search for: toggle_mov

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "toggle_mov".

Did you mean: toggle_move
2011 Nov 28
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...ew bug fixes and many >>> (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. >>> >>> I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile >>> failure when compiling >>> test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the >>> pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the >>> aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query >>> answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is >>> happening. Also...
2011 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...t; (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. >>>>> >>>>> I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile >>>>> failure when compiling >>>>> test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the >>>>> pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the >>>>> aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query >>>>> answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is >&...
2011 Dec 02
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...spired by your comments. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile >>>>>> > failure when compiling >>>>>> > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the >>>>>> > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the >>>>>> > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query >>>>>> > answers. I've never before seen it do thi...
2011 Nov 22
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...tached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile > failure when compiling > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is > happening. Also odd, at the same time, the numer...
2011 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
Tobias, I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile failure when compiling test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is happening. Also odd, at the same time, the numeric labels that are a...
2011 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...It contains a few bug fixes and many > > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. > > > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile > > failure when compiling > > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the > > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the > > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query > > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is > > happening. Also odd, at the...
2011 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On 11/17/2011 12:38 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > Tobias, et al., > > Attached is the my autovectorization pass. Very nice. Will you be at the developer summit? Maybe we could discuss the integration there? Here a first review of the source code. > diff --git a/docs/Passes.html b/docs/Passes.html > index 5c42f3f..076effa 100644 > --- a/docs/Passes.html > +++ b/docs/Passes.html
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...ion) changes inspired by your comments. > >>> > > > >>> > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile > >>> > > failure when compiling > >>> > > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the > >>> > > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the > >>> > > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query > >>> > > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'...
2011 Dec 02
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...g and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments. >>> > > >>> > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile >>> > > failure when compiling >>> > > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the >>> > > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the >>> > > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query >>> > > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why...
2011 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...ion) changes inspired by your comments. > >>> > > > >>> > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile > >>> > > failure when compiling > >>> > > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the > >>> > > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the > >>> > > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query > >>> > > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'...
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...0 0.01 3256 0 0.01 3256 tm.ll 2 14509 0 0.01 14480 0 0.01 14480 toast_alaw.ll 2 18530 0 0.01 18500 0 0.01 18500 toast_audio.ll 4 15882 0 0.01 15852 0 0.01 15852 toast_lin.ll 2 2526 0 0.01 2496 0 0.01 2496 toast.ll 29 108797 0 0.02 108767 0 0.02 108767 toast_ulaw.ll 2 31971 0 0.01 31941 0 0.01 31941 toggle_move.ll 10 43960 0 0.01 43941 0 0.02 44005 token.ll 1 2866 0 0.01 2849 0 0.01 2849 token_stream.ll 10 54298 0 0.01 54273 0 0.01 54273 tol.ll 14 27300 0 0.01 27283 0 0.01 27283 top.ll 137 311177 6 0.03 308747 2 0.03 310415 Towers.ll 12 18539 0 0.01 18520 0 0.01 18520 trace.ll 11 34795 0 0.01 34779 0 0.0...