search for: tjnet

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "tjnet".

Did you mean: tenet
2006 May 21
1
Re: Speex-dev Digest, Vol 24, Issue 21
Sir, Sorry, I can not return your email immediately. I am out of office from May 18 to June 6, 2006. thanks for your patience, Jay Huang
2004 Oct 06
4
Cpu bandwidth for Speex on Win32 platforms
Hi, I try to use Speex codec into Win32 platforms. However, I find the CPU bandwidth usage is very heavy on a Pentium 3 machine. Compare to Microsoft's G723.1 codec, speex 8k is using more than 20% cpu bandwidth. Does anyone know what is the best version of Speex to "beat" the Microsoft's G723.1's on CPU bandwidth usage? Does Speex have MMX-enabled codes? thanks very
2003 Oct 14
5
Digium cards just for timing
Hi, I've found that neither Michael Manousos patch nor ztdummy driver do not fix musiconhold sound interruption problem up to acceptable quality level. Sound is choppy here anyway. It is my understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong) that if I have a Digium card in my asterisk machine, these problems should be gone 'cause those cards provide some reliable timing. So I have no
2005 Mar 20
3
Soekris net4801 and analog interface?
Is anyone using a net4801 and an analog only setup? I am looking for a modem that is PCI 3.3V, apparently the X100P is 5.0V PCI only so it won't work with the net4801.
2004 Oct 13
1
SSE support ?
Dear Sir: I have downloaded the latest Window's installer version ( 1.1.6) ? Does this "dll" support SSE enhancement? Regards, Jay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041013/1d38f1c4/attachment.html
2004 Dec 13
1
Encoding performance on ARM7/9 ?
Hi, I have read the decoding side performance on ARM7 or ARM9. Your comment is very useful for us on evaluating the possible usage of Speex on our ARM system. How about the encoding performance? In your article, you mentioned "optimization". What is it? Is it included the 1.1.6 release source codes? thanks, Jay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was