search for: transmogrifier

Hi all, I''m new to rails after having used perl for most of these things, and am trying to get my head around the generate script for a project playing around with. If I do: ./scripts/generate controller Device I get app/controllers/device_controller.rb where I can then add: scaffold :device However, if I want to actually generate the scaffolding so I can make some changes:

Hello all, Quick question (possibly!) - I''ve got a few records indexed and doing a search for ''test'' reports in no hits even though I know the word ''tests'' exists in the indexed field. Doing a search for ''tests'' produces a result. I would have thought that ''test'' would match ''tests'' but no such

Hi, I put the following in my environment.rb file: ActionController::CgiRequest::DEFAULT_SESSION_OPTIONS.update (:database_manager => CGI::Session::ActiveRecordStore) Runnning WEBrick via "script/server" and trying to load any page served by a controller results in an error like the following: #<ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: ERROR: null value in column "id"

> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 11:52:50 -0700 > From: Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> > Subject: [LLVMdev] Release Notes: Volunteers needed > We need some volunteers to help with the 3.0 release notes. Traditionally, Chris has been the one to go > through all the commits (6 months worth!) and come up with a concrete list of things that have changed in 3.0. > Ideally,

Hello guys, I''m pretty new to using AAF and am having a slight problem with using a condition. I have the following code @results = SupplierProduct.find_by_contents(params[:search], :conditions => [''area_id = ?'', @area]) and it seems the condition isn''t being applied. Does anyone have any pointers? Cheers, Alastair -- Posted via

It seems like everyone now has a RoR type framework: Perl: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ PHP: http://cakephp.org/ Python: http://www.django.com ASP.NET: http://www.castleproject.org/index.php/Main_Page etc., etc. Has a revolution begun with the birth of these "Web 2.0" frameworks? Its going to be interesting when the tech media begins its mass hype like it did SOAP, XML, etc. a

...e ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $EXTIF -o $INTIF -j ACCEPT $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -i $INTIF -o $EXTIF -j ACCEPT $IPTABLES -A FORWARD -j LOG # Enable simple NAT $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $EXTIF -j MASQUERADE echo -en "\n\nFirewall loaded. System secure\n" transmogrifier:~#

If I do: script/generate controller Photo I get a controller named photo_controller. OTOH, if I do: script/generate scaffold Photo I get a controller named photos_controller. (Note that the controller name is pluralized). I realize that I''m specifying the controller name explicitly in the first case, but it seems odd to me that the scaffold command generates a pluralized

> The point here is that XPL needs to keep track of what a given variable > represents at the source level. If the compiler sees a map that is > initially small it might represent it in LLVM assembly as a vector of > pairs. Later on, it gets optimized into being a hash table. In order to > do that and keep track of things, I need to know that the vector of > pairs is

Hi all, I''m trying to run a Story Runner integration test that uploads a file through Attachment-fu. I''ve tried various ways of specifying the file data, from custom mocks: class MockFile < Struct.new (:original_filename, :read, :content_type); end fdata = MockFile.new "test_upload.txt", "Test Upload", "text/plain" to

The laws already exist: Disturbing the peace, Misappropriation of public funds, Prohibition on unfunded mandates. What's lacking is prosecutors, judges, and juries who see the politicians as getting in the way of the statesmen and the people. To drag this back towards On Topic, it seems to me that the ntp folks might be petitioned to write up and submit to the Congress, a paper

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 17:13, Chris Lattner wrote: > > The point here is that XPL needs to keep track of what a given variable > > represents at the source level. If the compiler sees a map that is > > initially small it might represent it in LLVM assembly as a vector of > > pairs. Later on, it gets optimized into being a hash table. In order to > > do that and keep

On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 13:01, Vipin Gokhale wrote: > While on the subject of annotating bytecode with analysis info, could I > entice someone to also think about carrying other types of source-level > annotations through into bytecode ? This is particularly useful for > situations where one wants to use LLVM infrastructure for its > whole-program optimization capabilities,

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sun, 16 Nov 2003, Reid Spencer wrote: > > >>On Sun, 2003-11-16 at 11:17, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> >>>No, it's all or nothing. Once linked, they cannot be seperated (easily). >>>However, especially when using the JIT, there is little overhead for >>>running a gigantic program that only has 1% of the functions

Is R an appropriate tool for data manipulation and data reshaping and data organizing? I think so but someone who recently joined our group thinks not. The new recruit believes that python or another language is a far better tool for developing data manipulation scripts that can be then used by several members of our research group. Her assessment is that R is useful only when it comes to data