search for: turnaround

I need a good server vendor(not dell) that i can get a server from that is 1u rack mountable(2u max) with a decent turnaround(i am hoping if i order tomorrow i can get it within two weeks. who would you recommend? -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the...

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 8092 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20070319/dce86a16/attachment.gif

Not to be a pain, but I am experiencing turn around times of my own posts in excess of SIX hours. Is this usual for this list. I don't notice this on any other lists I monitor. Return-Path: <samba-admin@lists.samba.org> Received: from lists.samba.org (samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) by netexpress.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g222iKO27320 for

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/gif Size: 8092 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20070319/dce86a16/attachment.gif

Alright folks, I put in a fix for camping and added the patch by Thomas Hurst for the accf_http deferred accept settings for FreeBSD. As usual, please test this release out and let me know if it has any additional problems. I''ll be working on win32 builds today and tomorrow with Luis. Install with: sudo gem install fastthread --source=http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/releases sudo gem

...yself. The demo is the regular enter your id and validate/repeat/continue methodoligy you put up with in everyday life. I would like to have the validation and other parts done via database (Postgres or MySQL). This is a FOR PAY job, with the potential for landing the full project. I need a quick turnaround! I have gotten myself in a serious time crunch before I have to go with another proposed M$ solution and a great deal more money. I need for contacts as soon as possible. I would ask that you be able to accept either PayPal or PO or work till you get a check. I DO NOT know how to handle the pot...

Hi all, As per the instructions here <http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#obtaining-commit-access>, I contacted Chris Lattner to obtain commit access but haven't received a response (either positive or negative). What's the expected turnaround time for this (I contacted him five days ago)? In case he's currently unavailable, is there someone else I could contact? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Böhme Software Engineer mboehme at google.com Google Germany GmbH Erika-Mann-Str. 33 80636 München Geschäftsführer: Matthew Scott Sucherman...

...ot;make check" on a wrong > set of binaries. On the other hand, it does happen that I run "make check" > repeatedly, when working on a testcase (or a set of testcases), or when I > fixed something that previously caused some testcases to be XFAILed. If development speed / turnaround time is important for you, 'make' is the wrong solution in the first plane. Use a cmake+ninja build, which is way faster, especially for null builds (where all the build system does is make sure there's nothing new to build, or very few things to build). Here's a ninja build run on...

...an "make check" on a wrong set of binaries. On the other hand, it does happen that I run "make check" repeatedly, when working on a testcase (or a set of testcases), or when I fixed something that previously caused some testcases to be XFAILed. > > If development speed / turnaround time is important for you, 'make' is the wrong solution in the first plane. Use a cmake+ninja build, which is way faster, especially for null builds (where all the build system does is make sure there's nothing new to build, or very few things to build). > > Here's a ninja b...

The bot hiccupped earlier but looks stable now. The average turnaround seems to be 3.5 hours. clang: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/clang/index.html lld: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/lld/index.html polly: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/coverage/coverage-reports/polly/index.html > On Sep 23, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Tobias Gr...

Why does zfs define raidz/raidz2/mirror/stripe at the pool level instead of the filesystem/volume level? A sample use case: two filesystems in a eight disk pool. The first filesystems is a stripe across four mirrors. The second filesystems is a raidz2. Both utilizing the free space in the 8 disk pool as needed. Thanks in advance... This message posted from opensolaris.org

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > SCE tuning does turn on the .debug_aranges section. Our debugger team > really cares about startup cost. Turnaround time in general is huge for our > licensees, to the point where we support edit-and-continue (minimal > rebuild, live-patch the running process). > Ah, good to know! I'd be curious to know about the performance tradeoff when they're disabled if you ever happen to have data around...

Hey Timo, Thanks for the quick turnaround, once we have the test results I'll contact you again. Should I also include instructions on how to run the a self contained server with a dummy backend so you can independently verify our results? Leander Beernaert Proton AG ------- Original Message ------- On Thursday, February 23rd, 2023...

...h quotas+snapshots. However the snapshots are causing an issue with the user quotas. The default snapshot files go under ~username/.zfs/snapshot, which is a part of the user file system. So if the quota is 10G and the snapshots total to 2G, this adds to the disk space used by the user. Is there any turnaround for this. One is to increase the quota for the user, which we dont want to implement. Can the default snapshots be taken to some other location outside the user home directory. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/p...

Hi, wasn't the change of the mailing list software some time ago expected to fix the long delays on the Asterisk lists? I still see turnaround times of half an hour, or so. Can others confirm this? Does anybody have an idea about the reason? cu Reinhard

On 31.07.2018 09:30, ????? wrote: >>>> Perhaps for whose interested - IETF RFC 7027 specifies for TLS use: >>>> >>>> [ brainpoolP256r1 | brainpoolP384r1 | brainpoolP512r1 ] >>>> >>>> And thus t1 would not work anyway. However, having tested r1 the result >>>> was just the same. >>>> >>>> A tcpdump

...w versions of isl. > > It seems like you can choose how frequently to update. Updating every 6 > to 12 months doesn’t seem overly onerous, and still gives the benefit of > updates from the upstream project. We tend to update isl at certain times more often and prefer to have a fast turnaround in updates. The reason is that if a new LLVM change exposes a bug we would like to fix the bug in isl immediately and want to get this fix out as fast as possible. Should we in this case ask all buildbot admins to update? What about the debian/ubuntu builds? Best, Tobias

...group, maybe the gateway is one-way?). I don''t mean to sound bitter, I''m aware that the problem is most likely that no one can really test these problems. Do y''all have any advice regarding what I can do to help get bugs like these fixed? Are my expectations regarding turnaround time just unrealistic? Rails bugs: - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4650 - http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/4684 Ruby bug (is there a Ruby bug tracker?): - http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/102cad122462d930 Thanks, - Will -- Posted via http://www.ruby-fo...

...self somehow, and "what's important about fighting spam" has a lot of leeway. I'll be sure to stop by here (as I expect others want to participate in the conversation), but feel free to cc me with your response or send me a private message. I'm hoping for a rather fast turnaround on this article, so please blurt out your first thoughts rather than plan on writing a nice, leisurely response. If all goes well, I'd like to get this article posted in the next couple of weeks. Please be sure to let me know how to refer to you in the article; the usual format is &amp...

...the FS buffer cache of the local OS if it wasn't a network drive. Is there a way to cause the cache to be used for a specific client, or a specific share? To clarify, I know it will still be slow since instead of locally cached system calls into the Windows kernel it will still have a network turnaround. However, right now I am doing actual system calls on the server side, and exchanging those for pure userland replies will help. I also know iSCSI would help but it's a pain. Thank you Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <crac...