search for: transation

Dear listers, Here we have a strange result we can hardly cope with. We want to compare a null mixed model with a mixed model with one independent variable. > lmmedt1<-lme(mediane~1, random=~1|site, na.action=na.omit, data=bdd2) > lmmedt9<-lme(mediane~log(0.0001+transat), random=~1|site, na.action=na.omit, data=bdd2) Using the Akaike Criterion and selMod of the package pgirmess

"in non linear modelling finding appropriate starting values is something like an art"... (maybe from somewhere in Crawley , 2007) Here a colleague and I just want to compare different response models to a null model. This has worked OK for almost all the other data sets except that one (dumped below). Whatever our trials and algorithms, even subsetting data (to check if some singular

...oblem i have is when i use the mobile phone to make a sip call to another extension and i hang up before the call is answered the phone never stops ringing. when i use wireshark to see whats going on it appears that when the mobile phone sends a sip cancel message asterisk replies with 481 call/transation does not exist for some reason. any idea why that is? and what is going wrong? i can probably provide a packet dump if needed. the strange part is that if i on the mobile phone enable "receive incoming calls" and then remove it, everything works just fine. it continues to work even aft...

...#39;s objections: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg22256.html While there''s no need to do a full commit for regular files, a subvolume may get a different treatment. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg23087.html: "That a subvol/snapshot may appear after crash if transation commit did not happen does not feel so good. We know that the subvol is only scheduled for deletion and needs to be processed by cleaner. From that point I''d rather see the commit to happen to avoid any unexpected surprises. A subvolume that re-appears still holds the data references and...

?????????? ???????? ???????? ???? ???????????? ?????????????????????????? ???????????? ?? ?? ??????????????, ?????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ?? ???????? ???????????????? ???? ???????????? ?? ?????????????????????? ?????????? ???????? ???????????? ???? ???????????? ?????? ?????????????????????????? ?? ????????????????? , ?? ???????????? ?????????????????? ??????????????,

Hi, The title tells it all. How do I remove a transation when using the Globalize plugin. Thanks. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gman...

...n is always up-to-date across the cluster. This is implemented by storing the client information in a persistent database using a new "ctdb ptrans" command. * The transaction code for persistent databases now retries until it is able to take the transaction lock. This makes the transation semantics compatible with Samba's implementation. * Locking helpers are created with vfork(2) instead of fork(2), providing a performance improvement. * config.guess has been updated to the latest upstream version so CTDB should build on more platforms. Reporting bugs & Developmen...

Hola, me llamo Ángel y estoy haciendo una aplicación en Java que usa funciones ya implementadas en R, siento molestarte para esta tontería, pero es que ya ni paso de la instalación del JRI. A ver si me puedes ayudar, te lo agradecería muchísimo!! A ver, yo leí en la página de JRI que hacen falta las mismas herramientas que para R, MINGc y el conjunto de herramientas de /bin (/bin toolset), vale,

All, Win XP Rails 2.0.2 object_transactions plugin (http://code.bitsweat.net/svn/object_transactions/) transaction-simple gem 1.4 (required by object_transactions plugin) AR SQL Server Adapter 1.0 SQL Server 2000 Using the object_transactions plugin with Rails 2.0.2 (and I assume based on what I''m seeing that this goes for Rails 2.x) disables the ability to save to an ActiveRecord based

Hi, I've been using nouveau driveau for 8 months or so, using automated build from drm git, xf86-video-nouveau git and even sometimes mesa drm git and discovered the linux-core build did not build the nouveau driver the hard way: X was refusing to start as the nouveau.ko modules was not loaded nor build. Build process did chnage without obvious way to know womething was wrong. Then I tried

Hello, Last week I submitted a problem with msdfs on samba. I didn't receive any reaction. I've also tried the samba-cvs version but this has also problems. We really like to use msdfs from samba, because we want to put all our homedirectories ( more than 4000 ) in one dfsroot. This is not possible with Microsoft's dfs because this has a limit of 1000 .... I didn't found this

I was just wondering about locales and .yml files. Is it better to store the multilanguage strings in .yml files than in databases? And if yes, why? I was also wondering how rails are loading this files (for example, I have 4 languages in my web app, each has her own .yml file, will my rails app loads all the files in ram and then it will call each variable inside my web app? Or something else?)

I recently came across an enormous cluster of x86 clone machines running fedora core 1 (2.4.24) which have typically all intel or amd have VIA IDE chipsets. They frequently experience corrupted journals rendering the ext3 partition in read-only mode. More important than recovering the filesystem, I am interested in finding the root of the problem. The common hardware that all of these

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Several companies have been interested in getting replication support for Dovecot. It looks like I could begin implementing it in a few months after some other changes. So here's how I'm planning on doing it: What needs to be replicated: - Saving new mails (IMAP, deliver) - Copying existing mails - Expunges - Flag and keyword changes - Mailbox creations, deletions and renames -