I bugged Jim about this daily on IRC for a bit, and he had gotten some
tractIon from legal, but that was several months ago.
Again, a link to http://docs.redhat.com would be nice if nothing else.
On Saturday, February 14, 2015, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 14/02/15 05:05, Peng Yu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't see the official doc for CentOS 7. Does anybody know where
> > is it? Thanks.
> >
> > https://www.centos.org/docs/
> >
>
> and same for CentOS 6 .. it seems difficult to know what to do for
> those docs, so I'd be in favor of either finding a solution (involving
> lawyers) or just getting rid of that /docs (as it doesn't look nice in
> the current state)
>
> - --
>
> Fabian Arrotin
> The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
> gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlTfCVYACgkQnVkHo1a+xU4JuACdFBDNKIdKswyw4JEU17ayXCA9
> QJcAoJWnSDZbRxFLv9XTSL83ndXAnVo9
> =FpVh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-docs mailing list
> CentOS-docs at centos.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/attachments/20150214/6b647362/attachment-0002.html>