search for: tuv

hi all, i have a general question (a bit surprised ti's not on the centos faq): we found a bug in a package in a centos install, and we are wondering what the best approach is to get TUV to fix it (and release an update), so it gets fixed in centos rebuild and thus on our nodes. or at the very least to get it on their todo list ;) bugs.centos.org seems an obvious candidate to get them reported via centos to TUV, but as centos doesn't modify the sources, i'm wondering i...

On 07/30/2015 03:37 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > hi all, > > i have a general question (a bit surprised ti's not on the centos faq): > > we found a bug in a package in a centos install, and we are wondering > what the best approach is to get TUV to fix it (and release an update), > so it gets fixed in centos rebuild and thus on our nodes. or at the very > least to get it on their todo list ;) > > bugs.centos.org seems an obvious candidate to get them reported via > centos to TUV, but as centos doesn't modify the sources...

...> On 07/30/2015 03:37 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote: > > hi all, > > > > i have a general question (a bit surprised ti's not on the centos faq): > > > > we found a bug in a package in a centos install, and we are wondering > > what the best approach is to get TUV to fix it (and release an update), > > so it gets fixed in centos rebuild and thus on our nodes. or at the very > > least to get it on their todo list ;) > > > > bugs.centos.org seems an obvious candidate to get them reported via > > centos to TUV, but as centos doesn&...

I need to upgrade PHP because the latest WordPress requires one at least at 5.2.4. What are the tradeoffs of using the php53 packages provided by CentOS versus IUS? I've seen that installing the RHEL-derived php53 requires removing php first and it creates package conflicts because it doesn't provide a virtual php-common package. That suggests I should install the IUS package. Is

Hello a newbie here. The situation is that: 2 machine one master one client Puppet 0.24.5 This my configuration: Client: /etc/puppet/puppetd.conf [puppetd] server = Asus-Vista-Box logdir = /var/log/puppet vardir = /var/lib/puppet rundir = /var/run master /etc/puppet/manifests/classes/sudo.pp class sudo { file { "/etc/sudoers": owner => "root",

I'm not sure if the following is a bug or a feature: > jjmat <- array(1:6, c(2,3), list(c('ABC', 'DEF'), c('xyz', 'tuv', 'qrs'))) > jjdf <- as.data.frame(jjmat) > jjmat['AB', ] Error: subscript out of bounds > jjdf['AB',] xyz tuv qrs ABC 1 3 5 > jjmat[, 'tu'] Error: subscript out of bounds > jjdf[, 'tu'] Error in "[.data.frame"(...

If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this blog: http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/ In a nutshell: some Perl apps are 100x slower on RedHat / CentOS 5 compared to other distributions. Bugzilla entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=379791 -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

...2) series_2=series_1/sqrt(2)*5 #To get student t distributed variabler with standard #deviation equal to 5 I rescale the first series #When i check the first series with the ghyp package, the result coincides with #the sum of log likelihood calculated with dt(x, df, ncp, log = FALSE) fit_1=fit.tuv(series_1, silent=T, symmetric=T) fit_1 sum(log(dt(series_1,coef(fit_1)$nu,0))) #The two log likelihood estimates is approximatly equal, and the parameters are #sensible. #When I check series 2, i get a very different result. The estimate for mu and nu #is still sensible, but the log likelihood...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 14/02/15 05:05, Peng Yu wrote: > Hi, > > I don't see the official doc for CentOS 7. Does anybody know where > is it? Thanks. > > https://www.centos.org/docs/ > and same for CentOS 6 .. it seems difficult to know what to do for those docs, so I'd be in favor of either finding a solution (involving lawyers) or just

Hi, When browsing the (excellent) deployment guide I found the following broken links: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Deployment_Guide/s2-basic-firewall-securitylevel-enable.html ('Next' link from http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Deployment_Guide/s2-basic-firewall-securitylevel.html) http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/5.2/Deployment_Guide/s2-iptables-options-commands.html

...; I'm comparing it to the Adaptec SCSI card I have in the machine and an Intel Pro 100 network card). No heat sink on main (DSP??) chip. Chip details removed from silicon chip covers. Claims to be FCC compliant but doesn't mention which parts of the rules or a registration number. Bears a TUV Rheinland Product Saftey logo. Digium X100P - Larger form factor with longer PCI Pins. Heat sink on main (DSP??) chip. Chips have all marking intact. Bears an FCC & CE logo and quote the relevant rules. It's supported! :-) Next using an infrared heat gun I checked the running tempera...

hi, since i don't use centos very heavily i'm not too familiar with the centos/rhel release/update process (and i didn't do much research on this): is it normal behavior that through the use of "yum update" systems are forced to follow the point releases of a major release (5.0 -> 5.1 -> 5.2, etc)? is there a way and would it make sense to stay within one particular

Hi, I'm trying to write a general-purpose "lexicon" class and associated methods for storing and accessing information about large numbers of specific words (e.g., their frequencies in different genres). Crucial to making such a class practically useful is to get hashing working correctly so that information about specific words can be accessed quickly. But I've never really

There was a critical vulnerability in Kubernetes published earlier in the week - CVE-2018-1002105. The vulnerability has been patched both the upstream project and by TUV, but the fix doesn't seem to have made it into the CentOS OpenShift build for 3.11: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/paas/x86_64/openshift-origin311/ The fixed version is 3.11.43, version on the mirror is 3.11.0. I'm not 100% certain of the support state of OpenShift in CentOS as it...

I need to configure a small proxy appliance which doesn't require a lot of CPU power. I'm looking for any warnings this group may have regarding CentOS-5 on the following: - Acer AspireRevo 3610 (Atom CPU) - Dell Inspiron 537s (Celeron) - Any other small machines you might recommend (UL approved) I need to implement dual NICs, and for the Dell it should be no problem finding a

Hi. I'm new to configuring Clustering . The CentOS 5.5 guest machines will be running on ESXi 4.1 . I'm configuring the clustering using "Conga" . I see that there is support for using ESX to do the fencing. The problem I have is that the guest machines are not allowed to have access the "management network" as per security policies. The guest machines don't no

In my personal environment, I've got 7 machines running, with 4 of those machines running various flavors of Linux (CentOS 5 x86_64; Fedora 15 x86_64; Fedora 14 i686). Based upon some issues with the Fedora 15 x86_64 machine I'm considering dropping Fedora 15 in favor of CentOS 6.1. My questions are: On the networking side, has a there been a move to change the ethernet names from

Hi, How to get all list item to one string variable. example a[1]="abc" b[1]="def" output="abc def" Thanks B.Purushothaman -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/How-to-get-all-list-item-to-one-string-variable-tp4636283.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

...ng my breath for it to work with C6 even if it is ever released. Chrome/Chromium is pretty much history too (libs too old). So Firefox is the only game in town. Even lesser knowns like Midori won't work either. Considering the amount of time left in the C6 support cycle, one would have thought TUV would have worked with Google to find a solution but I haven't heard a peep. How can XP, an ancient OS going EOL in a few months, still be supported for the latest Chromium but C6 not? Does anyone know of secret plans to eventually support Chrome/Chromium on C6? (crossing fingers)

Hi List Is there going to CentOS 7 for i686 architecture ? If yes , when will it be released ? Thanks Jatin