search for: turnarounds

I need a good server vendor(not dell) that i can get a server from that is 1u rack mountable(2u max) with a decent turnaround(i am hoping if i order tomorrow i can get it within two weeks. who would you recommend? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn.

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 8092 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20070319/dce86a16/attachment.gif

Not to be a pain, but I am experiencing turn around times of my own posts in excess of SIX hours. Is this usual for this list. I don't notice this on any other lists I monitor. Return-Path: <samba-admin@lists.samba.org> Received: from lists.samba.org (samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) by netexpress.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g222iKO27320 for

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 8092 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20070319/dce86a16/attachment.gif

Alright folks, I put in a fix for camping and added the patch by Thomas Hurst for the accf_http deferred accept settings for FreeBSD. As usual, please test this release out and let me know if it has any additional problems. I''ll be working on win32 builds today and tomorrow with Luis. Install with: sudo gem install fastthread --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases sudo gem

Thank you for reading this, sorry to waste bandwidth otherwise. I am part of a US company looking for someone to setup a demo IVR system for us. I seem unable with my current knowledge to pull this off myself. The demo is the regular enter your id and validate/repeat/continue methodoligy you put up with in everyday life. I would like to have the validation and other parts done via database

Hi all, As per the instructions here <http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access>, I contacted Chris Lattner to obtain commit access but haven't received a response (either positive or negative). What's the expected turnaround time for this (I contacted him five days ago)? In case he's currently unavailable, is there someone else I could contact? Thanks,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek < kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > >> >> Give a compelling argument and I might :) >> > > The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. > In my experience it has never happened that I ran "make check" on a wrong >

On Apr 17, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/17/2013 12:15 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > Give a compelling argument and I might :) > > The cost is the extra time spent verifying that the binaries are fresh. In my

The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround seems to be 3.5 hours. clang: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html lld: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html polly: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.html > On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Tobias Grosser via llvm-dev

Why does zfs define raidz/raidz2/mirror/stripe at the pool level instead of the filesystem/volume level? A sample use case: two filesystems in a eight disk pool. The first filesystems is a stripe across four mirrors. The second filesystems is a raidz2. Both utilizing the free space in the 8 disk pool as needed. Thanks in advance... This message posted from opensolaris.org

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > SCE tuning does turn on the .debug_aranges section. Our debugger team > really cares about startup cost. Turnaround time in general is huge for our > licensees, to the point where we support edit-and-continue (minimal > rebuild, live-patch the running process). > Ah, good to know! I'd

Hey Timo, Thanks for the quick turnaround, once we have the test results I'll contact you again. Should I also include instructions on how to run the a self contained server with a dummy backend so you can independently verify our results? Leander Beernaert Proton AG ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, February 23rd, 2023 at 8:59 PM, Timo Sirainen <timo at sirainen.com>

Hi, We have implemented a zfs files system for home directories and have enabled it with quotas+snapshots. However the snapshots are causing an issue with the user quotas. The default snapshot files go under ~username/.zfs/snapshot, which is a part of the user file system. So if the quota is 10G and the snapshots total to 2G, this adds to the disk space used by the user. Is there any turnaround

Hi, wasn't the change of the mailing list software some time ago expected to fix the long delays on the Asterisk lists? I still see turnaround times of half an hour, or so. Can others confirm this? Does anybody have an idea about the reason? cu Reinhard

On 31.07.2018 09:30, ????? wrote: >>>> Perhaps for whose interested - IETF RFC 7027 specifies for TLS use: >>>> >>>> [ brainpoolP256r1 | brainpoolP384r1 | brainpoolP512r1 ] >>>> >>>> And thus t1 would not work anyway. However, having tested r1 the result >>>> was just the same. >>>> >>>> A tcpdump

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018, at 05:47, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > On Jan 18, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > > > > 2018-01-18 6:40 GMT+01:00 Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org>: > >> Great, I think that that would be a fine approach: you can have the cmake logic detect which version of isl is installed

I develop using Rails on win32 in a corporate environment. While most stuff works, there are a few annoyances that I deal with on a regular basis. It would be great if stuff like this could get cleaned up. I have filed a few bugs against Rails that have gotten no attention, and asked a question on ruby-talk that never got answered (though I posted via the newsgroup, maybe the gateway is

Hi, folks. I'm senior online editor at CIO.com, and I'm working on an article for which I'd very much like your help. There's often a lack of communication between techies and top company management. Maybe they don't want to hear about problems; perhaps you give them technical details that are far more granular than they want to know. But dealing with spam is a topic

Short version: Is there a way to enforce use of this cache: ./source3/smbd/statcache.c I noticed it is absent from the ./source4 directory I limited server max protocol = SMB2 but that didn't do it. Long story: ----------- My samba server (4.2.14) hosts a couple of game install trees for a Windows 7 computer. Some of the games cause storms of stat(2) system calls, here is a partial