search for: tuneables

...of plans. In the meantime, I'm going to continue to check the usual manuals/google sources to see if I can find anything. I haven't as yet and am short on time with this. Basically looking to see if this is an actual bug that might require a patch/upgrade, or something I can fix with some tuneables. Thanks, Mike

Greetings, Last April, in this discussion... http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=143517 ...we never found out how (or if) the Sun 6120 (T4) array can be configured to ignore cache flush (sync-cache) requests from hosts. We''re about to reconfigure a 6120 here for use with ZFS (S10U4), and the evil tuneable zfs_nocacheflush is not going to serve us well (there is a ZFS

Hi all, A few questions. - Is POSIX locking enabled when using the native client? I would assume yes. - What other settings/tuneables exist when it comes to file locking? Krist -- Vriendelijke Groet | Best Regards | Freundliche Gr??e | Cordialement ------------------------------ Krist van Besien | Senior Architect | Red Hat EMEA Cloud Practice | RHCE | RHCSA Open Stack @: krist at redhat.com | M: +41-79-5936260 -------------...

Here is what I imagined (just vague thoughts, nothing polished): Let's suppose we have a hypotetical library called "Free Universal Codec Kit" - ..um...well.. Frunick for short :) (Of course I am not proposing this name, I'm sure the suits in the industry would not like it...but for my example its OK ;) Now, an application should do something like this: #include

Here is what I imagined (just vague thoughts, nothing polished): Let's suppose we have a hypotetical library called "Free Universal Codec Kit" - ..um...well.. Frunick for short :) (Of course I am not proposing this name, I'm sure the suits in the industry would not like it...but for my example its OK ;) Now, an application should do something like this: #include

Hi all, This is just an idea I had over the weekend; I was wondering if instead of storing the indexes/caches on disk, it would be possible to have an option to store them in a remote database (eg mysql). There are several issues that we currently have with scaling dovecot, and I think that if it could store indexes in an external database we could alleviate most of these issues. In no particular

I sent a note about this a couple of weeks ago, but have not heard anything. I'm really getting a bit desperate. I have a system that I am trying to upgrade from 8.2 to 9.0. I have built it and installed the kernel, but it fails to boot. The boot freezes after probing for my hard drives during the probe of the CDROM. It just sits there, seemingly forever, though I have never waited longer

Hello everyone, We are trying to track down some samba issues and wondering there are some settings we can tweak. We have a new Supermicro server running the following with 192GB of RAM, 32 active CPUs and 54TB of usable zfs mirrors (raid10). uname -a FreeBSD hostname 11.1-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p4 #0: Tue Nov 14 06:12:40 UTC 2017 root at

That's what UCI is trying to do. I'm hoping for just a simple unified Ogg interface for the audio codecs that Ogg supports. -dwh- On 31 Jan 2003, Csillag Krist?f wrote: > Here is what I imagined (just vague thoughts, nothing polished): > > Let's suppose we have a hypotetical library called > "Free Universal Codec Kit" - ..um...well.. Frunick for short :)

Oops...I missed the address -----Forwarded mail----- From: Csillag Kristóf <fenwick@freemail.hu> To: vorvis-dev@xiph.org, speex-dev@xiph.org, flac-dev@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Unified codec interface Date: 31 Jan 2003 00:21:35 +0100 Here is what I imagined (just vague thoughts, nothing polished): Let's suppose we have a hypotetical library called "Free Universal Codec

Hi all, does anybody knows about the following Error ?!??! [2000/09/25 17:40:55, 0] smbd/files.c:file_new(85) ERROR! Out of file structures seems to be the max open files problem, am I right ? We did a research in some news and usergroups and in some answers it was mentioned, to compile samba with the sfio package to avoid using the select(3). Is that right ? Does anybody has any

Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by dev_watchdog. This event is reached when transmission queue is having problems to transmit packets. This could happen for any reason. To enable it, driver should have .ndo_tx_timeout implemented. This commit brings back virtnet_reset method to recover TX queues from a error state. That function is called by schedule_work method and

Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by dev_watchdog. This event is reached when transmission queue is having problems to transmit packets. This could happen for any reason. To enable it, driver should have .ndo_tx_timeout implemented. This commit brings back virtnet_reset method to recover TX queues from a error state. That function is called by schedule_work method and

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:36:36PM -0300, Julio Faracco wrote: > Driver virtio_net is not handling error events for TX provided by > dev_watchdog. This event is reached when transmission queue is having > problems to transmit packets. This could happen for any reason. To > enable it, driver should have .ndo_tx_timeout implemented. > > This commit brings back virtnet_reset method

There are a number of rather low listen() queue limits in Samba which we also ran into on our pretty busy (around 300-500 users/server) Samba servers, also on FreeBSD 11.1 (six servers with 256GB RAM, 2x10Gbit ethernet, 140TB of storage). Please find enclosed a patch we use to up the limits (quite a bit). The patch makes it possible to control the queue limit via the config file using a “socket

I apologize for the delay in response time :) I got busy. Now I'm back :) > >Go read a basic document on Internet Standards. Encoding meta > >information (especially type) in a filename or URL is broken and wrong. > > I wasn't suggesting it be encoded in the URL.. only that if you go to the > URL (not the client-listen url, the website url) there should state

I saw in another post that a best practices doc will be coming, but I figured I would try to get this working. I''m trying to understand why zfs uses so many "zfs create" so I can use it better. What makes sense is that each zfs fs can have it''s own options (compression, nfs, atime, quota, etc). I really love this because it is so tuneable -- compression on these

At 08:19 PM 10/17/2001 -0600, you wrote: >I apologize for the delay in response time :) > >I got busy. Now I'm back :) Cool, and you replied to me first! ;) > > over and over for every station, wasting screen real estate and > bandwidth both. > >Ah, in general I'm not dicussing here what's shown on screen. Only how >the information is stored and used.

I created a btrfs file system with a single 420 megabyte file in it. And, when I look at the file system with btrfs-debug, I see gigantic extents, as large as 99 megabytes: > $ sudo btrfs-debug-tree /dev/sdb | grep extent > ... > dev extent chunk_tree 3 > dev extent chunk_tree 3 > extent data disk byte 80084992 nr 99958784 > extent data

At 09:10 AM 9/17/2001 -0600, you wrote: >That's what logs are for. This is not a public log. Things are not >tracked over time. The information is only valid for a 'ttl' period. I'm just going to let this topic about listener counts lie.. I think enough people besides myself have stepped up in favor of it, and you have your reasons for not wanting to have it. It's