Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "toggle_move".
2011 Nov 28
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...ew bug fixes and many
>>> (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
>>>
>>> I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
>>> failure when compiling
>>> test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
>>> pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
>>> aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
>>> answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is
>>> happening. Also o...
2011 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...t; (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
>>>>> failure when compiling
>>>>> test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
>>>>> pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
>>>>> aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
>>>>> answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is
>&g...
2011 Dec 02
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...spired by your comments.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
>>>>>> > failure when compiling
>>>>>> > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
>>>>>> > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
>>>>>> > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
>>>>>> > answers. I've never before seen it do this...
2011 Nov 22
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...tached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many
> (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
>
> I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
> failure when compiling
> test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
> pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
> aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
> answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is
> happening. Also odd, at the same time, the numeri...
2011 Nov 21
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
Tobias,
I've attached an updated patch. It contains a few bug fixes and many
(refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
failure when compiling
test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is
happening. Also odd, at the same time, the numeric labels that are
as...
2011 Nov 23
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...It contains a few bug fixes and many
> > (refactoring and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
> >
> > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
> > failure when compiling
> > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
> > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
> > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
> > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why it is
> > happening. Also odd, at the s...
2011 Nov 17
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
On 11/17/2011 12:38 AM, Hal Finkel wrote:
> Tobias, et al.,
>
> Attached is the my autovectorization pass.
Very nice. Will you be at the developer summit? Maybe we could discuss
the integration there?
Here a first review of the source code.
> diff --git a/docs/Passes.html b/docs/Passes.html
> index 5c42f3f..076effa 100644
> --- a/docs/Passes.html
> +++ b/docs/Passes.html
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...ion) changes inspired by your comments.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
> >>> > > failure when compiling
> >>> > > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
> >>> > > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
> >>> > > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
> >>> > > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'...
2011 Dec 02
5
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...g and coding-convention) changes inspired by your comments.
>>> > >
>>> > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
>>> > > failure when compiling
>>> > > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
>>> > > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
>>> > > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
>>> > > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'm not sure why...
2011 Dec 14
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] BasicBlock Autovectorization Pass
...ion) changes inspired by your comments.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I'm currently trying to fix the bug responsible for causing a compile
> >>> > > failure when compiling
> >>> > > test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/obsequi/toggle_move.c; after the
> >>> > > pass begins to fuse instructions in a basic block in this file, the
> >>> > > aliasing analysis starts producing different (more pessimistic) query
> >>> > > answers. I've never before seen it do this, and I'...
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...0 0.01 3256 0 0.01 3256
tm.ll 2 14509 0 0.01 14480 0 0.01 14480
toast_alaw.ll 2 18530 0 0.01 18500 0 0.01 18500
toast_audio.ll 4 15882 0 0.01 15852 0 0.01 15852
toast_lin.ll 2 2526 0 0.01 2496 0 0.01 2496
toast.ll 29 108797 0 0.02 108767 0 0.02 108767
toast_ulaw.ll 2 31971 0 0.01 31941 0 0.01 31941
toggle_move.ll 10 43960 0 0.01 43941 0 0.02 44005
token.ll 1 2866 0 0.01 2849 0 0.01 2849
token_stream.ll 10 54298 0 0.01 54273 0 0.01 54273
tol.ll 14 27300 0 0.01 27283 0 0.01 27283
top.ll 137 311177 6 0.03 308747 2 0.03 310415
Towers.ll 12 18539 0 0.01 18520 0 0.01 18520
trace.ll 11 34795 0 0.01 34779 0 0.01...