search for: tradtional

Hi, I am new to Asterisk and wanted to ask a question concerning PSTN trunking. Is there a way to have DID's sent over IP to a switch? I know if One switch has traditional PSTN like a PRI this can be done, but is there a service provider offering this so I dont have to buy any tradtional PSTN trunking? Thanks, Jim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030901/e2f4d281/attachment.htm

...I was unaware that poly had an interface and could be used like this. The cost model aspect is very important. I'm mildly curious how it builds this. (correct me if I'm wrong please) It's my lay understanding that poly optimizations are an either or and do not generally play well with tradtional methods. More specifically, after poly things are "messed up" and it would be difficult to do another (traditional type) transformation that it missed. Since llvm doesn't have or doesn't do the traditional side very well, this is less a concern though. -------------- next part ---...

After struggling for some time to try and wedge a ZFS file server into our environment, I have come to the conclusion that I''m simply going to have to live without quotas. They have been immensely useful in the past 5 years or so in allowing us to keep track of which groups are hogging disk space, and even finding a bug in one manufacturing/engineering tool which occasionally crashed in a

...-Wno-trigraphs Do not warn about trigraphs -Wcomment{s} Warn if one comment starts inside another -Wno-comment{s} Do not warn about comments -Wtraditional Warn if a macro argument is/would be turned into a string if -tradtional is specified -Wno-traditional Do not warn about stringification -Wundef Warn if an undefined macro is used by #if -Wno-undef Do not warn about testing udefined macros -Wimport Warn about the use of the #import directive -Wno-impor...

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 09/13/2017 02:16 AM, C Bergström wrote: > > A completely non-technical point, but what's the current "polly" license? > Does integrating that code conflict in any way with the work being done to > relicense llvm? > > > Good question. I discussed this explicitly with