search for: turfe

...g buit contrasts, such as contr.helmert, contr.poly, contr.treatment and contr.sum. How to get output similar to that from SAS, mainly for the three first contrasts, once that fourth contrast is contr.helmert? ### SAS INPUT proc glm; classes TRA; model X1 X2 = TRA; contrast 'TESTE vs TURFE' TRA 1 -1 0; contrast 'TESTE vs TURNA' TRA 1 0 -1; contrast 'TURFE vs TURNA' TRA 0 1 -1; contrast 'Ho:TESTE=TURFE=TURNA' TRA 1 1 -2, TRA 1 -1 0; manova h=TRA / printe printh; run; OUTPUT (some parts were removed)...

Hi, I'm looking for any information on calculating and using Shapley Values in a TURF context. A paper was presented at an S-Plus conference about this: Conklin M., Lipovetsky S. Modern Marketing Research Combinatorial Computations: Shapley Value versus TURF Tools, Proceedings of 1998 International S-Plus User Conference, Oct. 8-9, 1998, Washington, DC, MathSoft Inc. Does anyone have

Hi! I am trying to program a TURF analysis and have looked everywhere on the web to see if I can find any clues on how to do this. I've looked at SAS manuals as well. If anyone has ever heard of this kind of marketing analysis and has programmed it I'd be interested in learning how. Any help you could give me is greatly appreciated! Lorena Adams Lorena Adams The National Food Laboratory

Hi everyone, We have a particular user on our Asterisk 1.4.x system who always listens to his voicemail messages via email. - Is there some way to send the voicemail ONLY to email and not retain them on the phone? - Alternatively, can the voicemail system only keep, say, just the last 10 messages (as backup in case of email delivery failure or a message getting deleted in email accidentally

As an agronomist, sometimes i need to perform statistical analisys on "weird" field data, like 3 or 4 level split plot design. I've read both the help of the program, some books and manual about S and "Venables/Ripley, Modern Applied Statistics with S", but i still have problems in (i suppose) formulae sintax. I'm trying to perform AOV, as explained showed in

As an agronomist, sometimes i need to perform statistical analisys on "weird" field data, like 3 or 4 level split plot design. I've read both the help of the program, some books and manual about S and "Venables/Ripley, Modern Applied Statistics with S", but i still have problems in (i suppose) formulae sintax. I'm trying to perform AOV, as explained in "Random

Dear R-help, First of all, thank you VERY much for any help you have time to offer. I greatly appreciate it. I would like to write a function that, given an arbitrary number of factors from a data frame, tabulates the number of occurrences of each unique combination of the factors. Cleary, this works: > table(horse,date,surface) <SNIP> , , surface = TURF

Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard: > >> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling <rhurlin at gwdg.de> wrote: >> >> Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202? >> >> It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on >> /pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at >>

Does net rpc join work in SAMBA (using HEAD from CVS compiled this morning) Configured with ACL, with PAM, and with WINBIND. It seems that I cannot rejoin my domain (PDC is NT4sp6a) after I turfed machine.sid and secrets.tdb. I tried using smbpasswd first and was informed to use net join rpc instead. Logs available if needed. Thanx Hans

Afternoon folks: I'm getting a program crash when I try to run demo(rgl). The following error details result: RGUI caused a stack fault in module NVOPENGL.DLL at 017f:695280f0. Registers: EAX=00000002 CS=017f EIP=695280f0 EFLGS=00010246 EBX=00000001 SS=0187 ESP=00572000 EBP=004d1208 ECX=042f1f01 DS=0187 ESI=004d1208 FS=5d1f EDX=00442d84 ES=0187 EDI=042f1f3c GS=5d0e Bytes at CS:EIP: 53 56 8b

Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202? It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on /pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/misc/cran/, but without an R-devel.tar.gz tarball ... Is this intended? Any clarification would be appreciated. Thanks and greetings, Rainer Hurling [1]

Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would think that it undermines RH. But I'm still new/old to all of this. It used to be the big argument was between Unix from Berkeley(4.? I think) and SysIII/V. Always always battles for turf.

Good morning, I would appreciate some help. SAMBA is new turf. I am working out of a John Blair Book SAMBA: Integrating UNIX and Windows 1998 PROBLEM: unable to print to the 2nd of two printers on a samba host. ENVIRONMENT: -4 systems in a home network; connected to an HP hub (10 meg) -3 systems run Red Hat linux 9.0 (system names: snoopy, white, olblue) -4th system runs Windows 2000

I've pored through the documentation, wiki, lists, etc, and I can't seem to come to a concise conclusion on how to accomplish this. My specific scenario is the following. I have a samba PDC domain called domainA, and an AD domain called domainB. domainA and domainB are different named domains, and they each authenticate logins and credentials on their own turf. The users on domainA

While burning in a new desktop Epox KT-880 workstation, I'm running on my old K6-III at 360MHz. Before new X updates (put everything in today, kernel, elfutils, ntpd - Selinux issues? - xorg, ...) with my PCI ATI 7000 (Radeon) on a 19" Samsung 950b @ 1024x768 (one of 5 different resolutions I commonly use), I could scroll smoothly at reasonable rates. With the new stuff I get severe

On 31.07.2018 03:32, ????? wrote: >> Perhaps for whose interested - IETF RFC 7027 specifies for TLS use: >> >> [ brainpoolP256r1 | brainpoolP384r1 | brainpoolP512r1 ] >> >> And thus t1 would not work anyway. However, having tested r1 the result >> was just the same. >> >> A tcpdump during the openssl test [ s_server | s_client ] then revealed

Am 05.09.2015 um 19:09 schrieb peter dalgaard: > >> On 05 Sep 2015, at 13:54 , Rainer Hurling <rhurlin at gwdg.de> wrote: >> >> Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard: >>> >>>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling <rhurlin at gwdg.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1]

It's a trademark issue. CentOS is not Red Hat, so they can't use Red Hat's trademarks. Nothing more, nothing less. On 14/12/14 09:50 PM, Clayton Kirkwood wrote: > Personally, I am agnostic. I've just read thru Centos documentation that > there is a big effort to remove all upstream personalities from Centos. > Personally, I don't see why RH is doing this. I would

> >>> Perhaps for whose interested - IETF RFC 7027 specifies for TLS use: >>> >>> [ brainpoolP256r1 | brainpoolP384r1 | brainpoolP512r1 ] >>> >>> And thus t1 would not work anyway. However, having tested r1 the result >>> was just the same. >>> >>> A tcpdump during the openssl test [ s_server | s_client ] then revealed

> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling <rhurlin at gwdg.de> wrote: > > Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202? > > It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on > /pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at > http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/misc/cran/, but without an R-devel.tar.gz > tarball ... > > Is this