search for: typetester

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:00 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:21 AM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> > wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Peter, >>> Thanks for your comments, replies below.

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:21 AM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Peter, >> Thanks for your comments, replies below. >> Teresa >> >> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:08 PM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> >> wrote: >>

Hi, My main concern is this one: > Currently, I am emitting the summary entries at the end, after the metadata nodes. Note that the ModuleSummaryIndex is not currently referenced from the Module, and isn’t currently created when parsing the Module IR bitcode (there is a separate derived class for reading the ModuleSummaryIndex from bitcode). This is because they are not currently used at the

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 8:32 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > Hi Peter, > Thanks for your comments, replies below. > Teresa > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:08 PM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> > wrote: > >> Hi Teresa, >> >> Thanks for sending this proposal out. >> >> I would again like to register my

Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal below. Teresa On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > My main concern is this one: > > > Currently, I am emitting the summary entries at the end, after the > metadata nodes. Note that the ModuleSummaryIndex is not currently > referenced from the Module,

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le mar. 1 mai 2018 à 16:50, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> a > écrit : > >> Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal >> below. Teresa >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Peter, Thanks for your comments, replies below. Teresa On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:08 PM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Teresa, > > Thanks for sending this proposal out. > > I would again like to register my disagreement with the whole idea of > writing summaries in LLVM assembly format. In my view it is clear that this > is not the right

Le mar. 1 mai 2018 à 16:50, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> a écrit : > Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal below. > Teresa > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> My main concern is this one: >> >> > Currently, I am emitting the summary

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> Le mar. 1 mai 2018 à 16:50, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> a >> écrit : >> >>> Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a

> On May 3, 2018, at 2:58 PM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com <mailto:stevenwu at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On May 1, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>

> On May 1, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal below. Teresa > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com <mailto:joker.eph at gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi, > > My main concern is this one: > > >

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:16 PM, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote: > > > On May 1, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Teresa Johnson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Mehdi, thanks for the comments, responses and a tweaked proposal below. > Teresa > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: >

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:52 PM Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:29 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:03 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > Le jeu. 3 mai 2018 à 15:52, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> a > écrit : > >> >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:29 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM Peter Collingbourne via

has anyone in this list ever tried to make a javascript color picker something like http://www.daantje.nl/blog/index.php?buttonID=37 or http://typetester.maratz.com/ i just thought i''d ask before i force myself to doing this. thanks mark renn _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spin...

Le jeu. 3 mai 2018 à 15:52, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> a écrit : > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:29 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI

Hi everyone, I started working on a long-standing request to have the summary dumped in a readable format to text, and specifically to emit to LLVM assembly. Proposal below, please let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Teresa *RFC: LLVM Assembly format for ThinLTO

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > Hi Teresa, > > I have re-read your proposal, and I'm not getting how you plan to > represent combined summaries with this. Unless I'm missing something, there > doesn't seem to be a way to write out summaries that is independent of the > global values that they relate to. Is that

Hi Teresa, I have re-read your proposal, and I'm not getting how you plan to represent combined summaries with this. Unless I'm missing something, there doesn't seem to be a way to write out summaries that is independent of the global values that they relate to. Is that something that you plan to address later? Peter On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:43 AM, Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:29 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM Peter Collingbourne via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Le mar. 1 mai 2018 à 16:50, Teresa Johnson