search for: tnolen

I have a new Debian testing machine running the Debian Samba 3.0.5. Everything seems OK except that I cannot get users to have domain admin rights. I have Windows XP workstations. The workstations join and log onto the domain fine. A "net groupmap list" yields: server:/home/tnolen# net groupmap list System Operators (S-1-5-32-549) -> -1 Replicators (S-1-5-32-552) -> -1 Guests (S-1-5-32-546) -> -1 Domain Users (S-1-5-21-3876029557-4061927837-2224609541-513) -> users Power Users (S-1-5-32-547) -> -1 Print Operators (S-1-5-32-550) -> -1 Administrators (S-1-5-3...

Has anyone had success with Appcac Plus (Dos) running on a samba machine? If so, any particular lanpak and version requirements? How about locking - I'll assume oplocks off (like NT). Thanks, Steve -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed

...at the moment and my server is using U-160 SCSI interface so it should not cause these strange problems. Thanks for your help. Vincent ----- Original Message ----- From: "vincent blondel" <vincent.blondel@chello.be> To: <samba@lists.samba.org> Cc: "Trey Nolen" <tnolen@internetpro.net>; "Martyn Ranyard" <ranyardm@lineone.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:21 PM Subject: Re: performance problem ??? > http://www.tldp.org/LDP/solrhe/Securing-Optimizing-Linux-RH-Edition-v1.3.pdf > > Thanks > > ----- Original Message ----- > F...

...in=[SURSON] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.3a] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME [root@firewall init.d]# Franco Catena http://www.surson.com.br tel 011-44374040 cel:78535362 NEXTEL: 55*26006*1 MSN: facdavilla@hotmail.com ICQ: 24755602 -----Mensagem original----- De: Trey Nolen [mailto:tnolen@internetpro.net] Enviada em: domingo, 16 de mar?o de 2003 13:54 Para: FRANCO Assunto: Re: [Samba] I feel abandoned Winbind is fairly new. The majority of people are not using it yet. Google doesn't show results because people are not yet having the problems, and are not asking about them....

Hi, I got a similar problem with my test configuration. I am using share drives from my AMD Athlon XP 1600+ / 512 DDR RAM running with NT4 workstation and my linux server is a Slackware 8.0 with kernel 2.4.18 and Samba 2.2.4 running on a Pentium 166 MMX / 128 RAM / U160 40Gb SCSI disk. My problem is a bit different. I get well a lot of performance but my connections often break. So I can well

OK, I had emailed yesterday about an issue backing up a W2K machine using rsync under Cygwin. I was having trouble backing up the root directory, and I'm happy to say that the suggestion of using /cygdrive/c seems to have worked! Unfortunately, now I'm getting another error. The error is this: Invalid file index <some number> (count=<some number>) rsync error: protocol

I'm using rsync and cygwin to do some backups from Windows machines. I have been doing something along these lines: c:\cygwin\bin\rsync -aR -e c:\cygwin\bin\ssh.exe --numeric-ids --delete --delete-after --verbose --ignore-errors --exclude-from=/cygdrive/c/offsitebackup/excludes.txt /cygdrive/c/ root@remotehost This all worked well until I had to do backups of several mapped drives

I have a Debian server running samba 2.2.3. We are running Peachtree 2002 (version 9) and we have issues with the data being on the server. First, during the install, Peachtree says that our server doesn't handle long file names. Obviously it does, but we have to install it by acting like the data is on the local machine and then changing the .ini file to point the data directory to the

We have many Samba servers in production. A few of them are having problems with file corruption. I've seen mention of issues with kernel 2.4.18. I know that 2.5.x has some necessary patches. My question is, what kernel is now recommended? Is 2.5 stable enough for production? Or is there an earlier 2.4.x without the issues of 2.4.18 that is more recommended? Trey Nolen

I've got an issue with remote files being deleted after the local file has been deleted. For some reason, this isn't happening. I'm running rsync 2.5.6 protocol 26 (yes, I know there are newer versions, but logistics dictates that I can't upgrade right now). I have used the --delete, --delete-after, and --ignore-errors options in all sorts of combinations. An example of the

I'm running Samba with automount to automatically mount CDs in a server. These CDs need to be changed periodically, so I wanted to use automount so that they could be changed by the users fairly easily. We use logon scripts to map the CDs to drive letters when users logon. Unfortunately, it seems that having a drive mapped is treated like the drive is being used, so as long as there is

Hi, I'm having some trouble using rsync on W2K under Cygwin. We are using it to back up the W2K machine to a Linux machine. We are using the patched version of rsync 2.5.6 that allows it to run faster on NT/2K when calculating the changes. We can backup a directory without a problem, but in this case, we want to backup everything, so the directory we are backing up is \. We do not run rsync

I've got a 2.2.3a-12 (Debian Stable) Samba server running on a small network with 98, 2000, and XP machines. The server is a domain controller and the computers are members of the domain. We are using login scripts to map the drives. I have one computer that is having a weird issue. When the user first logs on, you can go to My Computer and see the drive fine. Double-clicking on the drive

Hi, I recently installed a new samba server to replace an older Novell machine. Now, we are having performance issues. I have installed many samba servers, and have not run into this problem before. Some background info: The server is an Athlon 1800+ w/ 512MB DDR RAM. We are using software raid on 80GB IDE ATA 100 drives with the VIA 82C3XX chipset. When mirroring the drives, we usually get