search for: tizzi

Ok for those of you all up in a tizzy over my subject line, please don't take it literally because I'm certainly not saying that asterisk is the problem here. I just got a little nightmare problem that I need a bit of help figuring out. I installed an asterisk system a few months ago for a client, it has run almost flawlessly with the exception of a few small glitches. However, I got a

[previously sent to rhelv5 list, apologies to those on both] I've got a problem I can reproduce easily enough, but really I fail to understand what's going wrong. I've got a 5.3 Dom0, which is running three guests. One is Fedora 10, that runs with local flat files, and works fine. One is Nexenta 2 (opensolaris-based), and that runs off of physical partitions, and seems to work

I think I understand what Active Directory is all about. I understand LDAP and I understand Kerberos. I can see how AD (well, Kerberos actually) enables single-sign-on (I assume it deals in tickets with the Windows clients as standard Kerberos clients do) and can make life easy in a large network (which, IIRC was one of the design goals of Kerberos in the first place). But lets say I have a

I''ve got a form with inputs like user[first_name], user[last_name], etc. When editing the user instead of creating a new one I include a user[id]. I then try and save the object using: user = User.new(params[:user]) user.save() I would *expect* that since I included the user[id] it should do an update and should call validate_on_update. But this doesn''t appear to be the

All, As much as I hate to ask, how is this project coming along? We are approaching the 4 month post-release point... -David -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110404/1e9862bd/attachment-0005.html>

Here is a proposal for a new ''copies'' property which would allow different levels of replication for different filesystems. Your comments are appreciated! --matt A. INTRODUCTION ZFS stores multiple copies of all metadata. This is accomplished by storing up to three DVAs (Disk Virtual Addresses) in each block pointer. This feature is known as "Ditto Blocks". When

Here is a proposal for a new ''copies'' property which would allow different levels of replication for different filesystems. Your comments are appreciated! --matt A. INTRODUCTION ZFS stores multiple copies of all metadata. This is accomplished by storing up to three DVAs (Disk Virtual Addresses) in each block pointer. This feature is known as "Ditto Blocks". When