

I am running Rails 1.10 and wanted to check out the RJS templates. Rails doesn''t seem to find them. I did issue the rake comment update_javascripts and that did not correct the problem. RJS is part of 1.1 right? Any ideas? Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Le 07/08/2020 ? 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a ?crit?: > Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug release and > the resolution (thanks to your fast apply in the weekend, thank you) and many > update their centos machines on a 2 months base (if not worst). I think also > that many users of CentOS user base have not proclamed their > disappointement/the issue on