search for: udpat

...21:35:43) [POST] Parameters: {"action"=>"search_ajax_test", "controller"=>"admin"} Completed in 0.00079 (1272 reqs/sec) | DB: 0.00000 (0%) | 200 OK [http://192.168.15.50/admin/search_ajax_test] This does absolutely nothing at all form_remote_tag ( :udpate => ''form_results'', :url => { :action => :search_ajax_test }, :position => ''bottom'') ...some stuff... end_form_tag but still produces this log message Processing AdminController#search_ajax_test (for 192.168.1...

dear all, I get internet via a proxy server when I try to downlaod package it always fail. Even when i add and environnment variable for the http proxy server. I use windows XP SP2 Sincerly Justin BEM El?ve Ing?nieur Statisticien Economiste BP 294 Yaound?. T?l (00237)9597295.

We are currently using the version of Dovecot (0.99.11) that comes with Redhat Enterpise Linux version 4, running on an IBM x445 server (8 CPU, hyperthreading on, 14GB RAM) using the maildir format. We have had to patch this with a change from 0.99.12 so that it doesn't incorrectly report SASL capability upon connection but otherwise it is the version supplied with the OS (we do this to

On one notebook (so far), I have not picked up the new kernel: kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.i686.rpm I have gotten it on some notebooks. So far the only difference I can see between the systems that MIGHT matter is those that got the update were new installs and had not reached 3 installed kernels. The one that failed already had 3 kernels in /boot. But I seem to recall this was about how

Hey, recently I experienced yum bugs on some servers... A simple 'yum update' gives me the yum usage... I noticed a difference between it and a simple 'yum': ? # yum udpate ? Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities ? usage: yum [options] COMMAND ? # yum ? Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities ? You need to give some command ? usage: yum [options] COMMAND Once, a 'yum clean all' helped and I could update once. But now, I tried several cleanups and I s...

...https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21609 I have coded up the fix as per David's suggestion (added a new header field for DIVariable to separate out ArgNo & LineNo). The proposed diff is attached to the bug. However, there are around 175 testcases across clang & llvm that need to be udpated to reflect the new schema. One such eg: diff --git a/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/debug_info.ll b/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/debug_info.ll index c0939c5..4112f14 100644 --- a/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/debug_info.ll +++ b/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/debug...

After updating this morning cvs udpate -APd rm config.cache ./configure make depend && make i get this when 'make install' : what should i do ? (think i won't be the only one) /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine_unicode.so is not a symbolic link /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/local/lib/libwine_tsx11.so is not a symbolic...

Hi, I use attachment_fu in one of my apps and recently I''ve realized that udpates are taking too much time. After some debugging I''ve found that attachment_fu is calling after_attachment_saved callback no mather if attachemnt has changed or not. For example this code: after_attachment_saved do |photo| logger.info "after_attachment_saved" end # in consol...

...s. Then we have to build the new packages on which others depend on as a requires. Then we can build the other packages. There were 350 (ish) SRPMs that have produced about 3050 RPMs that all need to be vetted before release. This process NORMALLY takes 10 days (when you get your first security udpates) for CR packages and 21 to 30 days for full tree release. It has been this way for 12 years, and it will be so i the future. If you can't wait 10 days to get the CentOS updates .. then buy RHEL. If you have no idea what CR is .. ask and people can help you on the list. Here is the info in...

...8-December/005800.html ) .. the actual date of the package build was 30 Oct 2018 08:26:54 PM UTC .. and it was signed and then released initially into CR on 12 Nov 2018. We have since generated any missing announcements to the CR announce list and also any updates to the os/ repo (that live in the udpates/ repo) were announced to this centos-announce list. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/piperma...

...8-December/005800.html ) .. the actual date of the package build was 30 Oct 2018 08:26:54 PM UTC .. and it was signed and then released initially into CR on 12 Nov 2018. We have since generated any missing announcements to the CR announce list and also any updates to the os/ repo (that live in the udpates/ repo) were announced to this centos-announce list. Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/piperma...

...the CentOS team who do their best to >> deliver the best possible downstream system. I raise my morning coffee mug to >> your health, guys. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Niki >> > I can assure you .. a BUNCH of testing was done. Because of the scope > of this udpate, the CentOS team was looped in during the embargo stage > (we normally are not .. Red Hat Engineering got permission to make this > happen for this issue). Normally we see things that are open source only > .. not embargoed content. Once the embargo gets lifted, the items > become ope...

...send chains to multiple cores ... but when I submit, I get: test <- jags.parallel(d, inits, param, model.file="rats.bug", n.chains=3, n.iter=2000) Error: could not find function "jags.parallel" checked sessionInfo() to be sure I did actually have the udpated version: R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) locale: [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8 [7] LC_PAPER=C LC_NAME=C [9] L...

...I have coded up the fix as per David's suggestion (added a new header >> field for DIVariable to separate out ArgNo & LineNo). The proposed >> diff is attached to the bug. >> >> However, there are around 175 testcases across clang & llvm that need >> to be udpated to reflect the new schema. One such eg: > > > The debug info has changed substantially in the last few months - those > changes made a lot of churn to the test cases and, as a biproduct, made it > unnecessary to update any test cases for this change. Ok. The debug info has indeed...

Does ferret only index, when you create, or udpate a record? Is there a way to make it index prexisting records? Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, I have a server with Centos 5 + DRBD installed and is working fine, but when i run yum for udpate system show this error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/drbd.conf conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbd conflicts between attempted installs of drbd-8.0.12-1.el5.centos and drbd82-8.2.6-1.el5.centos file...

Hello, Sacha, le ven. 08 févr. 2019 18:00:22 +0100, a ecrit: > On  Debian GNU/Linux 9.7 (stretch) amd64, we have a bug on the last Xen > Hypervisor version: > > xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282 (Read: 4.8.5+shim4.10.2+xsa282-1+deb9u11) > The rollback on the previous package version corrected the problem: > > xen-hypervisor-4.8-amd64

...call progress tones heard, sends dtmf, can dial out, but has no dialtone. 2. temporary 'update' (bininstall) install of 1.2.40 overlaying existing CVS HEAD installation: -- existing dialplan works, Phone/phone0 works as in (1) above except for no dialtone. 3. temporary 'udpate' (bininstall) install of 1.2.40 as in (2) above but without new 1.2.40 version of chan_phone.so (instead using our old version of chan_phone.so): -- existing dialplan works, Phone/phone0 works except for no dialtone. 4. test of new chan_phone.so from 1.2.40 replacing the one in our...

I am running Rails 1.10 and wanted to check out the RJS templates. Rails doesn''t seem to find them. I did issue the rake comment update_javascripts and that did not correct the problem. RJS is part of 1.1 right? Any ideas? Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Le 07/08/2020 ? 09:40, Alessandro Baggi a ?crit?: > Probably many users have not updated their machines between the bug release and > the resolution (thanks to your fast apply in the weekend, thank you) and many > update their centos machines on a 2 months base (if not worst). I think also > that many users of CentOS user base have not proclamed their > disappointement/the issue on